• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

FIGO 分期为 IIB 期宫颈癌行根治性子宫切除术与根治性放化疗的倾向性评分分析。

Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Hysterectomy Versus Definitive Chemoradiation for FIGO Stage IIB Cervical Cancer.

机构信息

Departments of Radiation Oncology and.

Gynecologic Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya.

出版信息

Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Oct;28(8):1576-1583. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001336.

DOI:10.1097/IGC.0000000000001336
PMID:30095702
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes and toxicities of radical hysterectomy (RH) and definitive chemoradiation (CRT) for International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIB cervical cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on FIGO stage IIB patients who underwent RH with adjuvant radiotherapy (surgery group) or intended to receive CRT (CRT group). The distributions of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed for the 2 groups based on age, tumor diameter, histological type, and pelvic node metastasis in pretreatment imaging tests.

RESULTS

Median follow-up times were 58 months in the surgery group (n = 75) and 55 months in the CRT group (n = 65). Propensity score matching identified 37 patients with similar characteristics from each group. Significant differences were observed in the ratio of the chemotherapy combination between the surgery and CRT groups before (47% vs 98%) and after PSM (51% vs 100%). Five-year DFS rates were slightly higher in the surgery group than in the CRT group before PSM (69% vs 58%, P = 0.30) but were similar after PSM (76% vs 82%, P = 0.36). Five-year OS rates were similar between the surgery and CRT groups before (70% vs 75%, P = 0.59) and after PSM (78% vs 77%, P = 0.97). The results of multivariate analyses also showed that neither DFS nor OS was associated with the treatment modalities regardless of PSM. The incidence of late toxicities grade 2 or greater was similar between the surgery and CRT groups before (17% vs 23%, P = 0.31) and after PSM (19% vs 24%, P = 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that RH with adjuvant radiotherapy and definitive CRT are equivalent treatment options for patients with FIGO stage IIB cancer. However, prospective larger studies are needed to confirm this.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较国际妇产科联合会(FIGO)分期为 IIB 期宫颈癌行根治性子宫切除术(RH)与根治性放化疗(CRT)的结局和毒性。

材料和方法

对接受 RH 联合辅助放疗(手术组)或计划接受 CRT(CRT 组)的 FIGO IIB 期患者进行回顾性分析。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算无病生存率(DFS)和总生存率(OS)的分布。根据治疗前影像学检查中疾病无进展生存(DFS)和总体生存(OS)的年龄、肿瘤直径、组织学类型和盆腔淋巴结转移情况,对 2 组进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)。

结果

手术组(n=75)中位随访时间为 58 个月,CRT 组(n=65)为 55 个月。PSM 后从每组各匹配 37 例具有相似特征的患者。手术组和 CRT 组化疗联合方案的比例在 PSM 前(47%比 98%)和 PSM 后(51%比 100%)差异有统计学意义。PSM 前手术组 5 年 DFS 率略高于 CRT 组(69%比 58%,P=0.30),但 PSM 后差异无统计学意义(76%比 82%,P=0.36)。PSM 前手术组和 CRT 组 5 年 OS 率相似(70%比 75%,P=0.59),PSM 后差异亦无统计学意义(78%比 77%,P=0.97)。多因素分析结果也显示,无论 PSM 与否,DFS 和 OS 均与治疗方式无关。PSM 前手术组和 CRT 组中晚期毒性≥2 级的发生率相似(17%比 23%,P=0.31),PSM 后差异亦无统计学意义(19%比 24%,P=0.78)。

结论

本研究结果表明,RH 联合辅助放疗和根治性 CRT 是 FIGO IIB 期癌症患者的等效治疗选择。但需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来证实这一点。

相似文献

1
Propensity Score Analysis of Radical Hysterectomy Versus Definitive Chemoradiation for FIGO Stage IIB Cervical Cancer.FIGO 分期为 IIB 期宫颈癌行根治性子宫切除术与根治性放化疗的倾向性评分分析。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 Oct;28(8):1576-1583. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000001336.
2
Outcome of international Federation of gynecology and obstetrics stage IIb cervical cancer from 2003 to 2012: an evaluation of treatments and prognosis: a retrospective study.2003年至2012年国际妇产科联盟IIb期宫颈癌的治疗结果:治疗与预后评估:一项回顾性研究
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Jun;25(5):910-8. doi: 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000430.
3
Definite chemoradiotherapy is a competent treatment option in FIGO stage IB2 cervical cancer compared with radical surgery +/- neoadjuvant chemotherapy.与根治性手术 +/- 新辅助化疗相比,明确的放化疗是 FIGO 分期 IB2 宫颈癌的一种有能力的治疗选择。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2019 Jan;118(1 Pt 1):99-108. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus radical radiotherapy for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.FIGO IIB期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术联合辅助放疗与根治性放疗的比较
BMC Cancer. 2014 Feb 4;14:63. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-63.
5
Treatment outcomes in patients with FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical cancer and a focally disrupted cervical stromal ring on magnetic resonance imaging: A propensity score matching study.国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期为IB-IIA期宫颈癌且磁共振成像显示宫颈基质环局灶性中断患者的治疗结局:一项倾向评分匹配研究
Gynecol Oncol. 2016 Oct;143(1):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.102. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
6
Postoperative adjuvant therapy for stage IA-IIA cervical adenocarcinoma (FIGO 2018) with one intermediate-risk factor: a multicentre retrospective cohort study of 63,926 cases.对具有一个中危因素的IA-IIA期宫颈腺癌(国际妇产科联盟2018年分期)的术后辅助治疗:一项对63926例病例的多中心回顾性队列研究
World J Surg Oncol. 2025 Mar 14;23(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12957-025-03739-9.
7
Radical hysterectomy with adjuvant radiotherapy versus definitive radiotherapy alone for FIGO stage IIB cervical cancer.根治性子宫切除术联合辅助放疗与单纯根治性放疗治疗 FIGO 分期 IIB 宫颈癌的比较。
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Nov;123(2):241-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.07.009. Epub 2011 Aug 6.
8
Comparison of survival outcomes between radio-chemotherapy and radical hysterectomy with postoperative standard therapy in patients with stage IB1 to IIA2 cervical cancer: long-term oncological outcome analysis in 37 Chinese hospitals.比较 IB1 期到 IIA2 期宫颈癌患者接受放化疗与根治性子宫切除术联合术后标准治疗的生存结局:37 家中国医院的长期肿瘤学结局分析。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Mar 6;20(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-6651-8.
9
Impact of different post-operative treatment modalities on long-term outcomes in International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 stage IIICp cervical cancer.不同术后治疗方式对国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)2018 期 IIICp 宫颈癌患者长期结局的影响。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2023 Jun 5;33(6):882-889. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004234.
10
Multimodal treatment including hysterectomy improves survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer: A population-based, propensity score-matched analysis.多模态治疗包括子宫切除术可改善局部晚期宫颈癌患者的生存:一项基于人群的倾向评分匹配分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Dec;48:122-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.10.028. Epub 2017 Oct 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Radical hysterectomy or chemoradiotherapy for clinically early-stage cervical cancer with suspicious lymph nodes on imaging: a retrospective cohort study.影像学检查发现可疑淋巴结的临床早期宫颈癌行根治性子宫切除术或放化疗:一项回顾性队列研究
J Gynecol Oncol. 2025 Mar;36(2):e16. doi: 10.3802/jgo.2025.36.e16.
2
The Polish Society of Gynecological Oncology Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cervical Cancer (v2024.0).波兰妇科肿瘤学会宫颈癌诊断与治疗指南(2024.0版)
J Clin Med. 2024 Jul 25;13(15):4351. doi: 10.3390/jcm13154351.
3
Vaginal Fistulas of the Bladder and Small Bowel After Two-Dimensional Intracavitary Brachytherapy in a Patient With Cervical Cancer.
宫颈癌患者二维腔内近距离放射治疗后膀胱及小肠阴道瘘
Cureus. 2020 Nov 17;12(11):e11537. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11537.
4
Prognosis of bulky pTIIB cervical cancer treated by radical hysterectomy comparing adenocarcinoma with squamous cell carcinoma using propensity score matching.采用倾向评分匹配比较根治性子宫切除术治疗的大块 pTIIB 宫颈癌中腺癌与鳞癌的预后。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Apr;153(1):56-63. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13451. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
5
Management of Stage IIB Cervical Cancer: an Overview of the Current Evidence.IIB期宫颈癌的管理:当前证据概述
Curr Oncol Rep. 2020 Feb 12;22(3):28. doi: 10.1007/s11912-020-0888-x.
6
Knockdown of BRCC3 exerts an anti‑tumor effect on cervical cancer in vitro.敲低 BRCC3 对体外宫颈癌具有抗肿瘤作用。
Mol Med Rep. 2018 Dec;18(6):4886-4894. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9511. Epub 2018 Sep 26.