Chronic Disease Research Group, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
OptumLabs Visiting Fellow, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.
Thromb Haemost. 2018 Sep;118(9):1637-1645. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668521. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
Oral anticoagulants used for the primary treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) include warfarin and the more recently introduced direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), including rivaroxaban, apixaban, dabigatran and edoxaban. Information on the comparative safety of these medications in routine clinical practice is lacking. We identified patients with diagnoses for VTE and prescriptions for oral anticoagulants using claims data from a large U.S. insurance database from 2012 to 2017. Marginal structural logistic models were used to examine associations between type of oral anticoagulant and risk of all-cause mortality. Of 62,431 enrolees in this analysis, 51% were female and the mean age was 61.9 years. Initial oral anticoagulant prescriptions were for warfarin ( = 35,704), rivaroxaban ( = 21,064) and apixaban ( = 5,663). A total of 1,791 deaths occurred within 6 months of the initial oral anticoagulant prescription. Risk of all-cause mortality was not associated with having a prescription for warfarin versus any DOAC or between any head-to-head DOAC comparisons. Also, associations generally did not vary when stratified by VTE type, sex, age, co-morbidities (including renal disease) or anti-platelet medication use. In this observational study, the associations with all-cause mortality comparing DOACs versus warfarin agree with results from previous clinical trials and observational studies, while the associations for head-to-head DOAC comparisons provide new information on the comparative safety of DOACs. Our findings suggest that other criteria such as patient preference, cost, recurrent VTE risk or bleeding risk should be used when determining the choice of anticoagulant for the primary treatment of VTE.
用于静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)初始治疗的口服抗凝药物包括华法林和最近引入的直接口服抗凝药物(DOAC),包括利伐沙班、阿哌沙班、达比加群和依度沙班。在常规临床实践中,这些药物比较安全性的相关信息尚缺乏。我们使用来自美国一个大型保险数据库的索赔数据,确定了 VTE 诊断和口服抗凝药物处方患者。使用边缘结构逻辑模型来检查口服抗凝药物类型与全因死亡率之间的关联。在这项分析中,62431 名入组者中有 51%为女性,平均年龄为 61.9 岁。初始口服抗凝药物处方为华法林( = 35704)、利伐沙班( = 21064)和阿哌沙班( = 5663)。共有 1791 例死亡发生在初始口服抗凝药物处方后 6 个月内。与华法林相比,使用任何 DOAC 的全因死亡率风险或任何头对头 DOAC 比较均无风险相关。此外,当按 VTE 类型、性别、年龄、合并症(包括肾脏疾病)或抗血小板药物使用分层时,关联通常没有差异。在这项观察性研究中,与华法林相比,比较 DOAC 与全因死亡率的关联与之前的临床试验和观察性研究结果一致,而头对头 DOAC 比较的关联则提供了 DOAC 比较安全性的新信息。我们的研究结果表明,在确定 VTE 初始治疗中抗凝药物的选择时,应考虑其他标准,如患者偏好、成本、复发性 VTE 风险或出血风险。