Department of Diagnostic Radiology & Nuclear Medicine.
Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD.
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018 Nov;67(5):576-579. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000002117.
The aim of the study is to demonstrate the scout radiograph does not change patient management, alter planning, or contribute to interpretation of the outpatient pediatric upper gastrointestinal fluoroscopic examination (UGI).
We retrospectively reviewed 197 outpatient pediatric UGIs performed over a 2-year period. We performed a chart review on all patients to evaluate for potentially clinically significant findings on the scout radiograph. Scout findings were categorized into 4 groups: no new clinically significant findings (group 1), potentially clinically significant findings that were not directly addressed in the electronic medical record (group 2), incidental non-gastrointestinal (GI) findings that necessitated further workup, however, were later deemed insignificant (group 3), and clinically significant findings that changed patient GI management, altered the planning of the procedure, or contributed to the interpretation of the fluoroscopic study (group 4).
A total of 197 UGIs were analyzed. A significant majority of cases (97.0%) were classified into group 1. Three cases (1.5%) were classified into group 2 with findings not addressed in the medical record. Two cases (1.0%) were classified into group 3, which, after further workup, were deemed not clinically significant. One case (0.5%) was classified into group 4, which resulted in a change in patient GI management.
In our review, there was only 1 case in which the scout radiograph changed patient GI management, with moderate stool burden leading to a miralax cleanout, although there were no cases, which altered the planning of the procedure or contributed to the interpretation of the study. The scout radiograph can be omitted and/or substituted with the last image hold function to decrease radiation exposure.
本研究旨在证明透视并不会改变患者的管理方式、改变计划或有助于解释门诊儿科上消化道荧光检查(UGI)。
我们回顾性分析了 2 年内进行的 197 例门诊儿科 UGI。我们对所有患者进行了图表回顾,以评估透视中是否存在可能具有临床意义的新发现。透视结果分为 4 组:无新的具有临床意义的发现(第 1 组)、未在电子病历中直接提及的具有潜在临床意义的发现(第 2 组)、需要进一步检查但后来被认为无意义的偶然非胃肠道(GI)发现(第 3 组),以及改变患者 GI 管理、改变手术计划或有助于荧光检查结果解释的具有临床意义的发现(第 4 组)。
共分析了 197 例 UGI。绝大多数病例(97.0%)归入第 1 组。3 例(1.5%)归入第 2 组,这些发现未在病历中提及。2 例(1.0%)归入第 3 组,经进一步检查后被认为无临床意义。1 例(0.5%)归入第 4 组,这导致患者 GI 管理发生改变。
在我们的回顾中,只有 1 例透视改变了患者的 GI 管理,中度粪便负荷导致使用乳果糖清洁肠道,尽管没有改变手术计划或有助于解释研究结果的病例。可以省略透视或用最后一帧图像保持功能替代,以减少辐射暴露。