A comparison of the imaging features of pleomorphic and classical invasive lobular carcinoma.

PURPOSE

Pleomorphic invasive lobular carcinoma (pILC) is a distinct morphological variant of ILC with a poorer prognosis than classical ILC (cILC). The aim of this study was to ascertain whether the conventional imaging appearances of the two entities differ.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of conventional imaging was undertaken in 150 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed ILC (38 pILC; 112 cILC) between April 2010 and July 2015. Mammographic and sonographic findings were evaluated using the BI-RADS lexicon by a radiologist blinded to pathology, and the findings in the two groups were compared. The degree of discrepancy between imaging and pathological sizing in the two groups was evaluated.

RESULTS

Lesions were mammographically occult in 11% of pILC and 14% of cILC (p = 0.56). On mammography, skin or trabecular thickening and microcalcification were commoner in pILC than cILC (13% vs. 1%, p < 0.01; 25% vs. 5%, p < 0.01). Architectural distortion was more frequent in cILC than pILC (26% vs. 9%, p = 0.01). On ultrasound, pILC more frequently exhibited mixed echogenicity (28% vs. 13%; p = 0.04), skin thickening, subcutaneous or parenchymal edema (8% vs. 0%; p = 0.02), echogenic surrounding fat (33% vs. 9%; p < 0.01), and posterior acoustic enhancement (10% vs. 1%; p = 0.02) than cILC. CILC was more frequently manifested as a focal area of altered echogenicity (24% vs. 8%; p = 0.04). Mean elastography stiffness was higher for pILC (174.8 vs. 124.6 kPa; p = 0.02). Imaging-pathological size disparity was similar for both subtypes.

CONCLUSION

There are differences in the imaging features between pILC and cILC which reflect the more aggressive nature of pILC.