Fleming Taylor, Boyd Jade, Gagnon Marilou, Kerr Thomas, McNeil Ryan
British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Interdisciplinary Studies Graduate Program, University of British Columbia, 270-2357 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada.
British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, 400-1045 Howe Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 2A9, Canada; Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, St. Paul's Hospital, 608-1081 Burrard Street, Vancouver, BC V6Z 1Y6, Canada.
Int J Drug Policy. 2024 Jun;128:104444. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2024.104444. Epub 2024 May 15.
Across North America most overdose deaths occur in housing, largely due to individuals using drugs alone. In cities, fatalities are disproportionately concentrated in low-income housing, including single room occupancy (SRO) housing. While research has highlighted how SROs operate as risk environments for various poor outcomes, there has been little attention to specific drug use practices (i.e., using alone) associated with overdose vulnerability in these spaces. This study explores how environmental contexts of SROs shape overdose risks, with specific attention to practices of using drugs alone.
In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 people who use drugs (PWUD) living in Vancouver SROs. Interviews covered topics such as social-structural environments of housing, drug use practices, and housing-based harm reduction. Thematic analysis drew on the intersectional risk environment framework.
Narratives positioned SROs as extensions of public space, with similar expectations of risks and behaviours as in public spaces. For some participants, using alone in their room was characterized as a practice in claiming privacy within the context of a public existence. Participants highlighted how certain features of SRO's social-structural environments were routinely leveraged against them (e.g., security cameras, staff surveillance), suggesting using alone as a tactic to minimize risks of hyper-surveillance and punitive policies. Further, participants discussed using alone as "safer," describing how this practice mitigated place-based risks of social-structural harms (e.g., violence, criminalization) in ways that eclipsed overdose risk.
Using drugs alone may be understood as a spatial negotiation of vulnerability to diverse harms produced by environmental contexts of SROs. Interventions accounting for broader contextual factors (e.g., improvements housing quality/quantity, providing a safer supply of drugs) that render using alone as instrumental to survival, and that reduce the implicit threat of punishment from intensive surveillance and control practices are critical to reduce vulnerability to overdose and other harms.
在北美,大多数药物过量死亡事件发生在住所内,主要原因是个人独自使用毒品。在城市中,死亡人数不成比例地集中在低收入住房,包括单人房间 occupancy(SRO)住房。虽然研究强调了 SRO 如何作为各种不良后果的风险环境运作,但很少有人关注与这些场所药物过量易感性相关的特定吸毒行为(即独自使用)。本研究探讨了 SRO 的环境背景如何塑造药物过量风险,特别关注独自使用毒品的行为。
对居住在温哥华 SRO 的 30 名吸毒者(PWUD)进行了深入的半结构化访谈。访谈涵盖了住房的社会结构环境、吸毒行为以及基于住房的减少伤害等主题。主题分析借鉴了交叉风险环境框架。
叙述将 SRO 定位为公共空间的延伸,对风险和行为的期望与公共空间相似。对于一些参与者来说,在自己房间里独自使用毒品被视为在公共存在的背景下争取隐私的行为。参与者强调了 SRO 社会结构环境的某些特征如何经常被用来对付他们(例如,安全摄像头、工作人员监视),这表明独自使用是一种将过度监视和惩罚性政策风险降至最低的策略。此外,参与者将独自使用描述为“更安全”,并描述了这种行为如何以超过药物过量风险的方式减轻基于场所的社会结构伤害(例如,暴力、定罪)风险。
独自使用毒品可被理解为对 SRO 环境背景所产生的各种伤害易感性的空间协商。考虑到更广泛背景因素(例如,改善住房质量/数量、提供更安全的毒品供应)的干预措施至关重要,这些因素使独自使用成为生存的手段,并减少密集监视和控制措施带来的隐性惩罚威胁,以降低药物过量和其他伤害的易感性。