Liang Yulin, Zou Junbo, Zhang Xiaofei, Wang Yu, Tai Jia, Guo Dongyan, Cui Chunli, Wang Jing, Cheng Jiangxue, Shi Yajun
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China.
Department of Pharmaceutics, College of Pharmacy, The Key Laboratory of Basic and New Drug Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China.
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2018 Jul 18;2018:3429151. doi: 10.1155/2018/3429151. eCollection 2018.
To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Compound Danshen Dripping Pill (CDDP) and Isosorbide Mononitrate (ISMN) in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris (UAP) in the elderly.
CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, CBM, and PubMed databases were searched for appropriate articles without language limitations on keywords. RevMan 5.3 software was used to perform the meta-analysis.
This analysis compared CDDP with ISMN of 21 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved a total of 2356 patients with UAP. When the treatment lasted for four weeks, the clinical effective rate was OR = 3.97, 95% CI = 2.97, 5.30, and < 0.00001, the ECG efficiency was OR = 3.43, 95% CI = 2.13, 5.53, and < 0.00001, and incidence of adverse reactions was OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.52, 1.04, and = 0.08 > 0.05. When the treatment lasted for eight weeks, clinical efficiency rate was OR = 4.22, 95% CI = 2.37, 3.79, and < 0.00001, incidence of adverse reactions was OR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.26, 1.27, and = 0.17 > 0.05, whole blood low-cut blood viscosity was SMD = -0.61 and 95% CI -1.60, 0.38, whole blood high-cut blood viscosity was SMD = -0.38 and 95% CI -0.97, 0.21, and blood cells specific volume was SMD = -0.80 and 95% CI -2.61, 1.01.
Based on this meta-analysis, the CDDP was superior to ISMN with UAP in the elderly. However, there is still a need to further verify the clinical efficacy and safety of CDDP with more strictly designed RCTs with large sample and multiple centers in the future.
评价复方丹参滴丸(CDDP)与单硝酸异山梨酯(ISMN)治疗老年不稳定型心绞痛(UAP)的临床疗效及安全性。
检索中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)及PubMed数据库,以关键词检索合适的文章,无语言限制。采用RevMan 5.3软件进行荟萃分析。
本分析比较了CDDP与ISMN用于21项随机对照试验(RCT),共纳入2356例UAP患者。治疗4周时,临床有效率的比值比(OR)=3.97,95%置信区间(CI)=2.97,5.30,P<0.00001;心电图改善有效率的OR=3.43,95%CI=2.13,5.53,P<0.00001;不良反应发生率的OR=0.73,95%CI=0.52,1.04,P=0.08>0.05。治疗8周时,临床有效率的OR=4.22,95%CI=2.37,3.79,P<0.00001;不良反应发生率的OR=0.58,95%CI=0.26,1.27,P=0.17>0.05;全血低切黏度的标准化均数差(SMD)=-0.61,95%CI=-1.60,0.38;全血高切黏度的SMD=-0.38,95%CI=-0.97,0.21;血细胞比容的SMD=-0.80,95%CI=-2.61,1.01。
基于本荟萃分析,CDDP治疗老年UAP优于ISMN。然而,未来仍需通过设计更严格的大样本多中心RCT进一步验证CDDP的临床疗效及安全性。