• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项使用经龈下饰瓷和未饰瓷氧化锆基台支持全瓷单颗种植体牙冠的随机对照临床试验的三年结果

Three-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Using Submucosally Veneered and Unveneered Zirconia Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Single-Implant Crowns.

作者信息

Eisner Barbara, Naenni Nadja, Hüsler Jürg, Hämmerle Christoph, Thoma Daniel, Sailer Irena

出版信息

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Sep/Oct;38(5):645-652. doi: 10.11607/prd.3669.

DOI:10.11607/prd.3669
PMID:30113604
Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the influence of veneering of the submucosal part of zirconia abutments on biologic, radiographic, technical, and esthetic outcomes in single-tooth implant sites. A total of 20 patients each received a zirconia abutment to support an all-ceramic implant-supported crown. Patients were randomly assigned to the test group (n = 10), in which the abutment was modified with pink veneering ceramic, or to a control group (n = 10) without further submucosal customization. Patients were followed up at baseline (after the insertion of the final reconstruction) and yearly thereafter. Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the difference between the medians of the two groups, whereas Wilcoxon signed rank test allowed calculation of the differences per group. At 3 years, 18 patients could be recalled. The survival rates reached 100% (implant level) and 95% (restorative level). Two implant crowns experienced minor chipping, one in each group. No significant intergroup differences were observed regarding mucosa thickness between the groups. The width of keratinized tissue did not change significantly over time in either group. The radiographic evaluation showed no significant differences regarding the marginal bone level at any timepoint between the groups. Changes over time reached -0.27 mm (SD 0.41, median -0.26) for the test group and -0.21 mm (SD 0.30, median -0.31) for the control group. Statistical significance was not reached within or between the groups. Veneering of the submucosal part of zirconia abutments did not significantly influence biologic and technical outcomes in single-tooth implant sites up to 3 years.

摘要

本研究旨在评估氧化锆基台黏膜下部分的贴面处理对单颗牙种植部位的生物学、影像学、技术和美学效果的影响。共有20名患者各接受了一个氧化锆基台来支持全瓷种植体支持的牙冠。患者被随机分配到试验组(n = 10),其中基台用粉色贴面陶瓷进行了改良,或分配到对照组(n = 10),未进行进一步的黏膜下定制。在基线时(最终修复体植入后)以及此后每年对患者进行随访。采用Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney检验评估两组中位数之间的差异,而Wilcoxon符号秩检验则用于计算每组的差异。3年后,18名患者可以被召回。生存率达到100%(种植体水平)和95%(修复体水平)。两个种植体牙冠出现了轻微崩瓷,每组各有一个。两组之间在黏膜厚度方面未观察到显著的组间差异。角化组织的宽度在两组中随时间均未发生显著变化。影像学评估显示,两组在任何时间点的边缘骨水平均无显著差异。试验组随时间的变化为-0.27 mm(标准差0.41,中位数-0.26),对照组为-0.21 mm(标准差0.30,中位数-0.31)。组内和组间均未达到统计学显著性。氧化锆基台黏膜下部分的贴面处理在长达3年的时间内对单颗牙种植部位的生物学和技术效果没有显著影响。

相似文献

1
Three-Year Results of a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Using Submucosally Veneered and Unveneered Zirconia Abutments Supporting All-Ceramic Single-Implant Crowns.一项使用经龈下饰瓷和未饰瓷氧化锆基台支持全瓷单颗种植体牙冠的随机对照临床试验的三年结果
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2018 Sep/Oct;38(5):645-652. doi: 10.11607/prd.3669.
2
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of All-Ceramic Single-Tooth Implant Reconstructions Using Modified Zirconia Abutments: Results at 5 Years After Loading.使用改良氧化锆基台的全瓷单颗牙种植修复的随机对照临床试验:加载后5年的结果
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2019 Jan/Feb;39(1):17-27. doi: 10.11607/prd.3792.
3
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of All-Ceramic Single Tooth Implant Reconstructions Using Modified Zirconia Abutments: Radiographic and Prosthetic Results at 1 Year of Loading.使用改良氧化锆基台的全瓷单颗牙种植修复的随机对照临床试验:加载1年后的影像学和修复结果
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Jun;18(3):462-72. doi: 10.1111/cid.12333. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
4
Randomized controlled clinical pilot study of all-ceramic single-tooth implant reconstructions: clinical and microbiological outcomes at one year of loading.全瓷单颗牙种植修复的随机对照临床试验性研究:加载一年后的临床和微生物学结果
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Apr;28(4):406-413. doi: 10.1111/clr.12813. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
5
Esthetic and Clinical Performance of Implant-Supported All-Ceramic Crowns Made with Prefabricated or CAD/CAM Zirconia Abutments: A Randomized, Multicenter Clinical Trial.预制或 CAD/CAM 氧化锆基台制作的种植体支持全瓷冠的美观和临床效果:一项随机、多中心临床试验。
J Dent Res. 2017 Feb;96(2):163-170. doi: 10.1177/0022034516681767. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
6
Randomized controlled clinical study of veneered zirconia abutments for single implant crowns: Clinical, histological, and microbiological outcomes.贴面氧化锆基台用于单牙种植体修复的随机对照临床研究:临床、组织学和微生物学结果。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2018 Dec;20(6):988-996. doi: 10.1111/cid.12674. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
7
SURVIVAL RATE OF IMPLANT-SUPPORTED, SINGLE-TOOTH RESTORATIONS BASED ON ZIRCONIA OR METAL ABUTMENT IN PATIENTS WITH TOOTH AGENESIS: A 5-YEARS PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY.基于种植体支持的、单牙修复的存活率:一项前瞻性临床研究,研究对象为牙缺失患者,修复体采用氧化锆或金属基台。
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2024 Jun;24(2):101970. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2024.101970. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
8
Spectrophotometric assessment of peri-implant mucosa after restoration with zirconia abutments veneered with fluorescent ceramic: a controlled, retrospective clinical study.用荧光陶瓷贴面氧化锆基台修复后种植体周围黏膜的分光光度评估:一项对照性回顾性临床研究。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Aug;24 Suppl A100:28-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02361.x. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
9
Five-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial comparing zirconia and titanium abutments supporting single-implant crowns in canine and posterior regions.一项比较犬齿和后牙区种植体支持的单冠修复中氧化锆和钛基台的随机对照临床试验的 5 年结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013 Apr;24(4):384-90. doi: 10.1111/clr.12044. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
10
The Esthetic Effect of Veneered Zirconia Abutments for Single-Tooth Implant Reconstructions: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.单颗牙种植修复中贴面氧化锆基台的美学效果:一项随机对照临床试验。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Dec;18(6):1210-1217. doi: 10.1111/cid.12388. Epub 2015 Dec 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Cemented versus screw-retained zirconia-based single-implant restorations: 5-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.水泥固位与螺钉固位氧化锆基单颗种植体修复体:一项随机对照临床试验的 5 年结果。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2022 Apr;33(4):353-361. doi: 10.1111/clr.13895. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
2
A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.系统评价和荟萃分析评估了饰面和整体式全陶瓷种植体支持的单冠的存活率、失败率和并发症发生率。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2021 Oct;32 Suppl 21(Suppl 21):254-288. doi: 10.1111/clr.13863.
3
Esthetic, mechanical, and biological outcomes of various implant abutments for single-tooth replacement in the anterior region: a systematic review of the literature.
在前牙区单颗牙缺失修复中,各种种植体基台的美观、力学和生物学效果:文献系统评价。
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Sep 8;7(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00370-7.