Suppr超能文献

髂分支装置治疗孤立性髂总动脉瘤的多中心pELVIS注册研究结果。

Results of the multicenter pELVIS Registry for isolated common iliac aneurysms treated by the iliac branch device.

作者信息

Fargion Aaron T, Masciello Fabrizio, Pratesi Carlo, Pratesi Giovanni, Torsello Giovanni, Donas Konstantinos P

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2018 Nov;68(5):1367-1373.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.02.032. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the short- and long-term results of off-label use of iliac branch devices (IBDs) in isolated common iliac artery aneurysms compared with the manufacturer-recommended configuration with additional extension in the infrarenal aorta based on the pELVIS Registry (pErformance of iLiac branch deVIces for aneurysmS involving the iliac bifurcation).

METHODS

Between January 2005 and April 2017, 804 patients underwent endovascular aneurysm repair with 910 IBDs owing to aneurysmal involvement of the iliac bifurcation in nine high-volume European vascular centers. Among this cohort, 231 IBDs were implanted in 207 patients to treat an isolated common iliac aneurysm; 91 IBDs (group 1) were implanted without proximal aortic extension in the infrarenal aorta, and in the remaining cases (n = 140; group 2) an aortic bifurcated stent graft was deployed proximally as stated in the instructions for use. Primary outcomes were IBD and target hypogastric artery occlusions, type I and III endoleaks, procedure-related reinterventions, and aneurysm-related deaths.

RESULTS

Technical success was achieved in 90 cases (98.9%) in group 1 versus 137 cases (97.8%) in group 2 (P = .55). The overall aneurysm-related early reintervention rate for the two groups was 4.4% (4 of 91) and 2.1% (3 of 140), respectively (P = .33). The 30-day mortality was 1.1% in group 1 (n = 1), and 0% in group 2 (P = .21). The median postoperative follow-up in groups 1 and 2 were 34.1 months (range, 1-108 months) and 17.5 months (range, 1-90 months), respectively. The estimated rates of freedom from IBD occlusion at 60 months were 86% in group 1 and 83% in group 2 (P = .69). The estimated rates of freedom from target hypogastric artery occlusion at 60 months were 98.3% in group 1 and 91.3% in group 2 (P = .45). The estimated freedom from reintervention rates at 60 months for types I, types III, and IBD stenosis-occlusion were 78.2% in group 1 and 79.9% in group 2 (P = .79). The estimated freedom from all cause reintervention at 60 months was 64.5% in group 1 and 66.1% in group 2 (P = .44). The estimated freedom from aneurysm-related death at 60 months was 97.9% in group 1 and 100% in group 2 (P = .83).

CONCLUSIONS

Single IBD placement for isolated common iliac artery aneurysms seems to be a safe and effective treatment option, when a proper anatomic patient selection is provided. Major benefits are represented by the decrease in X ray exposure, overall procedural time, and use of contrast medium, without affecting perioperative and long-term results in comparison with more extensive procedures.

摘要

目的

我们基于pELVIS注册研究(髂分支装置治疗累及髂总动脉分叉处动脉瘤的性能研究),评估了在孤立性髂总动脉瘤中使用髂分支装置(IBD)进行超适应证应用与制造商推荐的配置(在肾下腹主动脉进行额外延伸)相比的短期和长期结果。

方法

2005年1月至2017年4月期间,在9个高容量的欧洲血管中心,804例患者因髂总动脉分叉处动脉瘤接受了910次IBD血管内动脉瘤修复术。在该队列中,231个IBD被植入207例患者体内以治疗孤立性髂总动脉瘤;91个IBD(第1组)在肾下腹主动脉未进行近端主动脉延伸的情况下植入,其余病例(n = 140;第2组)按照使用说明书在近端部署了主动脉分叉型支架移植物。主要结局指标为IBD和目标髂内动脉闭塞、I型和III型内漏、与手术相关的再次干预以及与动脉瘤相关的死亡。

结果

第1组90例(98.9%)和第组组137例(97.8%)获得技术成功(P = 0.55)。两组与动脉瘤相关的总体早期再次干预率分别为4.4%(91例中的4例)和2.1%(140例中的3例)(P = 0.33)。第1组30天死亡率为1.1%(n = 1),第2组为0%(P = 0.21)。第1组和第2组术后中位随访时间分别为34.1个月(范围1 - 108个月)和17.5个月(范围1 - 90个月)。60个月时IBD无闭塞的估计发生率在第1组为86%,在第2组为83%(P = 0.69)。60个月时目标髂内动脉无闭塞的估计发生率在第1组为98.3%,在第2组为91.3%(P = 0.45)。60个月时I型、III型和IBD狭窄闭塞的再次干预无发生率在第1组为78.2%,在第2组为79.9%(P = 0.79)。60个月时所有原因再次干预无发生率在第1组为64.5%,在第2组为66.1%(P = 0.44)。60个月时与动脉瘤相关死亡无发生率在第1组为97.9%,在第2组为100%(P = 0.83)。

结论

当对患者进行适当的解剖学选择时,单独放置IBD治疗孤立性髂总动脉瘤似乎是一种安全有效的治疗选择。与更广泛的手术相比,主要益处在于减少了X线暴露、总体手术时间和造影剂的使用,且不影响围手术期和长期结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验