Scantling Dane, Kucejko Robert, Williamson John, Galvez Alvaro, Teichman Amanda, Gruner Ryan, Serniak Nicholas, McCracken Brendan
Hahnemann University Hospital, PA 19102, United States; The Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, PA 19102, United States.
Hahnemann University Hospital, PA 19102, United States; The Drexel University College of Medicine Philadelphia, PA 19102, United States.
Injury. 2019 Jan;50(1):54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2018.07.019. Epub 2018 Jul 29.
Most elderly trauma patients suffer blunt head injury and many utilize antithrombotic (AT) medications. The utility of delayed CT-head (D-CTH) in neurologically intact elderly patients using AT who have an intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) on presentation is unknown. We hypothesized that D-CTH would not alter clinical management and aimed to evaluate the role of D-CTH in this population.
A retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients ≥65 years sustaining blunt head injuries from January 2010 to July 2017 were identified using our level 1 trauma center database. AT-patients presenting with ICH who underwent D-CTH were included. Patients with worsened ICH were compared to those with stable to improved ICH on D-CTH. AT-patients were compared to a cohort of non-AT patients. Fisher's Exact and Mann-Whitney U tests were utilized and a power analysis conducted.
137 A T and 34 non-AT patients were identified. There was no difference in hemorrhage progression or appearance of new ICH. No patient had a change in management from D-CTH in either cohort. AT-patients were slightly older (p < 0.001), but cohorts were otherwise similar. 50 AT-patients with worsened ICH were compared to 87 with stable ICH. There was no difference in cohort demographics. Hemorrhage progression did not vary with type of AT used but did increase if multiple types of synchronous ICH were present (p < 0.001).
Our data supports abstaining from routine D-CTH of elderly ICH patients with an intact neurologic examination who are utilizing aspirin, clopidogrel or warfarin. Conclusions cannot be drawn regarding new oral anticoagulants (NOACs) given low enrollment. Further multicenter study is required to provide adequate power and detect small levels of management change.
大多数老年创伤患者遭受钝性头部损伤,且许多人使用抗血栓(AT)药物。对于在就诊时颅内出血(ICH)且神经功能完好的使用AT的老年患者,延迟头颅CT(D-CTH)的作用尚不清楚。我们假设D-CTH不会改变临床管理,并旨在评估D-CTH在该人群中的作用。
进行了一项回顾性队列研究。使用我们一级创伤中心数据库确定2010年1月至2017年7月期间遭受钝性头部损伤的65岁及以上患者。纳入接受D-CTH检查且出现ICH的AT患者。将ICH恶化的患者与D-CTH检查显示ICH稳定或改善的患者进行比较。将AT患者与非AT患者队列进行比较。采用Fisher精确检验和Mann-Whitney U检验,并进行了功效分析。
确定了137例AT患者和34例非AT患者。出血进展或新ICH的出现没有差异。两个队列中均没有患者因D-CTH而改变治疗方案。AT患者年龄稍大(p<0.001),但队列在其他方面相似。将50例ICH恶化的AT患者与87例ICH稳定的患者进行比较。队列人口统计学特征没有差异。出血进展不因使用的AT类型而异,但如果存在多种同步ICH,则出血进展会增加(p<0.001)。
我们的数据支持对于正在使用阿司匹林、氯吡格雷或华法林且神经检查完好的老年ICH患者不进行常规D-CTH检查。由于入组人数少,无法就新型口服抗凝剂(NOACs)得出结论。需要进一步的多中心研究以提供足够的效力并检测出微小的治疗方案变化。