Parmeshwar Nisha, Reid Chris M, Park Andrew J, Brandel Michael G, Dobke Marek K, Gosman Amanda A
School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Department of Plastic Surgery, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, USA.
Cureus. 2018 Jun 9;10(6):e2773. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2773.
Background Today, patients can access a myriad of information sources regarding plastic surgery procedures prior to meeting with a surgeon. Despite their widespread use, the role of these sources in a patient's decision-making remains undefined. We hypothesized that the physician remains the key information source for patients making surgical decisions in plastic surgery, but that other sources may deliver important insights and prove helpful to varying degrees. We also explored motivations for this outside information search and any differences in perceived value among patients. Methods We administered a survey regarding various information sources to our breast reconstruction, reduction, and abdominoplasty patients. Responses were compared between surgery groups and demographic groups. Ordinal logistic regression analysis was used to determine the impact of patient characteristics on helpfulness rank of different sources. Results Survey results were obtained from 58 patients, of whom 10 (17.2%) had abdominoplasty, 35 (60.3%) breast reconstruction, and 13 (22.4%) breast reduction. The most popular information sources prior to the first surgical appointment were Internet searches (56.9%) and family/friends/other patients (39.7%). After the initial appointment, the most useful sources were plastic surgeons (84.5%), and the Internet (36.2%). Most patients (73.5%) still sought outside information after their appointment. On a Likert-type scale of helpfulness, plastic surgeons ranked 4.28/5, followed by the web-based patient education platform, 3.73 and the Internet, 3.6. A total of 63% of participants listed plastic surgeons as their single most important source of information. In ordinal logistic regression analysis, non-white race was significantly associated with higher rank of surgeon helpfulness (p < 0.05). Relative to low-income patients, income $50-100k (p < 0.05) and $100k+ (p < 0.05) were associated with lower rank of surgeon helpfulness. Conclusions Most patients seek outside information prior to visiting with a surgeon from the Internet, social media, or family and friends. Patients consider plastic surgeons their most valuable information source overall, though still in need of supplementation for varying reasons. Additionally, certain demographic differences affect patient perception of information sources, and this is an important factor for surgeons to consider as they approach educating patients.
背景 如今,患者在与外科医生会面之前可以获取大量有关整形手术的信息来源。尽管这些来源被广泛使用,但它们在患者决策中的作用仍不明确。我们假设医生仍然是整形手术患者做出手术决策的关键信息来源,但其他来源可能会提供重要见解,并在不同程度上被证明是有帮助的。我们还探讨了这种外部信息搜索的动机以及患者之间感知价值的差异。方法 我们对接受乳房重建、缩小和腹部整形手术的患者进行了一项关于各种信息来源的调查。比较了手术组和人口统计学组之间的回答。使用有序逻辑回归分析来确定患者特征对不同来源有用性排名的影响。结果 共获得58名患者的调查结果,其中10名(17.2%)接受了腹部整形手术,35名(60.3%)接受了乳房重建手术,13名(22.4%)接受了乳房缩小手术。首次手术预约前最受欢迎的信息来源是互联网搜索(56.9%)和家人/朋友/其他患者(39.7%)。初次预约后,最有用的信息来源是整形外科医生(84.5%)和互联网(36.2%)。大多数患者(73.5%)在预约后仍会寻求外部信息。在李克特式有用性量表上,整形外科医生的排名为4.28/5,其次是基于网络的患者教育平台,为3.73,互联网为3.6。共有63%的参与者将整形外科医生列为他们最重要的单一信息来源。在有序逻辑回归分析中,非白人种族与外科医生有用性排名较高显著相关(p < 0.05)。相对于低收入患者,收入在5万至10万美元(p < 0.05)和10万美元以上(p < 0.05)与外科医生有用性排名较低相关。结论 大多数患者在拜访外科医生之前会从互联网、社交媒体或家人和朋友那里寻求外部信息。患者总体上认为整形外科医生是他们最有价值的信息来源,不过由于各种原因仍需要补充信息。此外,某些人口统计学差异会影响患者对信息来源的认知,这是外科医生在对患者进行教育时需要考虑的一个重要因素。