Konski Andre
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Pennsylvania, USA.
Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania, USA.
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Jun;7(3):371-377. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.12.38.
The use of radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer has evolved from treatments utilizing large fields with hand placed blocks to radiotherapy treatments given with a linear accelerator moving around the patient on a robotic arm. These technologic developments have allowed radiation dose escalations resulting in improvements in disease and patient reported outcomes with longer biochemical disease-free survival (DFS) as well as improved quality of life. Increased costs have accompanied these technologic improvements with some private payers questioning the increased cost of the newer treatments and in some instances refusing to pay for some treatment modalities such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) or proton beam therapy (PBT). Cost-effectiveness analysis have been used in an attempt to illustrate these new treatments were cost-effective when compared to the older treatments. Cost-effectiveness analyses will need to be adapted in the current health care environment to provide an assessment of value as many payers, including medicare, move to a value-based reimbursement system.
前列腺癌放射治疗的应用已从使用手工放置挡块的大野照射治疗发展到利用直线加速器在机器人手臂上围绕患者移动进行放射治疗。这些技术发展使得放射剂量得以提高,从而改善了疾病状况和患者报告的结果,延长了生化无病生存期(DFS),并提高了生活质量。伴随着这些技术进步,成本也有所增加,一些私人支付方质疑新治疗方法成本的增加,在某些情况下拒绝为某些治疗方式付费,如调强放射治疗(IMRT)或质子束治疗(PBT)。成本效益分析已被用于试图说明与旧治疗方法相比,这些新治疗方法具有成本效益。在当前的医疗环境中,随着包括医疗保险在内的许多支付方转向基于价值的报销系统,成本效益分析需要进行调整,以提供价值评估。