Lin Manxia, Xie Xiaoyan, Xu Ming, Feng Shiting, Tian Wenshuo, Zhuang Bowen, Su Liya, Ye Jieyi, Lin Jinhua, Liang Ping, Yu Jie, Kuang Ming
Division of Interventional Ultrasound, Department of Medical Ultrasonics, First Affiliated Hospital, Institute for the Study of Diagnostic and Interventional Ultrasound, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Radiology, First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018 Sep;44(9):1986-1995. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2018.05.018. Epub 2018 Jul 25.
The objective was to evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the assessment of the local efficacy after irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma 1 mo after ablation. Fifteen patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma were treated with IRE and then examined by contrast-enhanced ultrasound 1 mo after ablation. The contrast agent was SonoVue. Technical efficacy was assessed at 3 mo after IRE and classified as technical efficiency (TE) and technical inefficiency (TIE). Diagnostic performance was analyzed using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Ten patients were considered as having TE, and five, TIE. Complete non-enhancement was observed in seven ablation zones (70.0%) in the TE group, and peripheral heterogeneous enhancement, in all five ablation zones (100.0%) in the TIE group. The non-enhancement pattern differed significantly between the TE and TIE groups (p = 0.026), with significant correlation with technical efficacy (p = 0.007). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.85 (p = 0.008, 95% confidence interval: 0.65-1.05). A non-enhancement pattern using contrast-enhanced ultrasound was useful in the assessment of local efficacy after IRE ablation of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
目的是评估超声造影在不可逆电穿孔(IRE)消融胰腺腺癌1个月后评估局部疗效中的诊断价值。15例胰腺腺癌患者接受IRE治疗,然后在消融1个月后接受超声造影检查。造影剂为声诺维。在IRE治疗3个月后评估技术疗效,并分为技术有效(TE)和技术无效(TIE)。使用受试者操作特征曲线分析诊断性能。10例患者被认为技术有效,5例技术无效。在TE组的7个消融区(70.0%)观察到完全无增强,在TIE组的所有5个消融区(100.0%)观察到周边不均匀增强。TE组和TIE组之间的无增强模式差异有统计学意义(p = 0.026),与技术疗效显著相关(p = 0.007)。受试者操作特征曲线下面积为0.85(p = 0.008,95%置信区间:0.65 - 1.05)。超声造影的无增强模式在评估IRE消融胰腺腺癌后的局部疗效中是有用的。