Suppr超能文献

多学科感染预防倡议对长期急性护理医院中心静脉导管和导尿管使用情况的影响。

Impact of a Multidisciplinary Infection Prevention Initiative on Central Line and Urinary Catheter Utilization in a Long-term Acute Care Hospital.

作者信息

Chandramohan Suganya, Navalkele Bhagyashri, Mushtaq Ammara, Krishna Amar, Kacir John, Chopra Teena

机构信息

Division of Infectious Diseases, Detroit Medical Center/Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

Department of Internal Medicine, Detroit Medical Center/Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Jul 26;5(7):ofy156. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy156. eCollection 2018 Jul.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prolonged central line (CL) and urinary catheter (UC) use can increase risk of central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) and catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI).

METHODS

This interventional study conducted in a 76-bed long-term acute care hospital (LTACH) in Southeast Michigan was divided into 3 periods: pre-intervention (January 2015-June 2015), intervention (July-November 2015), and postintervention (December 2015-March 2017). During the intervention period, a multidisciplinary infection prevention team (MIPT) made weekly recommendations to remove unnecessary CL/UC or switch to alternate urinary/intravenous access. Device utilization ratios (DURs) and infection rates were compared between the study periods. Interrupted time series (ITS) and 0-inflated poisson (ZIP) regression were used to analyze DUR and CLABSI/CAUTI data, respectively.

RESULTS

UC-DUR was 31% in the pre- and postintervention periods and 21% in the intervention period. CL-DUR decreased from 46% (pre-intervention) to 39% (intervention) to 37% (postintervention). The results of ITS analysis indicated nonsignificant decrease and increase in level/trend in DURs coinciding with our intervention. The CAUTI rate per catheter-days did not decrease during intervention (4.36) compared with pre- (2.49) and postintervention (1.93). The CLABSI rate per catheter-days decreased by 73% during intervention (0.39) compared with pre-intervention (1.45). Rates again quadrupled postintervention (1.58). ZIP analysis indicated a beneficial effect of intervention on infection rates without reaching statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated that a workable MIPT initiative focusing on removal of unnecessary CL and UC can be easily implemented in an LTACH requiring minimal time and resources. A rebound increase in UC-DURs to pre-intervention levels after intervention end indicates that continued vigilance is required to maintain performance.

摘要

背景

长期使用中心静脉导管(CL)和导尿管(UC)会增加中心静脉导管相关血流感染(CLABSI)和导尿管相关尿路感染(CAUTI)的风险。

方法

这项干预性研究在密歇根州东南部一家拥有76张床位的长期急性护理医院(LTACH)进行,分为3个阶段:干预前(2015年1月至2015年6月)、干预期(2015年7月至11月)和干预后(2015年12月至2017年3月)。在干预期间,一个多学科感染预防团队(MIPT)每周提出建议,以移除不必要的CL/UC或改用其他尿路/静脉通路。比较各研究阶段的设备使用率(DUR)和感染率。分别使用中断时间序列(ITS)和零膨胀泊松(ZIP)回归分析DUR和CLABSI/CAUTI数据。

结果

UC-DUR在干预前和干预后阶段为31%,在干预期为21%。CL-DUR从46%(干预前)降至39%(干预期)再降至37%(干预后)。ITS分析结果表明,与我们的干预措施一致,DUR的水平/趋势出现了不显著的下降和上升。与干预前(2.49)和干预后(1.93)相比,干预期间每导管日的CAUTI率没有下降(4.36)。与干预前(1.45)相比,干预期间每导管日的CLABSI率下降了73%(0.39)。干预后该率再次增至四倍(1.58)。ZIP分析表明干预对感染率有有益影响,但未达到统计学显著性。

结论

我们证明,在LTACH中,一项关注移除不必要CL和UC的可行的MIPT举措可以轻松实施,所需时间和资源极少。干预结束后UC-DUR反弹至干预前水平,这表明需要持续保持警惕以维持成效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ece/6061847/d84fdedbccb7/ofy15603.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验