• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

How placebo characteristics can influence estimates of intervention effects in trials.

作者信息

Howick Jeremy, Hoffmann Tammy

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Howick), University of Oxford, UK; Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice (Hoffmann), Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia

Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (Howick), University of Oxford, UK; Centre for Research in Evidence-Based Practice (Hoffmann), Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

CMAJ. 2018 Jul 30;190(30):E908-E911. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171400.

DOI:10.1503/cmaj.171400
PMID:30061325
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6066403/
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
How placebo characteristics can influence estimates of intervention effects in trials.安慰剂特征如何影响试验中干预效果的评估。
CMAJ. 2018 Jul 30;190(30):E908-E911. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.171400.
2
Re: challenges and recommendations for placebo controls in randomized trials in physical and rehabilitation medicine: a report of the International Placebo Symposium Working Group.关于：物理与康复医学随机试验中安慰剂对照的挑战与建议：国际安慰剂研讨会工作组报告
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Dec;89(12):1045-6; author reply 1046-7. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181fc7c20.
3
The globalization of health law: the case of permissibility of placebo-based research.
Am J Law Med. 2000;26(2-3):175-86.
4
Placebos used in clinical trials for Chinese herbal medicine.用于中药临床试验的安慰剂。
Recent Pat Inflamm Allergy Drug Discov. 2008 Jun;2(2):123-7. doi: 10.2174/187221308784543700.
5
I need a placebo like I need a hole in the head.
J Law Med Ethics. 2002 Spring;30(1):69-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2002.tb00721.x.
6
Echinacea for the common cold.紫锥菊用于治疗普通感冒。
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct 7;139(7):600; author reply 601. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00018.
7
Echinacea for the common cold.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct 7;139(7):601; author reply 601. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00020.
8
Echinacea for the common cold.
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct 7;139(7):600-1; author reply 601. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-139-7-200310070-00019.
9
Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials. Current issues and future directions.评估随机对照试验的质量。当前问题与未来方向。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996 Spring;12(2):195-208. doi: 10.1017/s0266462300009570.
10
The quality of placebos used in randomized, controlled trials of lumbar and pelvic joint thrust manipulation-a systematic review.随机对照试验中用于腰椎和骨盆关节推力手法的安慰剂质量-系统评价。
Spine J. 2017 Mar;17(3):445-456. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.11.003. Epub 2016 Nov 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of a Chokeberry ( (Michx.) Elliott) Supplementation on Cardiometabolic Outcomes: A Critical Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.黑果腺肋花楸（Aronia melanocarpa (Michx.) Elliott）补充剂对心脏代谢指标的影响：随机对照试验的批判性系统评价和荟萃分析。
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 28;17(9):1488. doi: 10.3390/nu17091488.
2
SPIRIT 2025 explanation and elaboration: updated guideline for protocols of randomised trials.《SPIRIT 2025解释与阐述：随机试验方案更新指南》
BMJ. 2025 Apr 28;389:e081660. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2024-081660.
3
Changes in the pharyngeal and nasal microbiota in pediatric patients with adenotonsillar hypertrophy.腺样体和扁桃体肥大患儿咽鼻微生物群的变化。
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Oct 3;12(10):e0072824. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00728-24. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
4
Most physical interventions for musculoskeletal pain in children and adolescents cannot be reproduced in clinical practice: a meta-research study of randomized clinical trials.大多数针对儿童和青少年肌肉骨骼疼痛的物理干预措施在临床实践中无法再现：一项随机临床试验的元研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Sep 2;25(1):698. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07668-8.
5
Patient reported outcomes and recruitment rates following the introduction of principled patient information leaflets (PrinciPILs): Protocol for a meta-analysis.引入原则性患者信息手册（PrinciPILs）后的患者报告结局及招募率：一项荟萃分析方案
NIHR Open Res. 2023 May 26;3:29. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13420.1. eCollection 2023.
6
Comment on Takakura et al. Acupuncture for Japanese Katakori (Chronic Neck Pain): A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Double-Blind Study. 2023, , 2141.评论 Takakura 等人的《日本慢性颈痛患者的针刺疗法：一项随机安慰剂对照双盲研究》。2023 年， ，2141 页。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 24;60(7):1030. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071030.
7
Risk factors associated with nocebo effects: A review of reviews.与反安慰剂效应相关的风险因素：综述之综述
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2024 May 22;38:100800. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2024.100800. eCollection 2024 Jul.
8
The Therapeutic Potential of Essential Oils in Managing Inflammatory Skin Conditions: A Scoping Review.精油在治疗炎症性皮肤病中的治疗潜力：一项范围综述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Apr 29;17(5):571. doi: 10.3390/ph17050571.
9
ACURATE: A guide for reporting sham controls in trials using acupuncture.ACURATE：针刺试验中假对照报告指南。
Integr Med Res. 2023 Jun;12(2):100955. doi: 10.1016/j.imr.2023.100955. Epub 2023 May 13.
10
Reporting quality of sham needles used as controls in acupuncture trials: a methodological evaluation.针刺试验中用作对照的假针的报告质量：方法学评价
Chin Med. 2022 May 31;17(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s13020-022-00608-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.共情和积极沟通在医疗保健咨询中的效果：系统评价和荟萃分析。
J R Soc Med. 2018 Jul;111(7):240-252. doi: 10.1177/0141076818769477. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
2
Informed consent and clinical trials: where is the placebo effect?知情同意与临床试验：安慰剂效应何在？
BMJ. 2017 Feb 3;356:j463. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j463.
3
Acupressure effect on sleep quality: A systematic review and meta-analysis. acupressure 对睡眠质量的影响：系统评价和荟萃分析。
Sleep Med Rev. 2018 Feb;37:24-34. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.12.004. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
4
Increasing uncertainty in CNS clinical trials: the role of placebo, nocebo, and Hawthorne effects.中枢神经系统临床试验中的不确定性增加：安慰剂、反安慰剂和霍桑效应的作用。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Jun;15(7):736-747. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00066-1. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
5
The matching quality of experimental and control interventions in blinded pharmacological randomised clinical trials: a methodological systematic review.盲法药理学随机临床试验中试验性干预措施与对照性干预措施的匹配质量：一项方法学系统评价
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016 Feb 13;16:18. doi: 10.1186/s12874-016-0111-9.
6
Use of placebo controls in the evaluation of surgery: systematic review.手术评估中安慰剂对照的使用：系统评价。
BMJ. 2014 May 21;348:g3253. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3253.
7
Oseltamivir for influenza in adults and children: systematic review of clinical study reports and summary of regulatory comments.奥司他韦治疗成人和儿童流感：临床研究报告的系统评价和监管意见摘要。
BMJ. 2014 Apr 9;348:g2545. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g2545.
8
Neuraminidase inhibitors for preventing and treating influenza in adults and children.用于预防和治疗成人及儿童流感的神经氨酸酶抑制剂。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Apr 10;2014(4):CD008965. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008965.pub4.
9
Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide.更好的干预措施报告：干预描述和复制（TIDieR）清单和指南模板。
BMJ. 2014 Mar 7;348:g1687. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g1687.
10
Poor description of non-pharmacological interventions: analysis of consecutive sample of randomised trials.非药物干预措施描述不佳：连续随机试验样本分析。
BMJ. 2013 Sep 10;347:f3755. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3755.