Monopoli W John, Myers Rachel K, Paskewich Brooke S, Bevans Katherine B, Fein Joel A
Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA.
Violence Prevention Initiative, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2021 May;36(9-10):4771-4786. doi: 10.1177/0886260518792988. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
Hospital-based violence intervention programs (HVIPs) engage individuals who have experienced violent victimization in postmedical care programming, with the goal of reducing the incidence and impact of future injuries. Although there is some empirical support for HVIPs' impact on violence and crime-related outcomes, proper impact assessment is limited by a lack of systematized research on outcomes that relate to the proximal goals and activities of the programs themselves. To address this critical gap, we conducted a two-stage Delphi method to elicit and prioritize these outcomes using the wisdom and experience of those who are engaged in service delivery (i.e., HVIP community-based practitioners, program coordinators, and embedded researchers; = 79). Through this process, respondents prioritized outcomes related to posttraumatic stress symptoms, beliefs about aggression, coping strategies, and emotional regulation, which have not been consistently measured using validated or standardized tools. Results suggest that, rather than limiting program outcomes to those related to repeat violent injury or criminality, hospital- and community-based violence prevention programs seek to improve and measure mental health and socioemotional outcomes as a benchmark for healing and recovery after a violent injury. Prioritization of these outcomes broadens the definition of recovery to include psychosocial health and well-being. In addition, inclusion of these outcomes in effectiveness studies will serve to bolster the relevance of findings, and provide support for continued development and refinement of HVIP practice.
以医院为基础的暴力干预项目(HVIPs)让经历过暴力受害的个体参与医疗后护理项目,目标是降低未来受伤的发生率和影响。尽管有一些实证支持HVIPs对暴力及与犯罪相关结果的影响,但由于缺乏对与项目本身的近端目标和活动相关结果的系统性研究,恰当的影响评估受到限制。为解决这一关键差距,我们采用两阶段德尔菲法,利用从事服务提供工作的人员(即基于社区的HVIP从业者、项目协调员和嵌入式研究人员;n = 79)的智慧和经验,引出这些结果并确定其优先级。通过这一过程,受访者将与创伤后应激症状、对攻击的信念、应对策略和情绪调节相关的结果列为优先事项,而这些结果尚未一直使用经过验证或标准化的工具进行测量。结果表明,医院和社区层面的暴力预防项目并非将项目结果局限于与重复性暴力伤害或犯罪相关的结果,而是寻求改善和衡量心理健康及社会情感结果,将其作为暴力伤害后康复的基准。对这些结果进行优先级排序拓宽了康复的定义,使其包括心理社会健康和幸福。此外,将这些结果纳入有效性研究将有助于增强研究结果的相关性,并为HVIP实践的持续发展和完善提供支持。