Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States.
Respir Med. 2018 Aug;141:172-179. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.07.005. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
The Institute of Medicine emphasizes care timeliness as an important quality metric. We assessed treatment timeliness in stage I-IIIA lung cancer patients deemed eligible for curative intent therapy and analyzed the relationship between time to treatment (TTT) and timely treatment (TT) with survival.
We retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases of stage I-IIIA lung cancer deemed eligible for curative intent therapy at the VA San Diego Healthcare System between 10/2010-4/2017. We defined TTT as days from chest tumor board to treatment initiation and TT using guideline recommendations. We used multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards regressions for survival analyses.
In 177 veterans, the median TTT was 35 days (29 days for chemoradiation, 36 for surgical resection, 42 for definitive radiation). TT occurred in 33% or 77% of patients when the most or least timely guideline recommendation was used, respectively. Patient characteristics associated with longer TTT included other cancer history, high simplified comorbidity score, stage I disease, and definitive radiation treatment. In MVA, TTT and TT [HR 0.53 (95% CI 0.27, 1.01) for least timely definition] were not associated with OS in stage I-IIIA patients, or disease-free survival in subgroup analyses of 122 stage I patients [HR 1.49 (0.62, 3.59) for least timely definition].
Treatment was timely in 33-77% of veterans with lung cancer deemed eligible for curative intent therapy. TTT and TT were not associated with survival. The time interval between diagnosis and treatment may offer an opportunity to deliver or improve other cancer care.
美国医学研究所强调及时性是重要的质量指标。我们评估了符合根治性治疗条件的 I 期-IIIA 期肺癌患者的治疗及时性,并分析了治疗时间(TTT)与及时治疗(TT)与生存之间的关系。
我们回顾性分析了 2010 年 10 月至 2017 年 4 月期间在 VA 圣地亚哥医疗保健系统被认为有资格接受根治性治疗的连续 I 期-IIIA 期肺癌病例。我们将 TTT 定义为从胸部肿瘤委员会到治疗开始的天数,将 TT 定义为使用指南建议的时间。我们使用多变量(MVA)Cox 比例风险回归进行生存分析。
在 177 名退伍军人中,中位 TTT 为 35 天(放化疗为 29 天,手术切除为 36 天,根治性放疗为 42 天)。当使用最及时或最不及时的指南建议时,分别有 33%或 77%的患者接受 TT。与 TTT 较长相关的患者特征包括其他癌症病史、简化合并症评分高、I 期疾病和根治性放疗。在 MVA 中,TTT 和 TT [最不及时定义的 HR 0.53(95%CI 0.27,1.01)]与 I 期-IIIA 期患者的总生存期或 122 例 I 期患者亚组分析中的无病生存期无关[最不及时定义的 HR 1.49(0.62,3.59)]。
在被认为有资格接受根治性治疗的肺癌退伍军人中,有 33-77%的患者得到了及时治疗。TTT 和 TT 与生存无关。诊断和治疗之间的时间间隔可能为提供或改善其他癌症治疗提供机会。