Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Maturitas. 2018 Sep;115:56-63. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
The aim of this study was to investigate socioeconomic inequalities in frailty among older adults in six low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and to examine to what extent chronic diseases account for these inequalities.
Data were used from the Study on global AGEing and adult health (SAGE) wave 1 (2007-2010). Nationally representative samples of adults aged 50+ years from China, Ghana, India, Mexico, the Russian Federation and South Africa were analyzed (n = 31,174).
Educational level and wealth were used as socioeconomic indicators. Frailty was assessed with modified criteria for the frailty phenotype. Self-reported disease diagnoses were used. A relative index of inequality (RII) was calculated to compare socioeconomic inequalities in frailty between countries.
People in lower socioeconomic positions had higher prevalence rates of frailty. The largest inequalities in frailty were found in Mexico (RII 3.7, 95% CI 2.1-6.4), and the smallest inequalities in Ghana (RII 1.1, 95% CI 0.7-1.8). Mediation analyses revealed that the chronic diseases considered in this study do not explain the higher prevalence of frailty seen in lower socioeconomic groups.
Substantial socioeconomic inequalities in frailty were observed in LMICs, but additional research is needed to find explanations for these. Given that the population of older adults in many LMICs is expanding at a greater rate than in many high-income countries, our results indicate an urgent public health need to address frailty in these countries.
本研究旨在探讨六个中低收入国家(LMICs)老年人衰弱的社会经济不平等现象,并考察慢性疾病在多大程度上导致了这些不平等。
本研究使用了全球老龄化和成人健康研究(SAGE)第 1 波(2007-2010 年)的数据。分析了来自中国、加纳、印度、墨西哥、俄罗斯联邦和南非的 50 岁及以上成年人的全国代表性样本(n=31174)。
教育水平和财富被用作社会经济指标。衰弱程度采用衰弱表型的修正标准进行评估。使用自我报告的疾病诊断。计算相对不平等指数(RII)来比较各国之间衰弱的社会经济不平等程度。
社会经济地位较低的人群衰弱的患病率较高。在墨西哥发现了最大的衰弱不平等(RII 3.7,95%CI 2.1-6.4),而在加纳发现了最小的衰弱不平等(RII 1.1,95%CI 0.7-1.8)。中介分析表明,本研究中考虑的慢性疾病并不能解释社会经济地位较低的人群中衰弱的患病率较高的现象。
在中低收入国家观察到了衰弱的显著社会经济不平等现象,但需要进一步研究以找到这些不平等现象的解释。鉴于许多中低收入国家的老年人口增长速度高于许多高收入国家,我们的研究结果表明,这些国家迫切需要解决衰弱问题,以满足公共卫生需求。