In-hospital delays to stroke thrombolysis: Out of hours versus regular hours and reduction in treatment times through the creation of a 24/7 mobile thrombolysis team.

BACKGROUND

The main aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the implementation of a mobile thrombolysis team (MTT) on time to thrombolysis treatment depending on patient admission time: regular hours (RH) or out of hours (OH).

METHODS

504 consecutive patients treated with IV tPA or with combined IV tPA and mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke were retrospectively included between 1st January 2013 and 31st December 2017. Three sub-periods were identified: 2013-2014, 2015-2016, and 2017 during which patients were treated with the usual care (UC), by the MTT or with UC according to their time of admission, or by the MTT, in the three time periods respectively. We compared in-hospital delays according to patient admission time.

RESULTS

In 2013-2014, 133 patients were included. Both median door-to-needle (DTN) and imaging to needle (ITN) times were shorter for patients admitted during RH than OH, respectively 75 min versus 85 min and 52 min versus 57 min (P < 0.05), and the proportion of patients with DTN ≤ 60 min was 23% versus 9% (P < 0.05), respectively. In 2015-2016, 223 patients were included. DTN and ITN times were shorter for patients admitted during RH and treated by the MTT than during OH with UC, respectively 54 min versus 78 min and 24 min versus 47 min (P < 0.001), and the proportion of patients with DTN ≤ 60 min was 64% versus 21% (P < 0.001), respectively. In 2017, there was no difference concerning in-hospital delays regardless of patient admission time (P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

DTN time was significantly longer for patients admitted OH. We suggest that the implementation of an around-the-clock MTT would allow a reduction of in-hospital delays and similar times to thrombolysis treatment regardless of admission time.