Suppr超能文献

P 波和 QT 离散度与严重外周动脉疾病有关吗?

Are P Wave and QT Dispersions Related to Severe Peripheral Artery Disease?

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, İzmir Tınaztepe Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, İzmir Tınaztepe Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Med Sci Monit. 2018 Jul 28;24:5242-5246. doi: 10.12659/MSM.910107.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between P wave and QT dispersions (PWD and QTD) during the course of severe peripheral artery disease (PAD). MATERIAL AND METHODS We recruited 163 patients who underwent peripheral angiography (PA) between August 2011 and March 2017, and they were divided into 2 groups according to the severity of PAD on PA. PWD and QTD were investigated using 12-lead electrocardiograms. Group One consisted of patients diagnosed with <70% stenosis on PA, who eventually received medical treatment; Group Two consisted of patients diagnosed with ≥70% stenosis on PA, who eventually underwent surgery. RESULTS ROC curve analysis of the 2 groups demonstrated that PWD was significantly higher in Group Two (AUC: 0.913505; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.859365 to 0.951788; p<0.0001). The Youden index showed that a cut-off PWD value of >35 msn predicted a peripheral artery stenosis of ≥70% with a sensitivity of 88.89% and a specificity of 85.37% (+LR: 6.07, -LR: 0.13). Moreover, QTD was significantly higher in Group Two (AUC: 0.884749; 95% CI: 0.825489 to 0.929391; p<0.0001). Youden index showed that a cut-off QTD value of >75 msn predicted a peripheral artery stenosis of ≥70% with a sensitivity of 76.54% and a specificity of 85.37% (+LR: 5.23, -LR: 0.27). Comparison of ROC curves showed no difference in terms of predicting peripheral artery stenosis of ≥70% between PWD and QTD (p=0.3308). CONCLUSIONS Interpreting PWD and QTD offers a non-invasive and cost-effective assessment method for detecting patients at high risk for coronary artery disease in the context of severe PAD.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在评估严重外周动脉疾病(PAD)患者中 P 波和 QT 离散度(PWD 和 QTD)之间的关系。

材料与方法

我们招募了 163 名于 2011 年 8 月至 2017 年 3 月间接受外周血管造影(PA)的患者,并根据 PA 上 PAD 的严重程度将其分为 2 组。使用 12 导联心电图研究 PWD 和 QTD。第 1 组由 PA 诊断为<70%狭窄的患者组成,他们最终接受了药物治疗;第 2 组由 PA 诊断为≥70%狭窄的患者组成,他们最终接受了手术。

结果

两组的 ROC 曲线分析表明,第 2 组的 PWD 明显较高(AUC:0.913505;95%置信区间(CI):0.859365 至 0.951788;p<0.0001)。约登指数显示,截断值为>35msn 的 PWD 值预测外周动脉狭窄≥70%的灵敏度为 88.89%,特异性为 85.37%(+LR:6.07,-LR:0.13)。此外,第 2 组的 QTD 明显较高(AUC:0.884749;95%CI:0.825489 至 0.929391;p<0.0001)。约登指数显示,截断值为>75msn 的 QTD 值预测外周动脉狭窄≥70%的灵敏度为 76.54%,特异性为 85.37%(+LR:5.23,-LR:0.27)。ROC 曲线比较显示,PWD 和 QTD 预测外周动脉狭窄≥70%无差异(p=0.3308)。

结论

解释 PWD 和 QTD 为严重 PAD 患者中检测冠心病高危患者提供了一种非侵入性、具有成本效益的评估方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2cda/6078008/f4fd3b15733a/medscimonit-24-5242-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验