Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA.
Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, 2400 Pratt Street, Suite 7009, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2018 Nov;46(4):435-439. doi: 10.1007/s11239-018-1715-1.
Anticoagulation is highly effective for the prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) but it is dependent on patients continuing therapy. While studies have demonstrated suboptimal therapeutic persistence on warfarin, few have studied persistence rates with non vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) such as dabigatran. We examined rates of continued use of dabigatran versus warfarin over 1 year among AF patients in the ORBIT-AF registry between June 29, 2010 and August 09, 2011. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify characteristics associated with 1-year persistent use of dabigatran therapy or warfarin. At baseline, 6.4 and 93.6% of 7150 AF patients were on dabigatran and warfarin, respectively. At 12 months, dabigatran-treated patients were less likely to have continued their therapy than warfarin-treated patients [Adjusted persistence rates: 66% (95% CI 60-72) vs. 82% (95% CI 80-84), p < .0001]. Predictors of dabigatran persistence included: CHADS-VASc risk scores ≥ 2 OR 5.69, (95% CI 1.50-21.6) and BMI greater than 25 mg/m but less than 38 kg/m 1.05 (1.01-1.09). Predictors of persistence on warfarin included: African American race (vs. White) 1.53 (1.07-2.19), Hispanic ethnicity (vs. White) 1.66 (1.06-2.60), paroxysmal and persistent AF (vs. new-onset) 1.68 (1.21-2.33) and 1.91 (1.35-2.69) respectively, LVH 1.40 (1.08-1.81), and CHADS-VASc risk scores ≥ 2 1.94 (1.18-3.19). While 1-year persistence rates for dabigatran were lower than warfarin, persistence rates for both agents were not ideal. Future studies evaluating contemporary persistence are needed in order to assist in better targeting interventions aimed to improve anticoagulation persistence.
抗凝治疗对于预防心房颤动(AF)患者的中风非常有效,但它依赖于患者继续治疗。尽管研究表明华法林的治疗持续性不理想,但很少有研究研究达比加群等非维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂(NOAC)的持续性。我们在 2010 年 6 月 29 日至 2011 年 8 月 9 日之间的 ORBIT-AF 登记处研究了 AF 患者在 1 年内继续使用达比加群与华法林的情况。多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定与达比加群治疗或华法林持续使用 1 年相关的特征。在基线时,7150 名 AF 患者中有 6.4%和 93.6%分别接受达比加群和华法林治疗。在 12 个月时,接受达比加群治疗的患者继续治疗的可能性低于接受华法林治疗的患者[调整后的持续治疗率:66%(95%CI 60-72)与 82%(95%CI 80-84),p<0.0001]。达比加群持续治疗的预测因素包括:CHA2DS2-VASc 风险评分≥2 或 5.69(95%CI 1.50-21.6)和 BMI 大于 25mg/m2 但小于 38kg/m2 1.05(1.01-1.09)。华法林持续治疗的预测因素包括:非裔美国人(与白人相比)1.53(1.07-2.19),西班牙裔(与白人相比)1.66(1.06-2.60),阵发性和持续性 AF(与新发相比)1.68(1.21-2.33)和 1.91(1.35-2.69),左心室肥厚 1.40(1.08-1.81)和 CHA2DS2-VASc 风险评分≥2 1.94(1.18-3.19)。虽然达比加群的 1 年持续治疗率低于华法林,但两种药物的持续治疗率都不理想。需要进行评估当代持续性的未来研究,以帮助更好地确定旨在提高抗凝持续性的干预措施的目标。