Perdry Hervé, Gutzkow Kristine B, Chevalier Marianne, Huc Laurence, Brunborg Gunnar, Boutet-Robinet Elisa
Univ Paris-Saclay & INSERM CESP, Villejuif, France.
Department of Molecular Biology, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Environ Mol Mutagen. 2018 Aug;59(7):595-602. doi: 10.1002/em.22204. Epub 2018 Aug 9.
Even if the comet assay has been widely used for decades, there is still a need for controlled studies and good mathematical models to assess the variability of the different versions of this assay and in particular to assess potential intra-experimental variability of the high-throughput comet assay. To address this point, we further validate a high-throughput comet assay that uses hydrophilic polyester film (Gelbond®). Experiments were performed using human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) either untreated or treated with different concentration of MMS (methyl methanesulfonate). A positive control for the Fpg (Formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase)-modified comet assay (Ro 19-8022 with light) was also included. To quantify the sources of variability of the assay, including intradeposit variability, instead of summarizing DNA damage on 50 cells from a deposit by the mean or median of their percentage DNA tail, we analyzed all logit-transformed data with a linear mixed model. The main source of variation in our experimental data is between cells within the same deposit, suggesting genuine variability in the response of the cells rather than variation caused by technical treatment of cell samples. The second source of variation is the inter-experimental variation (day-to-day experiment); the coefficient of this variation for the control was 13.6%. The variation between deposits in the same experiment is negligible. Moreover, there is no systematic bias because of the position of samples on the Gelbond film nor the position of the films in the electrophoresis tank. This high-throughput comet assay is thus reliable for various applications. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 59:595-602, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
即使彗星试验已经广泛使用了几十年,但仍需要进行对照研究并建立良好的数学模型,以评估该试验不同版本的变异性,特别是评估高通量彗星试验潜在的实验内变异性。为解决这一问题,我们进一步验证了一种使用亲水性聚酯薄膜(Gelbond®)的高通量彗星试验。实验使用未处理或用不同浓度甲磺酸甲酯(MMS)处理的人外周血单核细胞(PBMC)进行。还纳入了Fpg(甲酰胺嘧啶DNA糖基化酶)修饰彗星试验的阳性对照(Ro 19 - 8022加光)。为了量化试验变异性的来源,包括沉积内变异性,我们没有通过其DNA尾百分比的均值或中位数来总结来自一个沉积的50个细胞的DNA损伤,而是用线性混合模型分析了所有经对数转换的数据。我们实验数据的主要变异来源是同一沉积内的细胞之间,这表明细胞反应存在真正的变异性,而非细胞样品技术处理导致的变异。第二个变异来源是实验间变异(日常实验);对照组的该变异系数为13.6%。同一实验中沉积之间的变异可忽略不计。此外,由于样品在Gelbond膜上的位置或膜在电泳槽中的位置,不存在系统偏差。因此,这种高通量彗星试验在各种应用中都是可靠的。《环境与分子突变》,2018年,第59卷,第595 - 602页。© 2018威利期刊公司