Routray Sidharth S, Pani Nibedita, Mishra Debasis, Nayak Sunita
Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care, SCB Medical College Hospital, Cuttack, Odisha, India.
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2018 Apr-Jun;34(2):232-236. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_12_17.
Analgesic effect of gabapentin and pregabalin is well-defined in the treatment of neuropathic pain. Postoperative pain after lumbar spine surgery limits the function of patients in the postoperative period, for which the search for ideal analgesic goes on. The aim of the present study was to compare pregabalin and gabapentin as a pre-emptive analgesic in elective lumbar spine surgeries.
In this randomized prospective study, 75 patients were allocated into three groups of 25 each. Group G, group PG, and group received two capsules of gabapentin 300 mg each, two capsules of pregabalin 150 mg each, and two multivitamin capsules, respectively, with sip of water 1 hour before the expected time of induction of anesthesia. Time for requirement of first dose of rescue analgesia, reduction in postoperative pain score and total dose of rescue analgesic used in first 24 hours postoperatively, and side effects were compared.
Time for requirement of first dose of rescue analgesic in PG group was 180.12 min and in G group was 104.16 min, which was statistically significant. Both G and PG group had lower visual analogue scale (VAS) score in comparison to group, which was statistically significant. Consumption of rescue analgesic was less in G and PG group in comparison to group. Amount of rescue analgesic requirement were low in PG group in comparison to G group ( < 0.001).
Though both study drugs had produced prolonged postoperative analgesia compared to placebo, pregabalin had better analgesic profile in postoperative period than gabapentin.
加巴喷丁和普瑞巴林在治疗神经性疼痛方面的镇痛效果已得到明确。腰椎手术后的疼痛限制了患者术后的功能,因此对理想镇痛药物的探索仍在继续。本研究的目的是比较普瑞巴林和加巴喷丁在择期腰椎手术中作为超前镇痛药物的效果。
在这项随机前瞻性研究中,75例患者被分为三组,每组25例。G组、PG组和对照组分别在预计麻醉诱导时间前1小时服用两粒300毫克的加巴喷丁胶囊、两粒150毫克的普瑞巴林胶囊和两粒复合维生素胶囊,并饮水一口。比较首次需要使用急救镇痛药物的时间、术后疼痛评分的降低情况、术后24小时内使用的急救镇痛药物的总剂量以及副作用。
PG组首次需要使用急救镇痛药物的时间为180.12分钟,G组为104.16分钟,差异具有统计学意义。与对照组相比,G组和PG组的视觉模拟评分(VAS)均较低,差异具有统计学意义。与对照组相比,G组和PG组的急救镇痛药物消耗量较少。与G组相比,PG组的急救镇痛药物需求量较低(P<0.001);
尽管与安慰剂相比,两种研究药物均产生了延长的术后镇痛效果,但普瑞巴林在术后镇痛方面的表现优于加巴喷丁。