• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

导管诱发的右冠状动脉近端痉挛

Catheter-induced Spasm in the Proximal Right Coronary Artery.

作者信息

Sueda Shozo, Fujimoto Kaori, Sasaki Yasuhiro, Sakaue Tomoki, Habara Hirokazu, Kohno Hiroaki

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Ehime Prefectural Niihama Hospital, Japan.

Department of Cardiology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Japan.

出版信息

Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;58(1):21-30. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1483-18. Epub 2018 Aug 10.

DOI:10.2169/internalmedicine.1483-18
PMID:30101945
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6367073/
Abstract

Objectives The clinical characteristics in patients with catheter-induced spasm in the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) are controversial. We performed a clinical analysis of catheter-induced spasm in the RCA. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 5,296 consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic or follow-up angiography during a 26-year period. During this period, we found 40 patients with catheter-induced spasm in the RCA. We compared the clinical characteristics and procedures of cardiac catheterization in patients with catheter-induced spasm in the RCA with those in patients without such spasm. Results The frequency of catheter-induced spasm in the RCA was 0.75% (40/5,296). We performed pharmacological spasm provocation tests in 36 of 40 patients after spasm relief. Positive spasm was observed in 32 patients (88.9%), and 25 patients (78.1%) had multiple spasms. The catheter procedures, including the approach sites (radial/brachial/femoral), catheter size (4/5/6Fr) and catheter type (Judkins right/Sones/Shared/Judkins left 3.5/Amplatz) were not markedly different between the two groups. A multivariate analysis showed that positive spasm [odds ratio (OR): 7.030, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.920-25.700], a younger age (OR: 0.937, 95% CI: 0.910-0.965) and diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.278, 95% CI: 0.083-0.928) were the determinant factors for the catheter-induced spasm. Conclusion Approximately 80% of patients with catheter-induced spasm in the proximal RCA had coronary spastic angina. Positive provoked spasm was the most powerful determinant factor for catheter-induced spasm.

摘要

目的 右冠状动脉(RCA)近端导管诱发痉挛患者的临床特征存在争议。我们对RCA导管诱发痉挛进行了临床分析。方法 我们回顾性分析了在26年期间连续接受诊断性或随访血管造影的5296例患者。在此期间,我们发现40例RCA导管诱发痉挛患者。我们比较了RCA导管诱发痉挛患者与无此类痉挛患者的临床特征和心脏导管插入术操作。结果 RCA导管诱发痉挛的发生率为0.75%(40/5296)。40例患者中有36例在痉挛缓解后进行了药物性痉挛激发试验。32例患者(88.9%)出现阳性痉挛,25例患者(78.1%)出现多次痉挛。两组之间的导管操作,包括入路部位(桡动脉/肱动脉/股动脉)、导管尺寸(4/5/6Fr)和导管类型(Judkins右/ Sones/共用/Judkins左3.5/Amplatz)无明显差异。多变量分析显示,阳性痉挛[比值比(OR):7.030,95%置信区间(CI):1.920 - 25.700]、较年轻的年龄(OR:0.937,95% CI:0.910 - 0.965)和糖尿病(OR:0.278,95% CI:0.083 - 0.928)是导管诱发痉挛的决定因素。结论 近端RCA导管诱发痉挛的患者中约80%患有冠状动脉痉挛性心绞痛。激发试验阳性痉挛是导管诱发痉挛最有力的决定因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373a/6367073/90ca4b88a8e6/1349-7235-58-0021-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373a/6367073/8105c8772809/1349-7235-58-0021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373a/6367073/a52c886823fc/1349-7235-58-0021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373a/6367073/54187b7c99be/1349-7235-58-0021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373a/6367073/90ca4b88a8e6/1349-7235-58-0021-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373a/6367073/8105c8772809/1349-7235-58-0021-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373a/6367073/a52c886823fc/1349-7235-58-0021-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373a/6367073/54187b7c99be/1349-7235-58-0021-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/373a/6367073/90ca4b88a8e6/1349-7235-58-0021-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Catheter-induced Spasm in the Proximal Right Coronary Artery.导管诱发的右冠状动脉近端痉挛
Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;58(1):21-30. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1483-18. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
2
Clinical characteristics in patients with rest angina and hypoplastic right coronary artery.静息性心绞痛合并右冠状动脉发育不全患者的临床特征
Heart Vessels. 2020 Apr;35(4):443-450. doi: 10.1007/s00380-019-01507-w. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
3
Catheter-induced coronary artery spasm: an angiographic manifestation of vasospastic angina?
Am Heart J. 1983 Oct;106(4 Pt 1):659-65. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(83)90083-2.
4
Randomised comparison of JUDkins vs. tiGEr catheter in coronary angiography via the right radial artery: the JUDGE study.经右桡动脉行冠状动脉造影时,JUDkins 与 tiGEr 导管的随机比较:JUDGE 研究。
EuroIntervention. 2018 Mar 20;13(16):1950-1958. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00699.
5
Catheter-induced coronary spasm--a view of mechanical factors and experience with selective left coronary arteriography.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2000 Feb;63(2):107-12.
6
Impact of pharmacological spasm provocation test in patients with a history of syncope.药物性痉挛激发试验对有晕厥病史患者的影响。
Heart Vessels. 2018 Feb;33(2):126-133. doi: 10.1007/s00380-017-1046-8. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
7
Catheter-induced spasm during spontaneous attack of variant angina.变异型心绞痛自发发作期间的导管诱发痉挛。
Clin Cardiol. 1985 May;8(5):314-7. doi: 10.1002/clc.4960080512.
8
Complete definite positive spasm on acetylcholine spasm provocation tests: comparison of clinical positive spasm.乙酰胆碱痉挛激发试验中完全明确的阳性痉挛:临床阳性痉挛的比较
Heart Vessels. 2016 Feb;31(2):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s00380-014-0595-3. Epub 2014 Nov 4.
9
A prospective randomized trial of Novoste right versus Judkins catheters for engagement of the right coronary artery during diagnostic catheterization.一项关于在诊断性心导管插入术中使用诺沃斯特导管与朱德金斯导管进行右冠状动脉插管的前瞻性随机试验。
J Interv Cardiol. 1993 Sep;6(3):213-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8183.1993.tb00858.x.
10
Coronary artery catheter-induced spasm.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1982;8(6):607-10. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810080609.

引用本文的文献

1
Optical coherence tomography catheter-induced vasospasm of the left anterior descending artery: A case report.光学相干断层扫描导管诱发的左前降支动脉血管痉挛:一例报告。
Radiol Case Rep. 2024 Aug 7;19(10):4618-4621. doi: 10.1016/j.radcr.2024.07.035. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Which Coronary Artery Should Be Preferred for Starting the Coronary Spasm Provocation Test?冠状动脉痉挛激发试验应首选哪支冠状动脉开始?
Life (Basel). 2023 Oct 17;13(10):2072. doi: 10.3390/life13102072.
3
Recurrent Angina in a Patient With Myocardial Infarction With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries.

本文引用的文献

1
Overview of the pharmacological spasm provocation test: Comparisons between acetylcholine and ergonovine.药理学痉挛激发试验概述:乙酰胆碱与麦角新碱的比较
J Cardiol. 2017 Jan;69(1):57-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
2
Overview of complications during pharmacological spasm provocation tests.药物性痉挛激发试验期间并发症概述。
J Cardiol. 2016 Jul;68(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2016.03.005. Epub 2016 May 24.
3
Overview of the Acetylcholine Spasm Provocation Test.乙酰胆碱激发试验概述。
非阻塞性冠状动脉心肌梗死患者的复发性心绞痛
Cureus. 2023 Apr 19;15(4):e37842. doi: 10.7759/cureus.37842. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Catheter-induced Multiple Non-proximal Coronary Spasm in a Patient Presenting with Myocardial Infarction.一名心肌梗死患者出现导管诱导的多处非近端冠状动脉痉挛
Cureus. 2020 Mar 29;12(3):e7456. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7456.
5
Refractory Right Coronary Artery Spasm: A Case Report.难治性右冠状动脉痉挛:一例报告
Cureus. 2020 Feb 18;12(2):e7034. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7034.
Clin Cardiol. 2015 Jul;38(7):430-8. doi: 10.1002/clc.22403. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
4
Catheter-induced vasospasm of both the right external iliac and right coronary arteries during coronary angiography.
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2005 Oct;21(5):481-5. doi: 10.1007/s10554-005-2101-6.
5
Clinical impact of selective spasm provocation tests: comparisons between acetylcholine and ergonovine in 1508 examinations.选择性痉挛激发试验的临床影响:1508例检查中乙酰胆碱与麦角新碱的比较
Coron Artery Dis. 2004 Dec;15(8):491-7. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200412000-00006.
6
Frequency of provoked coronary spasms in patients undergoing coronary arteriography using a spasm provocation test via intracoronary administration of ergonovine.使用麦角新碱冠状动脉内给药的痉挛激发试验进行冠状动脉造影的患者中诱发性冠状动脉痉挛的发生率。
Angiology. 2004 Jul-Aug;55(4):403-11. doi: 10.1177/000331970405500407.
7
Clinical characteristics and possible mechanism of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation induced by intracoronary injection of acetylcholine.
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Sep 1;88(5):570-3. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01744-1.
8
Major complications during spasm provocation tests with an intracoronary injection of acetylcholine.
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Feb 1;85(3):391-4, A10. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00754-7.
9
Catheter-induced spasm of the left main coronary artery.导管诱发的左冠状动脉主干痉挛。
J Invasive Cardiol. 2000 Mar;12(3):158-61.
10
ACC/AHA guidelines for coronary angiography. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Coronary Angiography). Developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会冠状动脉造影指南。美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组(冠状动脉造影委员会)报告。与心血管造影和介入学会合作制定。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 May;33(6):1756-824. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00126-6.