• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊剖腹手术质量改进方案的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement bundle for emergency laparotomy.

作者信息

Ebm C, Aggarwal G, Huddart S, Cecconi M, Quiney N

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and General Management Wiener Privatklinik (WPK) Vienna Vienna Austria.

Department of Anaesthesia Royal Surrey County Hospital Guildford UK.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2018 Jun 14;2(4):262-269. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.62. eCollection 2018 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/bjs5.62
PMID:30079396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6069361/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recent Emergency Laparotomy Pathway Quality Improvement Care (ELPQuiC) study showed that the use of a specific care bundle reduced mortality in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. However, the costs of implementation of the ELPQuiC bundle remain unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the in-hospital and societal costs of implementing the ELPQuiC bundle.

METHODS

The ELPQuiC study employed a before-after approach using quality improvement methodology. To assess the costs and cost-effectiveness of the bundle, two models were constructed: a short-term model to assess in-hospital costs and a long-term model (societal decision tree) to evaluate the patient's lifetime costs (in euros).

RESULTS

Using health economic modelling and data collected from the ELPQuiC study, estimated costs for initial implementation of the ELPQuiC bundle were €30 026·11 (range 1794·64-40 784·06) per hospital. In-hospital costs per patient were estimated at €14 817·24 for standard (non-care bundle) treatment versus €15 971·24 for the ELPQuiC bundle treatment. Taking a societal perspective, lifetime costs of the patient in the standard group were €23 058·87, compared with €19 102·37 for patients receiving the ELPQuiC bundle. The increased life expectancy of 4 months for patients treated with the ELPQuiC bundle was associated with cost savings of €11 410·38 per quality-adjusted life-year saved.

CONCLUSION

Implementation of the ELPQuiC bundle is associated with lower mortality and higher in-hospital costs but reduced societal costs.

摘要

背景

近期的急诊剖腹手术路径质量改进护理(ELPQuiC)研究表明,使用特定的护理包可降低急诊剖腹手术患者的死亡率。然而,实施ELPQuiC护理包的成本仍不清楚。本研究的目的是评估实施ELPQuiC护理包的住院成本和社会成本。

方法

ELPQuiC研究采用前后对照方法并运用质量改进方法。为评估护理包的成本和成本效益,构建了两个模型:一个短期模型用于评估住院成本,一个长期模型(社会决策树)用于评估患者的终身成本(以欧元计)。

结果

利用健康经济模型和从ELPQuiC研究中收集的数据,估计每家医院最初实施ELPQuiC护理包的成本为30026.11欧元(范围为1794.64 - 40784.06欧元)。标准(非护理包)治疗的每位患者住院成本估计为14817.24欧元,而ELPQuiC护理包治疗的为15971.24欧元。从社会角度看,标准组患者的终身成本为23058.87欧元,接受ELPQuiC护理包的患者为19102.37欧元。接受ELPQuiC护理包治疗的患者预期寿命增加4个月,与每挽救一个质量调整生命年节省11410.38欧元的成本相关。

结论

实施ELPQuiC护理包与较低的死亡率和较高的住院成本相关,但社会成本降低。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eae/6069361/51d3266ce2b9/BJS5-2-262-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eae/6069361/5ce28453cdad/BJS5-2-262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eae/6069361/fd5e83877fc0/BJS5-2-262-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eae/6069361/51d3266ce2b9/BJS5-2-262-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eae/6069361/5ce28453cdad/BJS5-2-262-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eae/6069361/fd5e83877fc0/BJS5-2-262-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5eae/6069361/51d3266ce2b9/BJS5-2-262-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of a quality improvement bundle for emergency laparotomy.急诊剖腹手术质量改进方案的成本效益
BJS Open. 2018 Jun 14;2(4):262-269. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.62. eCollection 2018 Aug.
2
Use of a pathway quality improvement care bundle to reduce mortality after emergency laparotomy.使用路径质量改进护理包降低急诊剖腹手术后的死亡率。
Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(1):57-66. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9658. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
3
Estimated costs before, during and after the introduction of the emergency laparotomy pathway quality improvement care (ELPQuIC) bundle.引入紧急剖腹手术路径质量改进护理(ELPQuIC)包前后的预估成本。
Anaesthesia. 2016 Nov;71(11):1291-1295. doi: 10.1111/anae.13623. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
Does the Implementation of a Quality Improvement Care Bundle Reduce the Incidence of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy?实施质量改进护理包能否降低急诊剖腹手术患者急性肾损伤的发生率?
J Clin Med. 2019 Aug 20;8(8):1265. doi: 10.3390/jcm8081265.
5
6
Evaluation of the Collaborative Use of an Evidence-Based Care Bundle in Emergency Laparotomy.评价基于循证的护理捆绑在急诊剖腹术中的联合应用。
JAMA Surg. 2019 May 1;154(5):e190145. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.0145. Epub 2019 May 15.
7
Implementing a thermal care bundle for inadvertent perioperative hypothermia: A cost-effectiveness analysis.实施意外围手术期低体温护理包:成本效益分析。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Sep;97:21-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.04.017. Epub 2019 May 4.
8
Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of the ABCDE Bundle: Impact of Bundle Adherence on Inpatient and 1-Year Mortality and Costs of Care.评估 ABCDE 包的成本效益:对住院和 1 年死亡率以及护理成本的影响。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):1752-1759. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004609.
9
[Cost-effectiveness analysis of schizophrenic patient care settings: impact of an atypical antipsychotic under long-acting injection formulation].[精神分裂症患者护理环境的成本效益分析:长效注射制剂下非典型抗精神病药物的影响]
Encephale. 2005 Mar-Apr;31(2):235-46. doi: 10.1016/s0013-7006(05)82390-5.
10
Estimating the Societal Benefits of THA After Accounting for Work Status and Productivity: A Markov Model Approach.在考虑工作状态和生产力后评估全髋关节置换术的社会效益:一种马尔可夫模型方法。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 Dec;474(12):2645-2654. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5084-9. Epub 2016 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Medicine Perspectives on Quality of Life Outcomes After Emergency Laparotomy: A Systematic Review.急诊剖腹手术后生活质量结局的急诊医学视角:一项系统综述。
Cureus. 2025 Jun 2;17(6):e85223. doi: 10.7759/cureus.85223. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Key interventions and outcomes in perioperative care pathways in emergency laparotomy: a systematic review.急诊剖腹手术围手术期护理路径中的关键干预措施及结果:一项系统评价
World J Emerg Surg. 2025 Mar 10;20(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s13017-025-00597-4.

本文引用的文献

1
Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England.重视与健康相关的生活质量:英国的EQ-5D-5L价值集。
Health Econ. 2018 Jan;27(1):7-22. doi: 10.1002/hec.3564. Epub 2017 Aug 22.
2
Cost-effectiveness in goal-directed therapy: are the dollars spent worth the value?目标导向治疗中的成本效益:所花费的金钱是否物有所值?
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014 Dec;28(6):1660-6. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2014.07.009.
3
Use of a pathway quality improvement care bundle to reduce mortality after emergency laparotomy.使用路径质量改进护理包降低急诊剖腹手术后的死亡率。
Br J Surg. 2015 Jan;102(1):57-66. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9658. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
4
Standards for definitions and use of outcome measures for clinical effectiveness research in perioperative medicine: European Perioperative Clinical Outcome (EPCO) definitions: a statement from the ESA-ESICM joint taskforce on perioperative outcome measures.围手术期医学临床有效性研究结局指标的定义和使用标准:欧洲围手术期临床结局(EPCO)定义:欧洲麻醉学会-欧洲重症监护医学学会围手术期结局指标联合工作组声明
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Feb;32(2):88-105. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000118.
5
A cost-effectiveness analysis of postoperative goal-directed therapy for high-risk surgical patients.高风险手术患者术后目标导向治疗的成本效果分析。
Crit Care Med. 2014 May;42(5):1194-203. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000164.
6
Current UK practice in emergency laparotomy.英国目前急诊剖腹手术的做法。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013 Nov;95(8):599-603. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2013.95.8.599.
7
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)--explanation and elaboration: a report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force.健康经济评估报告标准(CHEERS)——解释与说明:国际卫生经济学会健康经济评估报告指南良好报告实践工作组报告。
Value Health. 2013 Mar-Apr;16(2):231-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.02.002.
8
Variation in costs of emergency laparotomy following a multicentre national audit.
Anaesthesia. 2012 Oct;67(10):1173-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2012.07288.x.
9
Incidence and estimated annual cost of emergency laparotomy in England: is there a major funding shortfall?英格兰急诊剖腹手术的发病率和估计年费用:是否存在重大资金短缺?
Anaesthesia. 2012 May;67(5):474-478. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.07046.x.
10
Functional disability 5 years after acute respiratory distress syndrome.急性呼吸窘迫综合征 5 年后的功能障碍。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Apr 7;364(14):1293-304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1011802.