Sueda Shozo, Fujimoto Kaori, Sasaki Yasuhiro, Sakaue Tomoki, Habara Hirokazu, Kohno Hiroaki
Department of Cardiology, Ehime Prefectural Niihama Hospital, Japan.
Department of Cardiology, Tsukazaki Hospital, Japan.
Intern Med. 2019 Jan 1;58(1):21-30. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.1483-18. Epub 2018 Aug 10.
Objectives The clinical characteristics in patients with catheter-induced spasm in the proximal right coronary artery (RCA) are controversial. We performed a clinical analysis of catheter-induced spasm in the RCA. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 5,296 consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic or follow-up angiography during a 26-year period. During this period, we found 40 patients with catheter-induced spasm in the RCA. We compared the clinical characteristics and procedures of cardiac catheterization in patients with catheter-induced spasm in the RCA with those in patients without such spasm. Results The frequency of catheter-induced spasm in the RCA was 0.75% (40/5,296). We performed pharmacological spasm provocation tests in 36 of 40 patients after spasm relief. Positive spasm was observed in 32 patients (88.9%), and 25 patients (78.1%) had multiple spasms. The catheter procedures, including the approach sites (radial/brachial/femoral), catheter size (4/5/6Fr) and catheter type (Judkins right/Sones/Shared/Judkins left 3.5/Amplatz) were not markedly different between the two groups. A multivariate analysis showed that positive spasm [odds ratio (OR): 7.030, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.920-25.700], a younger age (OR: 0.937, 95% CI: 0.910-0.965) and diabetes mellitus (OR: 0.278, 95% CI: 0.083-0.928) were the determinant factors for the catheter-induced spasm. Conclusion Approximately 80% of patients with catheter-induced spasm in the proximal RCA had coronary spastic angina. Positive provoked spasm was the most powerful determinant factor for catheter-induced spasm.
目的 右冠状动脉(RCA)近端导管诱发痉挛患者的临床特征存在争议。我们对RCA导管诱发痉挛进行了临床分析。方法 我们回顾性分析了在26年期间连续接受诊断性或随访血管造影的5296例患者。在此期间,我们发现40例RCA导管诱发痉挛患者。我们比较了RCA导管诱发痉挛患者与无此类痉挛患者的临床特征和心脏导管插入术操作。结果 RCA导管诱发痉挛的发生率为0.75%(40/5296)。40例患者中有36例在痉挛缓解后进行了药物性痉挛激发试验。32例患者(88.9%)出现阳性痉挛,25例患者(78.1%)出现多次痉挛。两组之间的导管操作,包括入路部位(桡动脉/肱动脉/股动脉)、导管尺寸(4/5/6Fr)和导管类型(Judkins右/ Sones/共用/Judkins左3.5/Amplatz)无明显差异。多变量分析显示,阳性痉挛[比值比(OR):7.030,95%置信区间(CI):1.920 - 25.700]、较年轻的年龄(OR:0.937,95% CI:0.910 - 0.965)和糖尿病(OR:0.278,95% CI:0.083 - 0.928)是导管诱发痉挛的决定因素。结论 近端RCA导管诱发痉挛的患者中约80%患有冠状动脉痉挛性心绞痛。激发试验阳性痉挛是导管诱发痉挛最有力的决定因素。