Department of Health Policy and Management, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Department of Epidemiology and the Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health and the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Am Heart J. 2018 Oct;204:119-127. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.07.008. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
Circulating N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) predicts incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF), but the association of longitudinal changes in NT-proBNP concentrations with incident AF has not been explored.
We studied 9705 individuals without prevalent AF in 1996-1998 and with available NT-proBNP measurements obtained in samples collected during two visits in 1990-1992 (visit 2) and 1996-1998 (visit 4) in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study. Participants were followed through the end of 2013. AF was ascertained from electrocardiograms, hospital discharge codes, and death certificates. Multivariable Cox regression was used to evaluate the association of absolute change in log-transformed NT-proBNP [ln(NT-proBNP)] with incident AF. We also assessed the impact of adding ln(NT-proBNP) change as a predictor of AF by difference in the C-statistic and net reclassification improvement (NRI).
Over a median follow up of 16 years, there were 1503 incident cases of AF. The means (SD) ln(NT-proBNP) at visit 2 and visit 4 were 3.83 (1.01) and 4.35 (0.94), respectively. There was a 0.52 (0.79) increase in ln(NT-proBNP) over the 6-year period. Greater increases in ln(NT-proBNP) were associated with higher risk of AF [hazard ratio, 2.82 (95% confidence interval 2.34, 3.39), comparing top to bottom quintiles, and 1.74 (1.61, 1.87) per 1-unit increase in ln(NT-proBNP)]. Adding ln(NT-proBNP) change to a model with multiple predictors including baseline NT-proBNP had relatively limited impact in the C-statistic (increase from 0.748, 95%CI 0.736-0.761, to 0.762, 95%CI 0.750, 0.774). Adding ln(NT-proBNP) change to initial predictive models resulted in a categorical NRI of 0.062 (95% CI 0.033, 0.092) and a continuous NRI of 0.092 (95%CI, 0.017, 0.182).
Positive NT-proBNP change is associated with an increased incidence rate of AF. Adding NT-proBNP change into the prediction model modestly improved incident AF prediction. Future studies should assess the value of monitoring NT-proBNP concentration among individuals at high risk of developing AF.
循环 N 末端 pro B 型利钠肽(NT-proBNP)可预测心房颤动(AF)的发生率,但纵向 NT-proBNP 浓度变化与 AF 事件的关系尚未得到探讨。
我们研究了 1996-1998 年无 AF 既往史的 9705 例患者,并在 1990-1992 年(第 2 次就诊)和 1996-1998 年(第 4 次就诊)两次就诊期间获得了可用的 NT-proBNP 测量值。参与者通过心电图、住院出院代码和死亡证明进行随访。多变量 Cox 回归用于评估 log 转换 NT-proBNP [ln(NT-proBNP)]绝对变化与 AF 事件的相关性。我们还通过差异 C 统计量和净重新分类改善(NRI)评估了将 ln(NT-proBNP)变化作为 AF 预测指标的影响。
中位随访 16 年后,共发生 1503 例 AF 事件。第 2 次就诊和第 4 次就诊时的 ln(NT-proBNP)平均值(标准差)分别为 3.83(1.01)和 4.35(0.94)。ln(NT-proBNP)在 6 年内增加了 0.52(0.79)。ln(NT-proBNP)的增加与 AF 风险的增加相关[风险比,2.82(95%置信区间 2.34,3.39),比较最高和最低五分位数,ln(NT-proBNP)每增加 1 个单位,风险比为 1.74(1.61,1.87)]。将 ln(NT-proBNP)变化添加到包括基线 NT-proBNP 的多个预测因子模型中,对 C 统计量的影响相对有限(从 0.748(95%CI 0.736-0.761)增加到 0.762(95%CI 0.750-0.774))。将 ln(NT-proBNP)变化添加到初始预测模型中,分类 NRI 为 0.062(95%CI 0.033,0.092),连续 NRI 为 0.092(95%CI,0.017,0.182)。
阳性 NT-proBNP 变化与 AF 发生率的增加相关。将 NT-proBNP 变化添加到预测模型中,可适度提高 AF 事件的预测准确性。未来的研究应该评估在发生 AF 风险较高的人群中监测 NT-proBNP 浓度的价值。