• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Adherence to dabigatran therapy and longitudinal patient outcomes: insights from the veterans health administration.达比加群治疗的依从性与纵向患者结局:来自退伍军人健康管理局的观察。
Am Heart J. 2014 Jun;167(6):810-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 Apr 5.
2
Adherence and outcomes to direct oral anticoagulants among patients with atrial fibrillation: findings from the veterans health administration.心房颤动患者使用直接口服抗凝剂的依从性及治疗结果:退伍军人健康管理局的研究发现
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017 Sep 2;17(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12872-017-0671-6.
3
Site-level variation in and practices associated with dabigatran adherence.达比加群的药物依从性及其相关的场所水平变化和实践。
JAMA. 2015 Apr 14;313(14):1443-50. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.2761.
4
Adherence to anticoagulant treatment with dabigatran in a real-world setting.达比加群在真实世界环境中的抗凝治疗依从性。
J Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jul;11(7):1295-9. doi: 10.1111/jth.12241.
5
Higher persistence in newly diagnosed nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients treated with dabigatran versus warfarin.与华法林相比,达比加群治疗新诊断的非瓣膜性心房颤动患者的持续性更高。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):567-74. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000192. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
6
Dabigatran adherence in atrial fibrillation patients during the first year after diagnosis: a nationwide cohort study.诊断后第一年的心房颤动患者达比加群的依从性:一项全国性队列研究。
J Thromb Haemost. 2015 Apr;13(4):495-504. doi: 10.1111/jth.12845. Epub 2015 Feb 12.
7
Non-warfarin oral anticoagulant copayments and adherence in atrial fibrillation: A population-based cohort study.非华法林口服抗凝剂共付额与房颤患者的依从性:一项基于人群的队列研究。
Am Heart J. 2021 Mar;233:109-121. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2020.12.010. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
8
Risks for stroke, bleeding, and death in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving dabigatran or warfarin in relation to the CHADS2 score: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial.在接受达比加群或华法林治疗的房颤患者中,与 CHADS2 评分相关的卒中和出血风险及死亡率:RE-LY 试验的亚组分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Nov 15;155(10):660-7, W204. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-10-201111150-00004.
9
Dabigatran for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: focus in the geriatric population.达比加群酯用于非瓣膜性心房颤动的卒中预防:聚焦老年人群
Consult Pharm. 2014 Mar;29(3):169-78. doi: 10.4140/TCP.n.2014.169.
10
Real-World Health Care Costs Based on Medication Adherence and Risk of Stroke and Bleeding in Patients Treated with Novel Anticoagulant Therapy.基于新型抗凝治疗患者药物依从性和卒中及出血风险的真实世界医疗成本。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2018 May;24(5):430-439. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2018.24.5.430.

引用本文的文献

1
Adherence and persistence with direct oral anticoagulants by dose regimen: A systematic review.直接口服抗凝剂按剂量方案的依从性和持续性:一项系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Apr;91(4):1096-1113. doi: 10.1002/bcp.70003. Epub 2025 Feb 16.
2
Application of Alfalfa App in the management of oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.苜蓿在心房颤动患者口服抗凝管理中的应用:一项多中心随机对照试验。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Oct 9;24(1):294. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02701-1.
3
Association of direct oral anticoagulants and warfarin with incidence of dementia in atrial fibrillation patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.直接口服抗凝剂和华法林与心房颤动患者痴呆发病率的关联:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Sep 4;54:101401. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101401. eCollection 2024 Oct.
4
Association Between Oral Anticoagulant Adherence and Serious Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Long-Term Retrospective Cohort Study.口服抗凝药物治疗依从性与房颤患者严重临床结局的相关性:一项长期回顾性队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 17;13(18):e035639. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035639. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
5
Pharmacy-Led Management of Atrial Fibrillation: Improving Treatment Adherence and Patient Outcomes.由药房主导的心房颤动管理:提高治疗依从性及改善患者预后
Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2024 Jul 29;13:101-114. doi: 10.2147/IPRP.S397844. eCollection 2024.
6
Assessing adherence to treatment guidelines and complications among atrial fibrillation patients in the United Arab Emirates.评估阿拉伯联合酋长国房颤患者对治疗指南的依从性及并发症情况。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 10;11:1359922. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1359922. eCollection 2024.
7
Effectiveness of Anticoagulants in Reducing Stroke Risk Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation.抗凝剂在降低心房颤动患者中风风险方面的有效性。
Cureus. 2024 Apr 29;16(4):e59298. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59298. eCollection 2024 Apr.
8
Selection of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulant for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation Based on Patient Profile: Perspectives from Vietnamese Experts. Part 2.基于患者情况选择非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝剂用于心房颤动的卒中预防:越南专家观点。第2部分。
Eur Cardiol. 2023 Dec 15;18:e62. doi: 10.15420/ecr.2023.25. eCollection 2023.
9
Adherence to direct or vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: a long-term observational study.房颤患者对直接或维生素 K 拮抗剂口服抗凝剂的依从性:一项长期观察性研究。
J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2024 Mar;57(3):437-444. doi: 10.1007/s11239-023-02921-8. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
10
Minimal Adherence Threshold to Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation to Reduce the Risk of Thromboembolism and Death: A Nationwide Cohort Study.心房颤动患者非维生素K拮抗剂口服抗凝药的最低依从阈值以降低血栓栓塞和死亡风险:一项全国性队列研究
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2025 Feb;39(1):107-117. doi: 10.1007/s10557-023-07507-3. Epub 2023 Sep 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Adherence and outcomes of patients treated with dabigatran: pharmacist-managed anticoagulation clinic versus usual care.接受达比加群治疗的患者的依从性和结局:药剂师管理抗凝门诊与常规护理。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 Jul 1;70(13):1154-61. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120634.
2
Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate and warfarin in "real-world" patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective nationwide cohort study.达比加群酯和华法林在“真实世界”心房颤动患者中的疗效和安全性:一项前瞻性全国性队列研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jun 4;61(22):2264-73. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.03.020. Epub 2013 Apr 3.
3
Dabigatran and postmarketing reports of bleeding.达比加群与上市后出血报告。
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1272-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1302834. Epub 2013 Mar 13.
4
Differences and trends in stroke prevention anticoagulation in primary care vs cardiology specialty management of new atrial fibrillation: The Retrospective Evaluation and Assessment of Therapies in AF (TREAT-AF) study.在初级保健与心血管专业管理新发心房颤动的抗凝预防方面的差异和趋势:回顾性评估和房颤治疗评估(TREAT-AF)研究。
Am Heart J. 2013 Jan;165(1):93-101.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.010. Epub 2012 Nov 20.
5
Gaps in monitoring during oral anticoagulation: insights into care transitions, monitoring barriers, and medication nonadherence.口服抗凝治疗期间的监测空白:了解治疗过渡期、监测障碍和药物依从性。
Chest. 2013 Mar;143(3):751-757. doi: 10.1378/chest.12-1119.
6
Will newer anticoagulants improve therapy persistence?新型抗凝药会提高治疗依从性吗?
Arch Intern Med. 2012 Nov 26;172(21):1689-90. doi: 10.1001/2013.jamainternmed.616.
7
Dabigatran etexilate in clinical practice: confronting challenges to improve safety and effectiveness.达比加群酯在临床实践中的应用:应对挑战以提高安全性和有效性。
Pharmacotherapy. 2011 Dec;31(12):1232-49. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.12.1232.
8
A new risk scheme to predict warfarin-associated hemorrhage: The ATRIA (Anticoagulation and Risk Factors in Atrial Fibrillation) Study.一种新的预测华法林相关出血风险的方案:ATRIA(心房颤动抗凝和危险因素)研究。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Jul 19;58(4):395-401. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.03.031.
9
Variations in efficiency and the relationship to quality of care in the veterans health system.退伍军人健康系统中的效率差异及其与医疗质量的关系。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Apr;30(4):655-63. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0435.
10
Prognosis and guideline-adherent antithrombotic treatment in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: implications of undertreatment and overtreatment in real-life clinical practice; the Loire Valley Atrial Fibrillation Project.心房颤动和心房扑动患者的预后和指南一致的抗血栓治疗:真实临床实践中治疗不足和过度治疗的影响;卢瓦尔河谷心房颤动项目。
Chest. 2011 Oct;140(4):911-917. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-2436. Epub 2011 Mar 24.

达比加群治疗的依从性与纵向患者结局:来自退伍军人健康管理局的观察。

Adherence to dabigatran therapy and longitudinal patient outcomes: insights from the veterans health administration.

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO; University of Colorado-School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium, Denver, CO.

Veterans Affairs Eastern Colorado Health Care System, Denver, CO; Colorado Cardiovascular Outcomes Research Consortium, Denver, CO; University of Colorado-School of Public Health, Aurora, CO.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2014 Jun;167(6):810-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.023. Epub 2014 Apr 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2014.03.023
PMID:24890529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5381802/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Dabigatran is a novel oral anti-coagulant (NOAC) that reduces risk of stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). It does not require routine monitoring with laboratory testing which may have an adverse impact on adherence. We aimed to describe adherence to dabigatran in the first year after initiation and assess the association between non-adherence to dabigatran and clinical outcomes in a large integrated healthcare system.

METHODS

We studied a national cohort of 5,376 patients with NVAF, initiated on dabigatran between October-2010 and September-2012 at all Veterans Affairs hospitals. Adherence to dabigatran was calculated as proportion of days covered (PDC) and association between PDC and outcomes was assessed using standard regression techniques.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study cohort was 71.3 ± 9.7 years; 98.3% were men and mean CHADS2 score was 2.4 ± 1.2 (mean CHA2DS2VASc score 3.2 ± 1.4). Median PDC was 94% (IQR 76%-100%; mean PDC 84% ± 22%) over a median follow-up of 244 days (IQR 140-351). A total of 1,494 (27.8%) patients had a PDC <80% and were classified as non-adherent. After multivariable adjustment, lower adherence was associated with increased risk for combined all-cause mortality and stroke (HR 1.13, 95% CI 1.07-1.19 per 10% decrease in PDC). Adherence to dabigatran was not associated with non-fatal bleeding or myocardial infarction.

CONCLUSIONS

In the year after initiation, adherence to dabigatran for a majority of patients is very good. However, 28% of patients in our cohort had poor adherence. Furthermore, lower adherence to dabigatran was associated with increased adverse outcomes. Concerted efforts are needed to optimize adherence to NOACs.

摘要

背景

达比加群酯是一种新型口服抗凝药物(NOAC),可降低非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者发生中风的风险。它不需要常规进行实验室检测,这可能会对患者的依从性产生不利影响。我们旨在描述达比加群酯在起始治疗后的第一年的依从性,并评估在一个大型综合医疗保健系统中,达比加群酯不依从与临床结局之间的关系。

方法

我们研究了一个全国性的 NVAF 患者队列,该队列共纳入了 5376 名于 2010 年 10 月至 2012 年 9 月期间在所有退伍军人事务部医院起始使用达比加群酯的患者。使用比例天数覆盖(PDC)来评估患者对达比加群酯的依从性,并使用标准回归技术评估 PDC 与结局之间的关系。

结果

研究队列的平均年龄为 71.3 ± 9.7 岁;98.3%为男性,平均 CHADS2 评分为 2.4 ± 1.2(平均 CHA2DS2VASc 评分为 3.2 ± 1.4)。中位 PDC 为 94%(IQR 76%-100%;平均 PDC 84% ± 22%),中位随访时间为 244 天(IQR 140-351)。共有 1494 名(27.8%)患者的 PDC<80%,被归类为不依从。经多变量调整后,PDC 每降低 10%,全因死亡率和中风的风险增加(风险比 1.13,95%置信区间 1.07-1.19)。达比加群酯的依从性与非致死性出血或心肌梗死无关。

结论

在起始治疗后的一年内,大多数患者对达比加群酯的依从性非常好。然而,我们队列中的 28%的患者依从性较差。此外,达比加群酯的依从性较低与不良结局的增加相关。需要共同努力,优化新型口服抗凝药物的依从性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8554/5381802/ba6359bb76ea/nihms-668908-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8554/5381802/4efa26c64e86/nihms-668908-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8554/5381802/493b33e2d666/nihms-668908-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8554/5381802/ba6359bb76ea/nihms-668908-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8554/5381802/4efa26c64e86/nihms-668908-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8554/5381802/493b33e2d666/nihms-668908-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8554/5381802/ba6359bb76ea/nihms-668908-f0003.jpg