Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Pharmacotherapy. 2018 Oct;38(10):1038-1050. doi: 10.1002/phar.2169.
Intranasal lidocaine has been studied and recommended as an alternative in the management of acute headache. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal lidocaine in the acute management of primary headaches. The MEDLINE (1946 to May 2018), EMBASE (1974 to May 2018), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (2008 to May 2018), Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (1982 to May 2018), and ClincialTrials.gov online databases were searched. Studies conducted in patients with acute primary headache were included if lidocaine was compared with placebo or alternative treatments, lidocaine dosing was specified, and patients' pain before and after treatment were clearly reported. Six studies met the inclusion criteria. Intranasal lidocaine demonstrated potential benefit over placebo in acute pain reduction and need for rescue medication only in the four studies deemed to be of poor quality, not in the two fair-quality studies. No study reported benefit in preventing headache recurrence or repeat visits to the emergency department. Lidocaine was associated with significantly higher rates of adverse events compared with placebo and may result in lower rates of patient satisfaction. There is insufficient evidence to support the use of intranasal lidocaine in acute management of primary headaches. Further research is warranted to better elucidate whether intranasal lidocaine has a role in the management of specific primary headache subtypes and whether there is an optimal regimen.
鼻内利多卡因已被研究并推荐作为急性头痛管理的替代方法。本系统评价的目的是评估鼻内利多卡因在原发性头痛急性管理中的疗效和安全性。检索了 MEDLINE(1946 年至 2018 年 5 月)、EMBASE(1974 年至 2018 年 5 月)、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库(2008 年至 2018 年 5 月)、护理与联合健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)(1982 年至 2018 年 5 月)和 ClinicalTrials.gov 在线数据库。如果利多卡因与安慰剂或替代治疗相比,利多卡因剂量有明确规定,并且患者治疗前后的疼痛明显报告,则将在急性原发性头痛患者中进行的研究纳入。符合纳入标准的有 6 项研究。只有在被认为质量较差的四项研究中,鼻内利多卡因在急性疼痛减轻和对救援药物的需求方面显示出优于安慰剂的潜在益处,而在两项质量中等的研究中则没有。没有研究报告在预防头痛复发或再次就诊急诊方面有获益。与安慰剂相比,利多卡因与更高的不良事件发生率相关,并且可能导致更低的患者满意度。没有足够的证据支持在急性原发性头痛管理中使用鼻内利多卡因。需要进一步的研究来更好地阐明鼻内利多卡因是否在特定原发性头痛亚型的管理中具有作用,以及是否存在最佳方案。