Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Oral Oncol. 2018 Sep;84:82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.07.013. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
The American Joint Committee on Cancer, 8th edition (AJCC-8) contains a new staging system for human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC). Our study aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of the AJCC-8 relative to the AJCC 7th edition (AJCC-7).
A retrospective chart review was performed on a multi-institutional, prospectively collected dataset from two tertiary referral centers. All patients had HPV+ OPSCC treated primarily with surgery. The prognostic value of AJCC-7 and AJCC-8 were compared for 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DFS).
AJCC-8 pathological staging effectively risk stratified patients, creating a Cox model with a better fit (lower Akaike's Information Criterion, p < 0.0001) when compared to AJCC-7 pathological stages for both OS and DFS. The AJCC-8 pathologic staging did not produce a better fit than the AJCC-8 clinical staging (p = 0.15) for OS, however, AJCC-8 pathologic was more effective than AJCC-8 clinical for DFS (p < 0.0001). 76% of patients did not change their stage between clinical and pathologic AJCC-8 staging; 14% were upstaged by 1, <1% were upstaged by 2, 7% were downstaged by 1, and 3% downstaged by 2.
The new AJCC-8 staging system represents a significant improvement over AJCC-7 for risk stratification into groups that predict overall survival and disease-specific survival of surgically treated HPV+ OPSCC patients. The AJCC- 8 pathologic staging system was not significantly better than the AJCC-8 clinical staging system for overall survival, however, the pathologic staging system was better than the clinical for disease free survival.
第 8 版美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC-8)包含了一种新的人类乳头瘤病毒(HPV)相关口咽鳞状细胞癌(OPSCC)分期系统。我们的研究目的是评估 AJCC-8 与第 7 版 AJCC(AJCC-7)相比的有效性。
对来自两个三级转诊中心的多机构前瞻性收集数据集进行了回顾性图表审查。所有患者均接受 HPV+ OPSCC 的主要手术治疗。比较 AJCC-7 和 AJCC-8 的 5 年总生存率(OS)和疾病特异性生存率(DFS)的预后价值。
AJCC-8 病理分期有效地对患者进行了风险分层,与 AJCC-7 病理分期相比,构建的 Cox 模型拟合度更好(Akaike 信息准则更低,p<0.0001),无论是在 OS 还是 DFS 方面。AJCC-8 病理分期与 AJCC-8 临床分期相比并没有产生更好的拟合度(p=0.15),但是 AJCC-8 病理分期在 DFS 方面比 AJCC-8 临床分期更有效(p<0.0001)。76%的患者在临床和病理 AJCC-8 分期之间没有改变其分期;14%的患者分期增加 1 级,<1%的患者分期增加 2 级,7%的患者分期减少 1 级,3%的患者分期减少 2 级。
新的 AJCC-8 分期系统在风险分层方面明显优于 AJCC-7,可预测 HPV+ OPSCC 患者接受手术治疗后的总生存率和疾病特异性生存率。AJCC-8 病理分期系统在总生存率方面并不优于 AJCC-8 临床分期系统,但在无病生存率方面优于临床分期系统。