Ha Sejin, Lee Jong Jin
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505 South Korea.
Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018 Aug;52(4):293-302. doi: 10.1007/s13139-018-0529-6. Epub 2018 Jun 28.
Among the different methods of measuring glomerular filtration rate (GFR) using Cr-ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid clearance, the two-plasma-sample method (TPSM) is widely used, and highly accurate. The single-plasma-sample method (SPSM) is occasionally used for simplicity, at the expense of accuracy. Our aims were (1) to investigate the correlation and (2) to compare the accuracy of six known SPSMs in pediatric patients in reference to TPSM.
We retrospectively reviewed 122 pediatric cases (65 boys, age 7.3 ± 4.6 years) and analyzed 307 GFR measurements. SPSMs included Groth and Aasted at 120 min, Ham at 120 min, Christensen and Groth at 120 and 240 min, and Jacobsson at 120 and 240 min. Reference GFR (GFR) was defined using TPSM GFR corrected by the Jodal and Brochner-Mortensen equation. GFR < 30 mL min 1.73 m were excluded. The standard error of the estimate (SEE) and the number of cases with differences > 10% () were used to evaluate accuracy.
SPSMs generally correlated well with GFR ( = 0.920.99) and were relatively accurate (SEE = 9.2115.60). Groth and Aasted showed the smallest SEE, while Jacobsson at 240 min showed the smallest for all GFR ranges. As for the decreased GFR, Ham was most accurate followed by Jacobsson at 240 min.
Jacobsson at 240 min provided good accuracy in all GFR ranges and was well correlated with TPSM. Jacobsson at 240 min might be the most appropriate method to substitute for TPSM in pediatric patients. Ham could be an alternative in patients with impaired renal function.
在使用铬标记乙二胺四乙酸清除率测量肾小球滤过率(GFR)的不同方法中,双血浆样本法(TPSM)应用广泛且高度准确。单血浆样本法(SPSM)有时因操作简便而被使用,但以准确性为代价。我们的目的是:(1)研究相关性;(2)参照TPSM比较六种已知SPSM在儿科患者中的准确性。
我们回顾性分析了122例儿科病例(65名男孩,年龄7.3±4.6岁),并分析了307次GFR测量值。SPSM包括120分钟时的格罗斯法和奥斯特法、120分钟时的哈姆法、120分钟和240分钟时的克里斯蒂安森法和格罗斯法,以及120分钟和240分钟时的雅各布松法。参考GFR(GFR)使用经约达尔和布罗克纳 - 莫滕森方程校正的TPSM GFR来定义。GFR<30 mL·min⁻¹·1.73 m²的情况被排除。估计标准误差(SEE)和差异>10%的病例数( )用于评估准确性。
SPSM一般与GFR相关性良好( =0.920.99)且相对准确(SEE=9.2115.60)。格罗斯法和奥斯特法的SEE最小,而240分钟时的雅各布松法在所有GFR范围内的 最小。对于降低的GFR,哈姆法最准确,其次是240分钟时的雅各布松法。
240分钟时的雅各布松法在所有GFR范围内都具有良好的准确性,并且与TPSM相关性良好。240分钟时的雅各布松法可能是儿科患者中替代TPSM的最合适方法。哈姆法可作为肾功能受损患者的替代方法。