Chandramohan Suganya, Navalkele Bhagyashri, Mushtaq Ammara, Krishna Amar, Kacir John, Chopra Teena
Division of Infectious Diseases, Detroit Medical Center/Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Department of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center/Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Jul 26;5(7):ofy156. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy156. eCollection 2018 Jul.
Prolonged central line (CL) and urinary catheter (UC) use can increase risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI).
This interventional study conducted in a 76-bed long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) in Southeast Michigan was divided into 3 periods: pre-intervention (January 2015-June 2015), intervention (July-November 2015), and postintervention (December 2015-March 2017). During the intervention period, a multidisciplinary infection prevention team (MIPT) made weekly recommendations to remove unnecessary CL/UC or switch to alternate urinary/intravenous access. Device utilization ratios (DURs) and infection rates were compared between the study periods. Interrupted time series (ITS) and 0-inflated poisson (ZIP) regression were used to analyze DUR and CLABSI/CAUTI data, respectively.
UC-DUR was 31% in the pre- and postintervention periods and 21% in the intervention period. CL-DUR decreased from 46% (pre-intervention) to 39% (intervention) to 37% (postintervention). The results of ITS analysis indicated nonsignificant decrease and increase in level/trend in DURs coinciding with our intervention. The CAUTI rate per catheter-days did not decrease during intervention (4.36) compared with pre- (2.49) and postintervention (1.93). The CLABSI rate per catheter-days decreased by 73% during intervention (0.39) compared with pre-intervention (1.45). Rates again quadrupled postintervention (1.58). ZIP analysis indicated a beneficial effect of intervention on infection rates without reaching statistical significance.
We demonstrated that a workable MIPT initiative focusing on removal of unnecessary CL and UC can be easily implemented in an LTACH requiring minimal time and resources. A rebound increase in UC-DURs to pre-intervention levels after intervention end indicates that continued vigilance is required to maintain performance.
长期使用中心静脉导管(CL)和导尿管(UC)会增加中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)和导尿管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)的风险。
这项干预性研究在密歇根州东南部一家拥有76张床位的长期急性护理医院(LTACH)进行,分为3个阶段:干预前(2015年1月至2015年6月)、干预期(2015年7月至11月)和干预后(2015年12月至2017年3月)。在干预期间,一个多学科感染预防团队(MIPT)每周提出建议,以移除不必要的CL/UC或改用其他尿路/静脉通路。比较各研究阶段的设备使用率(DUR)和感染率。分别使用中断时间序列(ITS)和零膨胀泊松(ZIP)回归分析DUR和CLABSI/CAUTI数据。
UC-DUR在干预前和干预后阶段为31%,在干预期为21%。CL-DUR从46%(干预前)降至39%(干预期)再降至37%(干预后)。ITS分析结果表明,与我们的干预措施一致,DUR的水平/趋势出现了不显著的下降和上升。与干预前(2.49)和干预后(1.93)相比,干预期间每导管日的CAUTI率没有下降(4.36)。与干预前(1.45)相比,干预期间每导管日的CLABSI率下降了73%(0.39)。干预后该率再次增至四倍(1.58)。ZIP分析表明干预对感染率有有益影响,但未达到统计学显著性。
我们证明,在LTACH中,一项关注移除不必要CL和UC的可行的MIPT举措可以轻松实施,所需时间和资源极少。干预结束后UC-DUR反弹至干预前水平,这表明需要持续保持警惕以维持成效。