• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

法国电子病历的引入:第二次尝试取得了更多进展。

The introduction of electronic medical records in France: More progress during the second attempt.

机构信息

Montpellier Management Institute, Montpellier University, France.

出版信息

Health Policy. 2018 Sep;122(9):937-940. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Aug 2.

DOI:10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.022
PMID:30100529
Abstract

To support care coordination, a national electronic medical record (DMP), has been created by law in 2004. Because of technical difficulties and delays during implementation, the project was entrusted to a dedicated technical agency in 2009. But 3 years later, only 160,000 DMPs had been opened contrary to the several million expected. Physicians criticized the technical and administrative burden, but the main factors highlighted were resistance to sharing information with patients and with other professionals. Failing to cross the critical threshold of users that gives value to the system, the project failed. After this first attempt, the project was entrusted by law to the national health insurance fund in 2016. The new policy was addressed to patients, professionals and software companies. The policy has allowed patients to independently access and modify their DMP data already in possession of the national public medical insurance, and has introduced financial incentives for physicians opening a DMP. As a result the deployment of DMPs has accelerated substantially: 350,000 new DMPs were opened in nine pilot departments within a year. If scaled-up to the entire country, this number would correspond to 4 million DMPs.

摘要

为了支持医疗协调,2004 年法律规定创建了一个国家电子病历(DMP)。由于在实施过程中遇到技术困难和延误,该项目于 2009 年委托给一个专门的技术机构。但 3 年后,仅开设了 16 万个 DMP,而预期开设几百万个。医生批评了技术和行政负担,但突出的主要因素是抵制与患者和其他专业人员共享信息。由于未能跨越系统有价值的用户关键门槛,该项目失败了。在第一次尝试之后,该项目于 2016 年被法律委托给国家健康保险基金。新政策针对患者、专业人员和软件公司。该政策允许患者独立访问和修改他们已经拥有的国家公共医疗保险的 DMP 数据,并为开设 DMP 的医生引入了经济激励。结果,DMP 的部署大大加快:在一年内在九个试点部门开设了 35 万个新的 DMP。如果扩展到全国,这个数字将相当于 400 万个 DMP。

相似文献

1
The introduction of electronic medical records in France: More progress during the second attempt.法国电子病历的引入:第二次尝试取得了更多进展。
Health Policy. 2018 Sep;122(9):937-940. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2018.07.022. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
2
Use of a Nationwide Personally Controlled Electronic Health Record by Healthcare Professionals and Patients: A Case Study with the French DMP.医疗保健专业人员和患者对全国性个人控制电子健康记录的使用:以法国疾病管理项目为例的研究
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;235:333-337.
3
Update on the DMP, the French Nationally Shared Medical Record: Did We Make It?法国国家共享病历DMP的最新情况:我们成功了吗?
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2020 Jun 16;270:698-702. doi: 10.3233/SHTI200250.
4
Adoption of a Nationwide Shared Medical Record in France: Lessons Learnt after 5 Years of Deployment.法国全国共享病历的采用:部署五年后的经验教训。
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2017 Feb 10;2016:1100-1109. eCollection 2016.
5
The use of regional platforms for managing electronic health records for the production of regional public health indicators in France.法国利用区域平台管理电子健康记录,以生成区域公共卫生指标。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2012 Apr 3;12:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-12-28.
6
The (Re)-Relaunching of the DMP, the French Shared Medical Record: New Features to Improve Uptake and Use.法国共享病历DMP的(重新)推出:促进采用和使用的新功能
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;247:256-260.
7
Patient Access to Personal Health Information: Regulation vs. Reality.患者获取个人健康信息:法规与现实
Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2015 Jan 1;12(Winter):1c. eCollection 2015.
8
A comparison of English and French approaches to providing patients access to Summary Care Records: scope, consent, cost.英国和法国为患者提供摘要护理记录的方法比较:范围、同意和成本
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;186:61-5.
9
National eHealth Implementation: Country Experience.国家电子健康实施:国家经验
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;225:168-72.
10
Critical areas of national electronic health record programs-is our focus correct?国家电子健康记录计划的关键领域——我们的关注点正确吗?
Int J Med Inform. 2010 Mar;79(3):211-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Jan 15.

引用本文的文献

1
How do opt-in versus opt-out settings nudge patients toward electronic health record adoption? An exploratory study of facilitators and barriers in Austria and France.选择加入与选择退出设置如何促使患者采用电子健康记录?奥地利和法国的促进因素和障碍的探索性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Apr 8;24(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10929-w.
2
Discussions With End Users to Inform the Vision for a Shared Care Record in Ontario: Qualitative Interview Study.与终端用户进行讨论以明确安大略省共享护理记录的愿景:定性访谈研究
Online J Public Health Inform. 2024 Feb 27;16:e51231. doi: 10.2196/51231.
3
A holistic view of facilitators and barriers of electronic health records usage from different perspectives: A qualitative content analysis approach.
从不同视角看电子健康记录使用的促进因素和障碍:定性内容分析方法。
Health Inf Manag. 2024 Sep;53(3):227-236. doi: 10.1177/18333583231178611. Epub 2023 Jul 7.
4
Facility and Regional Factors Associated With the New Adoption of Electronic Medical Records in Japan: Nationwide Longitudinal Observational Study.日本电子病历新采用情况的机构及地区相关因素:全国性纵向观察研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2019 Jun 14;7(2):e14026. doi: 10.2196/14026.