Section of Environmental Health, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Center for Healthy Aging, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 16;13(8):e0202395. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0202395. eCollection 2018.
Allostatic load has been suggested as a pathway through which experiences become biologically embedded to influence health. Research on childhood predictors of allostatic load has focused on socioeconomic and psychosocial exposures, while few studies include prospective measures of biomedical exposures. Further, findings on sex differences in the association of childhood predictors with various health outcomes related to allostatic load are ambiguous.
To examine the influence of early life biomedical and social factors in the first year of life on midlife allostatic load, assessing potential sex differences.
This prospective cohort study includes early life information collected at birth and a one year examination for 1,648 members of the Copenhagen Perinatal Cohort who also participated in the Copenhagen Aging and Midlife Biobank study (aged 49-52 years, 56% women). Allostatic load based on 14 biomarkers was selected as a measure of midlife health status. Early life factors were categorized as predominantly biomedical or social, and their associations with midlife allostatic load were examined in domain-specific and combined sex-stratified multiple regression models.
The biomedical factors model explained 6.6% of the variance in midlife allostatic load in men and 6.7% in women, while the social model explained 4.1% of the variance in men and 7.3% in women. For both sexes, parental socioeconomic position at one year and maternal BMI significantly predicted midlife allostatic load in a model containing all early life factors. For women, additional significant predictors were complications at birth, birth weight and not living with parents at one year.
The results confirm an association of lower childhood socioeconomic position with higher adult allostatic load while demonstrating the importance of other prenatal and early life exposures and highlighting potential sex differences.
压力负荷被认为是一种途径,通过它,经历会在生物学上被嵌入,从而影响健康。 关于儿童时期压力负荷预测因素的研究主要集中在社会经济和心理社会暴露上,而很少有研究包括对生物医学暴露的前瞻性测量。 此外,关于儿童时期预测因素与与压力负荷相关的各种健康结果之间的关联的性别差异的研究结果还不明确。
研究生命早期生物医学和社会因素对中年压力负荷的影响,并评估潜在的性别差异。
本前瞻性队列研究包括在生命第一年收集的早期生活信息,以及对参加哥本哈根衰老和中年生物库研究的 1648 名哥本哈根围产期队列成员的一年一次检查(年龄在 49-52 岁之间,女性占 56%)。 基于 14 种生物标志物的压力负荷被选为衡量中年健康状况的指标。 早期生活因素分为主要是生物医学或社会因素,并在特定领域和联合性别分层的多元回归模型中检查它们与中年压力负荷的关联。
生物医学因素模型解释了男性中年压力负荷的 6.6%的方差和女性的 6.7%,而社会模型解释了男性的 4.1%和女性的 7.3%。 对于男性和女性来说,一岁时父母的社会经济地位和母亲的 BMI 在包含所有早期生活因素的模型中显著预测了中年压力负荷。 对于女性来说,额外的显著预测因素是出生时的并发症、出生体重和一岁时不与父母同住。
研究结果证实了较低的儿童社会经济地位与较高的成年压力负荷之间的关联,同时也证明了其他产前和早期生活暴露的重要性,并强调了潜在的性别差异。