1 Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, Georgia, USA.
Qual Health Res. 2018 Dec;28(14):2183-2194. doi: 10.1177/1049732318792505. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
Recent increases in childhood vaccine exemption rates are a source of concern within the public health community. Drawing from the health belief model and in-depth interviews with 50 mothers ( n = 50) who refused one or more vaccine, the aim of this study was to identify the specific reasons and the broader decision context(s) that underscored participants' vaccine refusal. Results indicate that the vast majority of participants supported vaccination until a particular cue motivated them to consider otherwise, and qualitative analysis identified three main categories into which these cues fell: perceived adverse reactions, endorsements from health care professionals, and perceived contradiction among expert-endorsed messages. These categories point to the central role of health communication in motivating vaccine refusal. Better understanding these cues can inform vaccine communication scholarship and practice, and also lend theoretical insight into the intertextual nature of controversial health messages and decisions.
最近儿童疫苗豁免率的上升引起了公共卫生界的关注。本研究借鉴健康信念模型,对 50 名拒绝接种一种或多种疫苗的母亲(n=50)进行了深入访谈,旨在确定具体原因和更广泛的决策背景,这些原因和背景是参与者拒绝疫苗接种的基础。结果表明,绝大多数参与者支持接种疫苗,直到特定的线索促使他们重新考虑,定性分析确定了这些线索分为三类:感知不良反应、医疗保健专业人员的认可,以及专家认可的信息之间的矛盾。这些类别指出了健康传播在激发疫苗抵制方面的核心作用。更好地理解这些线索可以为疫苗传播研究和实践提供信息,并为有争议的健康信息和决策的互文性质提供理论见解。