Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Eur Radiol. 2019 Feb;29(2):517-526. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5567-z. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
To evaluate the epidemiology of systematic reviews (SRs) published in imaging journals.
A MEDLINE search identified SRs published in imaging journals from 1 January 2000-31 December 2016. Articles retrieved were screened against inclusion criteria. Demographic and methodological characteristics were extracted from studies. Temporal trends were evaluated using linear regression and Pearson's correlation coefficients.
921 SRs were included that reported on 27,435 primary studies, 85,276,484 patients and were cited 26,961 times. The SR publication rate increased 23-fold (r=0.92, p<0.001) while the proportion of SRs to non-SRs increased 13-fold (r = 0.94, p<0.001) from 2000 (0.10%) to 2016 (1.33%). Diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) SRs were most frequent (46.5%) followed by therapeutic SRs (16.6%). Most SRs did not report funding status (54.2%). The median author team size was five; this increased over time (r=0.20, p<0.001). Of the studies, 67.3% included an imaging specialist co-author; this decreased over time (r=-0.57, p=0.017). Most SRs included a meta-analysis (69.6%). Journal impact factor positively correlated with SR publication rates (r=0.54, p<0.001). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 'vascular and interventional radiology' were the most frequently studied imaging modality and subspecialty, respectively. The USA, UK, China, Netherlands and Canada were the top five publishing countries.
The SR publication rate is increasing rapidly compared with the rate of growth of non-SRs; however, they still make up just over 1% of all studies. Authors, reviewers and editors should be aware of methodological and reporting standards specific to imaging systematic reviews including those for DTA and individual patient data.
• Systematic review publication rate has increased 23-fold from 2000-2016. • The proportion of systematic reviews to non-systematic reviews has increased 13-fold. • The USA, UK and China are the most frequent published countries; those from the USA and China are increasing the most rapidly.
评估影像学杂志发表的系统评价(SRs)的流行病学。
通过 MEDLINE 检索,确定了 2000 年 1 月 1 日至 2016 年 12 月 31 日期间发表在影像学杂志上的 SRs。对检索到的文章进行筛选,以符合纳入标准。从研究中提取人口统计学和方法学特征。使用线性回归和 Pearson 相关系数评估时间趋势。
共纳入 921 篇 SRs,报道了 27435 项原始研究、85276484 例患者,被引用 26961 次。SR 发表率增加了 23 倍(r=0.92,p<0.001),而 SR 与非 SR 之比增加了 13 倍(r=0.94,p<0.001),从 2000 年(0.10%)到 2016 年(1.33%)。诊断性测试准确性(DTA)SRs 最为常见(46.5%),其次是治疗性 SRs(16.6%)。大多数 SRs 未报告资金状况(54.2%)。作者团队的中位数规模为 5 人;这随着时间的推移而增加(r=0.20,p<0.001)。在这些研究中,67.3%的研究包括影像专家合著者;这随着时间的推移而减少(r=-0.57,p=0.017)。大多数 SRs 都包括了荟萃分析(69.6%)。期刊影响因子与 SR 发表率呈正相关(r=0.54,p<0.001)。磁共振成像(MRI)和“血管和介入放射学”分别是最常研究的影像学方式和亚专业。美国、英国、中国、荷兰和加拿大是发表论文最多的五个国家。
与非 SR 的增长率相比,SR 的发表率增长迅速;然而,它们仍然只占所有研究的 1%以上。作者、审稿人和编辑应该意识到特定于影像学系统评价的方法学和报告标准,包括 DTA 和个体患者数据。
系统评价的发表率从 2000 年到 2016 年增加了 23 倍。
系统评价与非系统评价的比例增加了 13 倍。
美国、英国和中国是最常发表论文的国家;来自美国和中国的论文增长最快。