British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Department of Medicine, St. Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
J Urban Health. 2019 Feb;96(1):12-20. doi: 10.1007/s11524-018-0294-y.
We examined the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation of the Tenant Overdose Response Organizers program (TORO)-a tenant-led naloxone training and distribution intervention. This pilot project was implemented in privately owned single room occupancy (SRO) hotels that were disproportionately affected by overdose in Vancouver's Downtown Eastside (DTES) neighborhood. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 20 tenants who had participated in a TORO training session and administered naloxone to someone in their SRO hotel or had overdosed in their SRO hotel and received naloxone from another tenant. Focus groups were conducted with 15 peer workers who led the TORO program in their SRO building. Interviews and focus groups were transcribed and analyzed thematically. Ethnographic observation at SRO hotels involved in the intervention was also co-led with peer research assistants. Ten SROs were included in the study. The level of acceptability of the TORO program was high, with participants describing the urgency for an intervention amid the frequency of overdoses in their buildings. Overdose response training enhanced participants' knowledge and skills, and provided them a sense of recognition. Additionally, the TORO program was feasible in some buildings more than others. While it provided important training and engaged isolated tenants, there were structural barriers to program feasibility. The implementation of the TORO program was met with some successes in terms of its reach and community development, but participants also discussed a lack of emotional support due to overdose frequency, leading to burnout and vulnerability. Our findings suggest that the TORO program was affected by social, structural, and physical environmental constraints that impacted program feasibility and implementation. Despite these constraints, peer-led in-reach overdose response interventions are effective tools in addressing overdose risk in SROs. Future housing interventions should consider the intersecting pathways of overdose risk, including how these interventions may exacerbate other harms for people who use drugs. Further research should explore the impacts of environmental factors on overdose response interventions in other housing contexts.
我们考察了租户过量反应组织者项目(TORO)——一项由租户主导的纳洛酮培训和分发干预措施的可接受性、可行性和实施情况。该试点项目在温哥华市中心东区(DTES)街区受过量影响不成比例的私人拥有单间出租(SRO)酒店实施。对 20 名租户进行了半结构式定性访谈,这些租户参加了 TORO 培训课程,并在他们的 SRO 酒店向某人使用了纳洛酮,或者在他们的 SRO 酒店过量并从另一位租户那里接受了纳洛酮。还与引领 SRO 大楼 TORO 项目的 15 名同伴工人进行了焦点小组讨论。对访谈和焦点小组进行了主题分析。与同伴研究助理共同进行了参与干预的 SRO 酒店的民族志观察。研究包括 10 个 SRO。TORO 项目的可接受程度很高,参与者描述了在他们的大楼中频繁发生过量情况下采取干预措施的紧迫性。过量反应培训提高了参与者的知识和技能,并使他们感到认可。此外,该项目在某些建筑物中比其他建筑物更可行。虽然它提供了重要的培训,并使孤立的租户参与其中,但该项目在可行性方面存在结构障碍。TORO 项目在其覆盖面和社区发展方面取得了一些成功,但参与者也讨论了由于过量发生频率导致缺乏情感支持,从而导致倦怠和脆弱。我们的研究结果表明,TORO 项目受到社会、结构和物理环境限制的影响,这些限制影响了项目的可行性和实施。尽管存在这些限制,但同伴主导的内部过量反应干预措施是解决 SRO 中过量风险的有效工具。未来的住房干预措施应考虑过量风险的交叉途径,包括这些干预措施如何加剧吸毒者的其他伤害。进一步的研究应探索环境因素对其他住房背景下过量反应干预措施的影响。