• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腭裂患儿鼓膜内陷的自然病程。

Natural History of Tympanic Membrane Retraction in Children with Cleft Palate.

作者信息

Parkes William, Vilchez-Madrigal Luis, Cushing Sharon, Papsin Blake, James Adrian

机构信息

Clinic of Otolaryngology, Nemours/Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, DE, USA.

Clinic of Otolaryngology, National Children's Hospital, San Jose, Costa Rica.

出版信息

J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Aug;14(2):250-254. doi: 10.5152/iao.2018.5609.

DOI:10.5152/iao.2018.5609
PMID:30100539
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6354479/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The natural history of tympanic membrane retraction is unpredictable. To obtain prognostic information for guiding surveillance and treatment, a cohort of children with retraction from cleft palate were prospectively followed for over 5 years.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study at a tertiary academic institution. Children with pars tensa retraction were selected from a cohort of 143 children with cleft palate. Thirty-seven ears were assessed with otoendoscopic image capture and audiometry at a median age of 9 years and reassessed at a median follow-up interval of 6.4 years. The severity of tympanic membrane retraction in the serial images of each ear was compared by four pediatric otolaryngologists blinded to the dates of the images.

RESULTS

Initially, 19/37 retractions (51%) demonstrated contact with the incus and/or promontory. Follow-up images were rated as stable (n=16) or better (n=12) for 28/37 retractions (76%). Of the nine retractions that became more extensive, two developed cholesteatoma (5% of the total). No ossicular erosion developed in ears without cholesteatoma. Conductive hearing loss (4-tone average air-bone gap >25 decibels hearing level) was initially present in five ears, worsened in one, and normalized without intervention in others. No ears with initial normal hearing developed hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

Most tympanic membrane retractions remained stable or improved over time in this cohort of children who were at a risk of persistent eustachian tube dysfunction. Clinically significant progression occurred infrequently, justifying the conservative approach taken to manage these retractions. Such data are necessary to weigh the potential benefit of preventive intervention over observation.

摘要

目的

鼓膜内陷的自然病程不可预测。为了获取用于指导监测和治疗的预后信息,对一组腭裂导致鼓膜内陷的儿童进行了超过5年的前瞻性随访。

材料与方法

这是一项在三级学术机构进行的前瞻性观察研究。从143名腭裂儿童队列中选取紧张部内陷的儿童。在平均年龄9岁时,对37只耳朵进行耳内镜图像采集和听力测定评估,并在平均随访间隔6.4年后重新评估。由四位对图像日期不知情的儿科耳鼻喉科医生比较每只耳朵系列图像中鼓膜内陷的严重程度。

结果

最初有19/37例(51%)内陷表现为与砧骨和/或岬接触。随访图像显示,28/37例(76%)内陷被评为稳定(n = 16)或改善(n = 12)。在9例内陷加重的病例中,2例发展为胆脂瘤(占总数的5%)。无胆脂瘤的耳朵未发生听骨侵蚀。最初有5只耳朵存在传导性听力损失(4个音调平均气骨导间距>25分贝听力级),其中1只加重,其他未干预的耳朵听力恢复正常。最初听力正常的耳朵均未出现听力损失。

结论

在这组存在持续性咽鼓管功能障碍风险的儿童中,大多数鼓膜内陷随时间推移保持稳定或改善。临床上显著的进展很少发生,证明了对这些内陷采取保守治疗方法的合理性。此类数据对于权衡预防性干预相对于观察的潜在益处是必要的。

相似文献

1
Natural History of Tympanic Membrane Retraction in Children with Cleft Palate.腭裂患儿鼓膜内陷的自然病程。
J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Aug;14(2):250-254. doi: 10.5152/iao.2018.5609.
2
Pars tensa retractions without cholesteatoma in children: predictors for ossicular chain destruction, air conduction thresholds, and postoperative retractions.儿童无胆脂瘤的紧张部内陷:听骨链破坏、气导阈值及术后内陷的预测因素
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jul;35(6):997-1002. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000316.
3
The Natural History of Asymptomatic Deep Pars Tensa Retraction.无症状性鼓膜紧张部深层内陷的自然病程。
J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Apr;14(1):10-14. doi: 10.5152/iao.2018.5234.
4
Pars tensa and pars flaccida retractions in persistent otitis media with effusion.分泌性中耳炎中紧张部和松弛部的回缩
Otol Neurotol. 2001 May;22(3):291-8.
5
Eustachian tube dysfunction in children with cleft palate: A tympanometric time-to-event analysis.腭裂儿童的咽鼓管功能障碍:鼓室压时程分析。
Laryngoscope. 2020 Apr;130(4):1044-1050. doi: 10.1002/lary.28103. Epub 2019 Jun 13.
6
Prospective study of tympanic membrane retraction, hearing loss, and multifrequency tympanometry.鼓膜内陷、听力损失及多频鼓室图的前瞻性研究
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1999 Nov;121(5):514-22. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(99)70049-5.
7
Retraction pockets of pars tensa in pediatric patients: clinical evolution and treatment.小儿紧张部鼓膜退缩袋:临床演变与治疗
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010 Feb;74(2):178-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2009.11.004. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
8
Acquired middle ear cholesteatoma in children with cleft palate: experience from 18 surgical cases.腭裂患儿获得性中耳胆脂瘤:18例手术病例的经验
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2014 Jun;78(6):918-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
9
[Otological findings in adults with isolated cleft palate or cleft lip, jaw, and palate].[孤立性腭裂或唇腭裂、颌裂和腭裂成人的耳科检查结果]
Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir. 2004 Nov;8(6):356-60. doi: 10.1007/s10006-004-0574-4. Epub 2004 Oct 21.
10
Long-Term Otologic and Audiometric Outcomes in Patients with Cleft Palate.腭裂患者的长期耳科和听力测量结果
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2017 Oct;157(4):676-682. doi: 10.1177/0194599817707514. Epub 2017 Jun 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics of Hearing Loss in Patients with Gene Variants (Sticker Syndrome Type 1).基因变异患者(1型贴纸综合征)听力损失的特征
Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Aug;77(8):3091-3098. doi: 10.1007/s12070-025-05638-7. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
2
Radiological and audiological predictors of stapes destruction in adherent pars tensa.镫骨固定的放射影像学和听力学预测因素。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Aug;280(8):3615-3624. doi: 10.1007/s00405-023-07873-6. Epub 2023 Feb 12.
3
Management of tympanic membrane retractions: a systematic review.鼓膜内陷的处理:系统评价。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Feb;279(2):723-737. doi: 10.1007/s00405-021-06719-3. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Developmental aspects of the tympanic membrane: Shedding light on function and disease.鼓膜的发育方面:揭示其功能与疾病
Genesis. 2020 Mar;58(3-4):e23348. doi: 10.1002/dvg.23348. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Cholesteatoma risk in 8,593 orofacial cleft cases and 6,989 siblings: A nationwide study.8593例口腔颌面裂病例及6989名同胞的胆脂瘤风险:一项全国性研究。
Laryngoscope. 2015 May;125(5):1225-9. doi: 10.1002/lary.25022. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
2
A longitudinal study of hearing and middle ear status in individuals with UCLP.一项关于单侧完全性唇腭裂患者听力及中耳状况的纵向研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2014 Jul;35(6):989-96. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000000429.
3
Impact of cleft palate type on the incidence of acquired cholesteatoma.腭裂类型对后天性胆脂瘤发病率的影响。
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2013 May;77(5):695-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.01.020. Epub 2013 Feb 10.
4
In reference to Tympanic membrane retraction: an endoscopic evaluation of staging systems.关于鼓膜内陷:分期系统的内镜评估
Laryngoscope. 2012 Oct;122(10):2359; author reply 2360-1. doi: 10.1002/lary.23449. Epub 2012 Jul 9.
5
Tympanic membrane retraction: An endoscopic evaluation of staging systems.鼓膜内陷:分期系统的内镜评估。
Laryngoscope. 2012 May;122(5):1115-20. doi: 10.1002/lary.23203. Epub 2012 Feb 28.
6
The prevalence of tympanic membrane and related middle ear pathology in children: a large longitudinal cohort study followed from birth to age ten.儿童鼓膜及相关中耳病理的患病率:一项从出生到 10 岁的大型纵向队列研究。
Otol Neurotol. 2011 Oct;32(8):1256-61. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822f10cf.
7
The Sadé and Tos staging systems: not adequately reliable methods of staging retraction of the tympanic membrane?萨德(Sadé)分期系统和托斯(Tos)分期系统:鼓膜内陷分期并不可靠?
Clin Otolaryngol. 2009 Oct;34(5):506-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-4486.2009.02015.x.
8
Erosion of the incus in pediatric posterior tympanic membrane retraction pockets without cholesteatoma.小儿无胆脂瘤型后鼓膜内陷袋中砧骨侵蚀
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2008 Sep;72(9):1419-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
9
The Erasmus atelectasis classification: proposal of a new classification for atelectasis of the middle ear in children.伊拉斯谟肺不张分类法:儿童中耳肺不张新分类法的提议
Laryngoscope. 2007 Jul;117(7):1255-9. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31805d0160.
10
Conductive hearing loss and otopathology in cleft palate patients.腭裂患者的传导性听力损失与耳病理学
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006 Jun;134(6):946-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2005.12.020.