de Lusignan Simon, Seroussi Brigitte
Clinical Informatics, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2013;186:61-5.
Online access to records is part of the process of empowering patients. National health services in both France and England have introduced systems to provide online access to summary health data. The English system was called the "Summary Care Record (SCR)," made accessible to patients through "HealthSpace". The French system Dossier Médical Personnel (DMP) is a patient controlled record clinicians enter data into. The objective was to compare the programmes and lessons from the introduction of patient access. We carried out a literature review. The English system has been progressively de-scoped, with HealthSpace due to close in 2013, only 0.01% of the population signing up for "advanced accounts". The French system slowly grows as more documents are added; though only 0.31% of the population have opened a DMP. The English SCR has an opt-out consent model, whereas the French DMP is patient controlled opt-in consent model. The SCR sits within an NHS intranet while the DMP sits on the Internet. Both systems have costs of around 200 million Euro. Providing patients online access to their medical records is potentially empowering. However, the English HealthSpace and SCR have failed to deliver and are due to be withdrawn as methods of providing patients online access. The French system is still in operation but much criticized for its high costs and low uptake. The design of these systems does not appear to have met patients' needs or been readily integrated into physicians workflow.
在线获取病历是赋予患者权力过程的一部分。法国和英国的国家医疗服务体系都引入了提供在线获取健康摘要数据的系统。英国的系统称为“摘要护理记录(SCR)”,患者可通过“健康空间”访问。法国的系统“个人医疗档案(DMP)”是由患者控制的记录,临床医生可输入数据。目的是比较这两个项目以及引入患者访问系统的经验教训。我们进行了文献综述。英国的系统规模逐渐缩小,“健康空间”将于2013年关闭,只有0.01%的人口注册了“高级账户”。法国的系统随着更多文件的添加而缓慢发展;尽管只有0.31%的人口开通了DMP。英国的SCR采用退出同意模式,而法国的DMP是患者控制的加入同意模式。SCR位于英国国家医疗服务体系的内联网中,而DMP位于互联网上。两个系统的成本都约为2亿欧元。为患者提供在线获取病历的机会可能会赋予他们权力。然而,英国的“健康空间”和SCR未能取得成效,将作为为患者提供在线访问的方式而被撤销。法国的系统仍在运行,但因其成本高、使用率低而备受批评。这些系统的设计似乎没有满足患者的需求,也没有很容易地融入医生的工作流程。