Rodriguez Garcia L, Medina A, Modesto I Alapont V, Palacios Loro M L, Mayordomo-Colunga J, Vivanco-Allende A, Rey C
Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain.
Paediatric Intensive Care Unit, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain; CIBERes.
Med Intensiva (Engl Ed). 2019 Nov;43(8):474-479. doi: 10.1016/j.medin.2018.06.003. Epub 2018 Jul 27.
To evaluate the consequences of using nebulized drugs in patients subjected to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) with total face mask (TFM) and helmet.
A descriptive analytical study of a prospective patient cohort was carried out.
Pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) of a tertiary hospital.
Consecutive sampling was used to include all patients admitted to the PICU and requiring NIV with helmet or TFM over a period of 29 months. No patients were excluded.
Nebulized treatment was added according to medical criteria.
Independent variables were age, sex, diagnosis, disease severity, ventilation parameters and nebulized drugs (if administered). Secondary outcomes were duration and failure of NIV, and length of PICU stay.
The most frequent diagnoses were bronchiolitis (60.5%) and asthma (23%). Patients received NIV for a median of 43h. Nebulized drugs were administered in 40% of the cases during NIV, and no adverse effects were registered. Using Bayesian statistics, the calculated probability of suffering an adverse effect was 1.3% with helmet and 0.5% with TFM (high density 95% probability intervals). Patients with helmet and nebulized therapy were in more serious condition than those who did not receive nebulization; nevertheless, no differences were observed regarding the need to change to bilevel modality. With TFM, PICU stay was shorter for the same degree of severity (p=0.033), and the NIV failure rate was higher in patients who did not receive inhaled drugs (p=0.024).
The probability of suffering an adverse effect related to nebulization is extremely low when using a helmet or TFM. Inhaled therapy with TFM may shorten PICU stay in some patients.
评估在使用全面罩(TFM)和头盔进行无创通气(NIV)的患者中使用雾化药物的后果。
对前瞻性患者队列进行描述性分析研究。
一家三级医院的儿科重症监护病房(PICU)。
采用连续抽样纳入在29个月期间入住PICU并需要使用头盔或TFM进行NIV的所有患者。无患者被排除。
根据医学标准添加雾化治疗。
自变量为年龄、性别、诊断、疾病严重程度、通气参数和雾化药物(如果使用)。次要结局为NIV的持续时间和失败情况,以及PICU住院时间。
最常见的诊断为细支气管炎(60.5%)和哮喘(23%)。患者接受NIV的中位时间为43小时。40%的病例在NIV期间使用了雾化药物,未记录到不良反应。使用贝叶斯统计,使用头盔时发生不良反应的计算概率为1.3%,使用TFM时为0.5%(高密度95%概率区间)。接受头盔和雾化治疗的患者病情比未接受雾化治疗的患者更严重;然而,在改为双水平模式的必要性方面未观察到差异。使用TFM时,在相同严重程度下PICU住院时间更短(p = 0.033),未接受吸入药物治疗的患者NIV失败率更高(p = 0.024)。
使用头盔或TFM时,与雾化相关的不良反应概率极低。TFM吸入治疗可能会缩短部分患者的PICU住院时间。