• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Single Plasma Sample Methods for Measuring Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Cr-EDTA in Children.儿童使用铬-乙二胺四乙酸通过不同单次血浆样本方法测量肾小球滤过率的准确性比较。
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Aug;52(4):293-302. doi: 10.1007/s13139-018-0529-6. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
2
Comparison of glomerular filtration rate measurements with two plasma and single plasma sample methods in renal transplant cases with stable renal graft functions.肾移植功能稳定的病例中,两种血浆法与单血浆样本法测量肾小球滤过率的比较
Ann Nucl Med. 2015 May;29(4):359-65. doi: 10.1007/s12149-015-0954-x. Epub 2015 Feb 3.
3
The single-plasma-sample method for determining the glomerular filtration rate with Tc-99m-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid in childhood and adolescence: is it age-dependent?用锝-99m-二乙三胺五乙酸测定儿童和青少年肾小球滤过率的单血浆样本法:是否与年龄有关?
Ann Nucl Med. 2002 Dec;16(8):541-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02988631.
4
Iohexol plasma clearance in children: validation of multiple formulas and single-point sampling times.碘海醇血浆清除率在儿童中的应用:多种公式和单点采样时间的验证。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2018 Apr;33(4):683-696. doi: 10.1007/s00467-017-3841-y. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
5
Comparison of glomerular filtration rate measurements with the two plasma sample and single plasma sample, gamma camera Gates, creatinine clearance, and prediction equation methods in potential kidney donors with normal renal function.在肾功能正常的潜在肾脏供体中,比较两种血浆样本法、单血浆样本法、γ相机门控心血池显像法、肌酐清除率法及预测方程法测量肾小球滤过率的情况。
Nucl Med Commun. 2008 Feb;29(2):157-65. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e3282f1bbde.
6
Measurement of glomerular filtration rate in adults: accuracy of five single-sample plasma clearance methods.
Clin Physiol. 1989 Apr;9(2):171-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097x.1989.tb00968.x.
7
Single-sample methods to measure GFR with technetium-99m-DTPA.
J Nucl Med. 1997 Aug;38(8):1290-5.
8
Mannitol clearance for the determination of glomerular filtration rate-a validation against clearance of Cr-EDTA.用于测定肾小球滤过率的甘露醇清除率——与铬标记乙二胺四乙酸清除率的对比验证
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2018 Jan;38(1):10-16. doi: 10.1111/cpf.12374. Epub 2016 Jun 3.
9
Plasma clearance rate of 51Cr-EDTA provides a precise and convenient technique for measurement of glomerular filtration rate in diabetic humans.51铬-乙二胺四乙酸的血浆清除率为测量糖尿病患者的肾小球滤过率提供了一种精确且便捷的技术。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 1996 Jan;7(1):118-27. doi: 10.1681/ASN.V71118.
10
Age-specific normal reference ranges for Tc-DTPA glomerular filtration rate to use with two-sample slope-intercept method and Jodal Brochner-Mortensen correction.年龄特异性 Tc-DTPA 肾小球滤过率的正常参考范围,用于双样本斜率截距法和 Jodal Brochner-Mortensen 校正。
Phys Eng Sci Med. 2021 Dec;44(4):1331-1340. doi: 10.1007/s13246-021-01066-3. Epub 2021 Oct 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of plasma clearance of [Cr]CrEDTA based on three, two and single samples to measure the glomerular filtration rate in patients with solid tumors: a prospective cross-sectional analysis.比较三种、两种和一种样本测量实体瘤患者肾小球滤过率时的[Cr]CrEDTA 血浆清除率:一项前瞻性的横断面分析。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2024 Jun 29;79:100427. doi: 10.1016/j.clinsp.2024.100427. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Understanding Bland Altman analysis.理解布兰德-奥特曼分析。
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2015 Jun 5;25(2):141-51. doi: 10.11613/BM.2015.015. eCollection 2015.
2
Correction of the slope-intercept method for the measurement of glomerular filtration rate.肾小球滤过率测量中斜率截距法的校正
Nucl Med Commun. 2014 Dec;35(12):1277-83. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000192.
3
One-sample determination of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in children. An evaluation based on 75 consecutive patients.儿童肾小球滤过率(GFR)的单样本测定。基于 75 例连续患者的评估。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2013 Sep;73(6):466-75. doi: 10.3109/00365513.2013.803233. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
4
Assessment of glomerular filtration rate measurement with plasma sampling: a technical review.采用血浆采样评估肾小球滤过率测量:技术综述
J Nucl Med Technol. 2013 Jun;41(2):67-75. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.113.121004. Epub 2013 May 8.
5
Monitoring renal function during chemotherapy.监测化疗期间的肾功能。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2012 Sep;39(9):1478-82. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2158-0. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
6
Accurate mass measurement: terminology and treatment of data.精确质量测量:术语和数据处理。
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 2010 Nov;21(11):1821-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2010.06.006. Epub 2010 Jun 19.
7
New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD.估算慢性肾脏病儿童肾小球滤过率的新方程。
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009 Mar;20(3):629-37. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008030287. Epub 2009 Jan 21.
8
Reassessment of a classical single injection 51Cr-EDTA clearance method for determination of renal function in children and adults. Part I: Analytically correct relationship between total and one-pool clearance.重新评估用于测定儿童和成人肾功能的经典单次注射51Cr-乙二胺四乙酸清除率方法。第一部分:总清除率与单池清除率之间的分析正确关系。
Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2009;69(3):305-13. doi: 10.1080/00365510802566882.
9
An improved equation for correcting slope-intercept measurements of glomerular filtration rate for the single exponential approximation.一种用于通过单指数近似校正肾小球滤过率斜率截距测量值的改进方程。
Nucl Med Commun. 2007 Apr;28(4):315-20. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0b013e328014a14a.
10
Diagnostic accuracy of cystatin C compared to serum creatinine for the estimation of renal dysfunction in adults and children--a meta-analysis.与血清肌酐相比,胱抑素C在评估成人和儿童肾功能不全中的诊断准确性——一项荟萃分析。
Clin Biochem. 2007 Mar;40(5-6):383-91. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2006.10.026. Epub 2007 Jan 5.

儿童使用铬-乙二胺四乙酸通过不同单次血浆样本方法测量肾小球滤过率的准确性比较。

A Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Single Plasma Sample Methods for Measuring Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Cr-EDTA in Children.

作者信息

Ha Sejin, Lee Jong Jin

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505 South Korea.

出版信息

Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Aug;52(4):293-302. doi: 10.1007/s13139-018-0529-6. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

DOI:10.1007/s13139-018-0529-6
PMID:30100942
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6066493/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Among the different methods of measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance, the two-plasma-sample method (TPSM) is widely used, and highly accurate. The single-plasma-sample method (SPSM) is occasionally used for simplicity, at the expense of accuracy. Our aims were (1) to investigate the correlation and (2) to compare the accuracy of six known SPSMs in pediatric patients in reference to TPSM.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 122 pediatric cases (65 boys, age 7.3 ± 4.6 years) and analyzed 307 GFR measurements. SPSMs included Groth and Aasted at 120 min, Ham at 120 min, Christensen and Groth at 120 and 240 min, and Jacobsson at 120 and 240 min. Reference GFR (GFR) was defined using TPSM GFR corrected by the Jodal and Brochner-Mortensen equation. GFR < 30 mL min 1.73 m were excluded. The standard error of the estimate (SEE) and the number of cases with differences > 10% () were used to evaluate accuracy.

RESULTS

SPSMs generally correlated well with GFR ( = 0.920.99) and were relatively accurate (SEE = 9.2115.60). Groth and Aasted showed the smallest SEE, while Jacobsson at 240 min showed the smallest for all GFR ranges. As for the decreased GFR, Ham was most accurate followed by Jacobsson at 240 min.

CONCLUSIONS

Jacobsson at 240 min provided good accuracy in all GFR ranges and was well correlated with TPSM. Jacobsson at 240 min might be the most appropriate method to substitute for TPSM in pediatric patients. Ham could be an alternative in patients with impaired renal function.

摘要

目的

在使用铬标记乙二胺四乙酸清除率测量肾小球滤过率(GFR)的不同方法中,双血浆样本法(TPSM)应用广泛且高度准确。单血浆样本法(SPSM)有时因操作简便而被使用,但以准确性为代价。我们的目的是:(1)研究相关性;(2)参照TPSM比较六种已知SPSM在儿科患者中的准确性。

方法

我们回顾性分析了122例儿科病例(65名男孩,年龄7.3±4.6岁),并分析了307次GFR测量值。SPSM包括120分钟时的格罗斯法和奥斯特法、120分钟时的哈姆法、120分钟和240分钟时的克里斯蒂安森法和格罗斯法,以及120分钟和240分钟时的雅各布松法。参考GFR(GFR)使用经约达尔和布罗克纳 - 莫滕森方程校正的TPSM GFR来定义。GFR<30 mL·min⁻¹·1.73 m²的情况被排除。估计标准误差(SEE)和差异>10%的病例数( )用于评估准确性。

结果

SPSM一般与GFR相关性良好( =0.920.99)且相对准确(SEE=9.2115.60)。格罗斯法和奥斯特法的SEE最小,而240分钟时的雅各布松法在所有GFR范围内的 最小。对于降低的GFR,哈姆法最准确,其次是240分钟时的雅各布松法。

结论

240分钟时的雅各布松法在所有GFR范围内都具有良好的准确性,并且与TPSM相关性良好。240分钟时的雅各布松法可能是儿科患者中替代TPSM的最合适方法。哈姆法可作为肾功能受损患者的替代方法。