• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在当前临床实践中,急性心肌梗死后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,β受体阻滞剂是用于心力衰竭治疗还是二级预防?一项初步研究。

In Current Clinical Practice, after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Are β-Blockers Prescribed for Heart Failure or as Secondary Prevention? A Pilot Study.

作者信息

Ruddox Vidar, Otterstad Jan Erik, Atar Dan, Bendz Bjørn, Edvardsen Thor

机构信息

Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tonsberg, Norway.

Oslo University Hospital, Div. of Cardiology, Dept. of Medicine, and Div. of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Clinic, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Cardiology. 2018;140(3):152-154. doi: 10.1159/000490656. Epub 2018 Aug 8.

DOI:10.1159/000490656
PMID:30089282
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Patients surviving an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are different today than when oral β-blockers first were shown to have an incremental effect on mortality. They are now, as opposed to then, offered revascularization procedures and effective secondary prevention. In this pilot-study, we aimed to explore the prescription of β-blockers to these patients stratified by their left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS

Consecutive stable patients treated with a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedure following an AMI were included for measurement of LVEF after 1-5 days. β-Blocker treatment was recorded at inclusion and after 3 months.

RESULTS

We included 159 patients, 89% with LVEF ≥40% (56% had a LVEF ≥50% [preserved], 33% LVEF 40-49% [mid-range] and 11% LVEF <40% [reduced]). At discharge the prescription rates of β-blockers according to LVEF stratification were 79% for preserved, 79% for mid-range and 94% for reduced LVEF. After 3 months 72% of all patients continued such treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In this prospective study, a large proportion of contemporary managed patients with AMI but without clinical heart failure does not have reduced LVEF shortly after PCI, but the majority is still treated with a β-blocker.

摘要

目的

与首次证明口服β受体阻滞剂对死亡率有递增效应时相比,如今急性心肌梗死(AMI)存活患者的情况已有所不同。与那时相反,他们现在接受了血运重建手术和有效的二级预防。在这项初步研究中,我们旨在探讨根据左心室射血分数(LVEF)分层后,这些患者使用β受体阻滞剂的处方情况。

方法

纳入在AMI后接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的连续稳定患者,在1至5天后测量LVEF。在纳入时和3个月后记录β受体阻滞剂治疗情况。

结果

我们纳入了159例患者,89%的患者LVEF≥40%(56%的患者LVEF≥50%[保留],33%的患者LVEF为40 - 49%[中等范围],11%的患者LVEF<40%[降低])。出院时,根据LVEF分层,β受体阻滞剂的处方率在LVEF保留患者中为79%,中等范围患者中为79%,降低患者中为94%。3个月后,所有患者中有72%继续接受此类治疗。

结论

在这项前瞻性研究中,很大一部分当代接受管理的AMI患者且无临床心力衰竭,在PCI后不久LVEF并未降低,但大多数患者仍接受β受体阻滞剂治疗。

相似文献

1
In Current Clinical Practice, after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction, Are β-Blockers Prescribed for Heart Failure or as Secondary Prevention? A Pilot Study.在当前临床实践中,急性心肌梗死后经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后,β受体阻滞剂是用于心力衰竭治疗还是二级预防?一项初步研究。
Cardiology. 2018;140(3):152-154. doi: 10.1159/000490656. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
2
Effects of β-blockers on left ventricular remodeling in patients with preserved ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction.β受体阻滞剂对急性心肌梗死后射血分数保留患者左心室重构的影响。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 15;221:765-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.123. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
3
BEtablocker Treatment After acute Myocardial Infarction in revascularized patients without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (BETAMI): Rationale and design of a prospective, randomized, open, blinded end point study.贝他阻滞剂治疗血运重建后左心室射血分数未降低的急性心肌梗死患者(BETAMI):一项前瞻性、随机、开放、盲终点研究的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2019 Feb;208:37-46. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.10.005. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
4
Design and rationale of the Danish trial of beta-blocker treatment after myocardial infarction without reduced ejection fraction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.丹麦试验:心肌梗死后无射血分数降低的β受体阻滞剂治疗的设计和原理:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 May 23;21(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4214-6.
5
Impact of oral beta-blocker therapy on mortality after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for Killip class 1 myocardial infarction.口服β受体阻滞剂治疗对Killip 1级心肌梗死患者直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后死亡率的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2016 May;31(5):687-93. doi: 10.1007/s00380-015-0673-1. Epub 2015 Apr 12.
6
Evaluation of acute myocardial infarction patients with mid-range ejection fraction after emergency percutaneous coronary intervention.评估急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后射血分数处于中间范围的急性心肌梗死患者。
Postgrad Med J. 2019 Jul;95(1125):355-360. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2018-136334. Epub 2019 May 25.
7
Predictors, Trends, and Outcomes (Among Older Patients ≥65 Years of Age) Associated With Beta-Blocker Use in Patients With Stable Angina Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the NCDR Registry.与接受择期经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的稳定型心绞痛患者中使用β受体阻滞剂相关的预测因素、趋势和结局(年龄≥65 岁的老年患者):来自 NCDR 注册研究的结果。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Aug 22;9(16):1639-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2016.05.048.
8
Lack of effect of oral beta-blocker therapy at discharge on long-term clinical outcomes of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction after primary percutaneous coronary intervention.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 ST 段抬高型急性心肌梗死患者出院时口服β受体阻滞剂治疗对长期临床结局无影响。
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Nov 1;106(9):1225-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2010.06.048. Epub 2010 Sep 9.
9
Clinical impact of beta-blockers at discharge on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with non-reduced ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction.急性心肌梗死后射血分数未降低患者出院时β受体阻滞剂对长期临床结局的临床影响。
J Cardiol. 2023 Jan;81(1):83-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2022.08.002. Epub 2022 Aug 20.
10
Effect of beta-blocker therapy in patients with or without left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction.β受体阻滞剂治疗急性心肌梗死后伴或不伴有左心室收缩功能障碍患者的效果。
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2021 Nov 3;7(6):475-482. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaa029.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic impact of non-improvement of global longitudinal strain in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction.经血运重建的急性心肌梗死患者的整体纵向应变无改善的预后影响。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021 Dec;37(12):3477-3487. doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02349-2. Epub 2021 Jul 29.
2
The impact of semi-automatic versus manually adjusted assessment of global longitudinal strain in post-myocardial infarction patients.心肌梗死后患者中半自动与手动调整评估整体纵向应变的影响。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020 Jul;36(7):1283-1290. doi: 10.1007/s10554-020-01826-4. Epub 2020 Mar 31.