Department of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Alkermes, Inc., Waltham, Massachusetts.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2018 Oct;42(10):2011-2021. doi: 10.1111/acer.13849. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
Demonstrating clinically meaningful benefits of alcohol use disorder treatments is challenging.
We report findings from a 12-week, phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of samidorphan (1, 2.5, or 10 mg/d) in adults with alcohol use disorder (NCT00981617). The primary end point was percentage of subjects with no heavy drinking days (PSNHDD) during weeks 5 to 12; secondary end points included alcohol consumption measures, craving, and patient-rated outcomes.
Altogether, 406 patients were included in the full analysis set (101, 104, 100, and 101 in the placebo, samidorphan 1, 2.5, and 10 mg treatment groups, respectively). There was no statistical difference between samidorphan and placebo groups on PSNHDD during weeks 5 to 12. However, dose-dependent reductions in cumulative rate of heavy drinking days were observed (-41%, p < 0.001 for samidorphan 10 mg/d vs. placebo; -30 and -32% for samidorphan 2.5 and 1 mg, p < 0.05 for both). A higher percentage of samidorphan- than placebo-treated patients had a ≥2-category downshift in World Health Organization (WHO) risk levels of drinking. There were significant reductions from baseline with samidorphan versus placebo in alcohol craving (for samidorphan 10 mg: -38.2 [standard error: 2.9] vs. placebo: -30.2 [2.8]; p = 0.044). On a Patient Global Assessment of Response to Therapy (PGART), samidorphan 10 mg was superior to placebo at 4, 8, and 12 weeks (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.01, respectively). Improvement in PGART correlated with a reduction in craving and a decrease in WHO risk level.
Results for the primary outcome measure PSNHDD were negative, but at variance with other measures and patient treatment perceptions that may be relevant for interventional studies. These findings highlight the importance of understanding the most relevant outcomes to patients and incorporating and prioritizing patient-centered outcomes when assessing interventions for alcohol use disorder.
证明酒精使用障碍治疗具有临床意义的益处具有挑战性。
我们报告了一项为期 12 周、2 期、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的纳曲酮(1、2.5 或 10mg/d)治疗酒精使用障碍成人患者的研究结果(NCT00981617)。主要终点为第 5 至 12 周无大量饮酒日的受试者比例(PSNHDD);次要终点包括酒精摄入量、渴求感和患者自评结果。
共有 406 名患者纳入全分析集(安慰剂组 101 例,纳曲酮 1mg、2.5mg 和 10mg 治疗组各 104、100 和 101 例)。在第 5 至 12 周的 PSNHDD 方面,纳曲酮与安慰剂组之间无统计学差异。然而,观察到累积重度饮酒日发生率呈剂量依赖性下降(与安慰剂相比,纳曲酮 10mg/d 下降 41%,p<0.001;纳曲酮 2.5mg 和 1mg 分别下降 30%和 32%,p<0.05)。与安慰剂治疗相比,更多纳曲酮治疗的患者 WHO 饮酒风险水平下降≥2 个等级。与安慰剂相比,纳曲酮治疗组的酒精渴求感显著降低(纳曲酮 10mg:-38.2[标准误差:2.9]vs.安慰剂:-30.2[2.8];p=0.044)。在治疗反应患者整体评估(PGART)上,纳曲酮 10mg 在第 4、8 和 12 周时优于安慰剂(p<0.001,p<0.001,p<0.01,分别)。PGART 的改善与渴求感的降低和 WHO 风险水平的降低相关。
主要结局指标 PSNHDD 的结果为阴性,但与其他指标和患者治疗认知不一致,这些结果可能与干预性研究相关。这些发现强调了理解对患者最相关的结局以及在评估酒精使用障碍干预措施时纳入和优先考虑以患者为中心的结局的重要性。