Yoon Young Eun, Lee Hyung Ho, Park Sung Yul, Moon Hong Sang, Kim Dong Suk, Song Seung-Hun, Kim Dae Keun
Department of Urology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Korea Department of Urology, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital, Gyeonggi-do 10444, Korea Department of Urology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University, Seoul 06135, Korea Department of Urology, CHA Seoul Station Fertility Center, CHA University, Seoul 04637, Korea Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Graduate School, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Korea.
Asian J Androl. 2019 Jan 1;21(1):67-73. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_59_18.
This study comprises a systematic review and meta.analysis of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy outcomes in epididymal obstructive azoospermia. A comprehensive literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane library that included all studies related to microsurgical vasoepididymostomy. Keywords included "vasoepididymostomy" "epididymovasostomy" "epididymal obstruction" and "epididymis obstruction" Event rate and risk ratio (RR) were estimated. Patency rate and pregnancy rate were investigated. The analysis comprised 1422 articles, including 42 observational studies with 2298 enrolled patients performed from November 1978 to January 2017. The overall mean patency rate was 64.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.5%.69.3%; I2 =83.0%), and the overall mean pregnancy rate was 31.1% (95% CI: 26.9%.35.7%; I2 =73.0%). We performed a meta-analysis comparing the patency rate of bilateral microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and unilateral microsurgical vasoepididymostomy and found an RR of 1.38% (95% CI: 1.21%-1.57%; P < 0.00001). A comparison of the site of microsurgical vasoepididymostomy showed that caudal or corpus area was favorable for patency rate (RR = 1.17%; 95% CI: 1.01%-1.35%; P = 0.04). Patients with motile sperm in epididymal fluid exhibited an RR of 1.53% (95% CI: 1.11%-2.13%; P = 0.01) with respect to patency rate. Microsurgical vasoepididymostomy is an effective treatment for epididymal obstructive azoospermia that can improve male fertility. We find that performing microsurgical vasoepididymostomy bilaterally, anastomosing a larger caudal area, and containing motile sperm in epididymis fluid can potentially achieve a superior patency rate.
本研究包括对附睾梗阻性无精子症患者显微外科输精管附睾吻合术结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。使用Medline、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面的文献检索,纳入了所有与显微外科输精管附睾吻合术相关的研究。关键词包括“输精管附睾吻合术”“附睾输精管吻合术”“附睾梗阻”和“附睾阻塞”。对事件发生率和风险比(RR)进行了估计。对通畅率和妊娠率进行了调查。该分析共纳入1422篇文章,其中包括42项观察性研究,涉及1978年11月至2017年1月期间纳入的2298例患者。总体平均通畅率为64.1%(95%置信区间[CI]:58.5% - 69.3%;I² = 83.0%),总体平均妊娠率为31.1%(95% CI:26.9% - 35.7%;I² = 73.0%)。我们进行了一项荟萃分析,比较双侧显微外科输精管附睾吻合术和单侧显微外科输精管附睾吻合术的通畅率,发现风险比为1.38%(95% CI:1.21% - 1.57%;P < 0.00001)。对显微外科输精管附睾吻合术部位的比较显示,尾部或体部区域的通畅率更高(RR = 1.17%;95% CI:1.01% - 1.35%;P = 0.04)。附睾液中有活动精子的患者,其通畅率的风险比为1.53%(95% CI:1.11% - 2.13%;P = 0.01)。显微外科输精管附睾吻合术是治疗附睾梗阻性无精子症的有效方法,可提高男性生育能力。我们发现,双侧进行显微外科输精管附睾吻合术、吻合较大的尾部区域以及附睾液中含有活动精子可能会获得更高的通畅率。