Bailer Christian, Taetz Bertram, Stricker Didier
IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2019 Aug;41(8):1879-1892. doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2018.2859970. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
Modern large displacement optical flow algorithms usually use an initialization by either sparse descriptor matching techniques or dense approximate nearest neighbor fields. While the latter have the advantage of being dense, they have the major disadvantage of being very outlier-prone as they are not designed to find the optical flow, but the visually most similar correspondence. In this article we present a dense correspondence field approach that is much less outlier-prone and thus much better suited for optical flow estimation than approximate nearest neighbor fields. Our approach does not require explicit regularization, smoothing (like median filtering) or a new data term. Instead we solely rely on patch matching techniques and a novel multi-scale matching strategy. We also present enhancements for outlier filtering. We show that our approach is better suited for large displacement optical flow estimation than modern descriptor matching techniques. We do so by initializing EpicFlow with our approach instead of their originally used state-of-the-art descriptor matching technique. We significantly outperform the original EpicFlow on MPI-Sintel, KITTI 2012, KITTI 2015 and Middlebury. In this extended article of our former conference publication we further improve our approach in matching accuracy as well as runtime and present more experiments and insights.
现代大位移光流算法通常通过稀疏描述符匹配技术或密集近似最近邻场进行初始化。虽然后者具有密集的优点,但它们有一个主要缺点,即非常容易受到异常值的影响,因为它们不是为了找到光流而设计的,而是为了找到视觉上最相似的对应关系。在本文中,我们提出了一种密集对应场方法,该方法比近似最近邻场更不容易受到异常值的影响,因此更适合用于光流估计。我们的方法不需要显式正则化、平滑(如中值滤波)或新的数据项。相反,我们仅依赖于块匹配技术和一种新颖的多尺度匹配策略。我们还提出了异常值滤波的增强方法。我们表明,我们的方法比现代描述符匹配技术更适合大位移光流估计。我们通过用我们的方法而不是他们原来使用的最先进的描述符匹配技术初始化EpicFlow来做到这一点。在MPI-Sintel、KITTI 2012、KITTI 2015和Middlebury数据集上,我们显著优于原始的EpicFlow。在我们之前会议出版物的这篇扩展文章中,我们在匹配精度和运行时方面进一步改进了我们的方法,并展示了更多的实验和见解。