Suppr超能文献

中风患者自我报告与观察到的运动能力评分比较:一项横断面研究。

Comparison between self-reported and observed locomotion ability scores in patients with stroke: a cross-sectional study.

作者信息

Sogbossi Emmanuel S, Kakpossa Charlène, Niama-Natta Didier D, Kpadonou Toussaint G, Batcho Charles S

机构信息

School of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi.

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, National Hospital and University Centre Hubert Koutoukou MAGA, Cotonou, Benin.

出版信息

Int J Rehabil Res. 2018 Dec;41(4):358-363. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0000000000000311.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate (i) the validity of self-reported scores of locomotion ability in stroke survivors using the ABILOCO-Benin questionnaire, and (ii) the congruence between online Rasch analysis of the ABILOCO-Benin raw scores and a conversion table set along with the questionnaire development. Thirty-five adult poststroke patients [mean age: 52 (SD: 10) years, 60% men] recruited from the rehabilitation department of National University Hospital of Cotonou (Benin), self-reported their locomotion ability, filling out the ABILOCO-Benin questionnaire [self-reported scores (SRS)]. Afterwards, a physical therapist observed and rated the patients' locomotion ability, while they performed each of the 15 items of the questionnaire [performance-based scores (PBS)]. Both raw SRS and PBS were then converted to linear measures using (i) an online Rasch analysis method and (ii) an ordinal-to-interval transformation table. Analyses showed high correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.74, P<0.001) and nonsignificant difference (P=0.778) between SRS and PBS. Linear measures from online Rasch and a conversion table also exhibited high correlation (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.92; P<0.001). However, the difference between online analysis and the conversion table was significant (P=0.022). In conclusion, self-report is a valid method to administer ABILOCO-Benin in stroke patients. The conversion table offers a valid opportunity for quick transfer of raw scores to linear measures. However, the accuracy of linear measures from the conversion table may be slightly affected by missing responses.

摘要

本研究旨在调查

(i)使用贝宁版ABILOCO问卷对中风幸存者自我报告的运动能力得分的有效性;以及(ii)对ABILOCO - 贝宁原始得分进行在线拉施分析与问卷开发时设置的转换表之间的一致性。从科托努国立大学医院(贝宁)康复科招募了35名成年中风后患者[平均年龄:52(标准差:10)岁,60%为男性],他们自我报告了自己的运动能力,填写了贝宁版ABILOCO问卷[自我报告得分(SRS)]。之后,一名物理治疗师在患者完成问卷的15项内容时观察并对其运动能力进行评分[基于表现的得分(PBS)]。然后,使用(i)在线拉施分析方法和(ii)一个顺序到区间的转换表,将原始SRS和PBS都转换为线性测量值。分析显示SRS和PBS之间具有高度相关性(组内相关系数 = 0.74,P < 0.001)且差异不显著(P = 0.778)。在线拉施分析得到的线性测量值与转换表也显示出高度相关性(组内相关系数 = 0.92;P < 0.001)。然而,在线分析与转换表之间的差异是显著的(P = 0.022)。总之,自我报告是对中风患者进行贝宁版ABILOCO问卷施测的一种有效方法。转换表为将原始得分快速转换为线性测量值提供了一个有效的途径。然而,转换表得出的线性测量值的准确性可能会受到缺失回答的轻微影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验