Somri Mostafa, Gaitini Luis, Matter Ibrahim, Hawash Naser, Falcucci Octavio, Fornari Gustavo Garcia, Mora Pedro Charco, Forat Swaid, Vaida Sonia
Department of Anesthesiology, Bnai-Zion Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.
International Program of Teaching and Investigation in Airway Management - FIDIVA, Haifa, Israel.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr-Jun;34(2):182-187. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_24_17.
The Supreme laryngeal mask airway (SLMA) and the laryngeal tube suction-disposable (LTS-D), both second-generation supraglottic airway devices, have a record of efficiency when used for airway management in mechanically ventilated patients, during general anesthesia. There is no published data comparing these two devices in patients breathing spontaneously during general anesthesia.
Eighty patients with normal airways undergoing elective general anesthesia with spontaneous ventilation were randomized to airway management with a SLMA or LTS-D. Efficacy and adequacy of oxygenation and ventilation were compared.
No cases of desaturation of oxygen saturation (SpO) values of less than 95% occurred with either device. The mean difference for SpO between the two devices (0.7%) has no clinical significance. Slight hypercapnia was noted with both devices to acceptable values during spontaneous ventilation.
Both SLMA and LTS-D are suitable and effective for airway management in patients breathing spontaneously during general anesthesia for minor surgery of short duration.
第二代声门上气道装置——高级喉罩气道(SLMA)和一次性喉管吸引装置(LTS-D),在全身麻醉期间用于机械通气患者的气道管理时均有高效记录。目前尚无关于这两种装置在全身麻醉期间自主呼吸患者中进行比较的已发表数据。
80例气道正常、接受择期全身麻醉且自主通气的患者被随机分为使用SLMA或LTS-D进行气道管理。比较了氧合和通气的有效性及充分性。
两种装置均未出现氧饱和度(SpO)值低于95%的低氧血症情况。两种装置之间SpO的平均差异(0.7%)无临床意义。在自主通气期间,两种装置均出现轻度高碳酸血症,但均在可接受范围内。
对于短时间小手术的全身麻醉期间自主呼吸的患者,SLMA和LTS-D均适用于气道管理且有效。