Fan Zhiwei, Yotsumoto Yuko
Department of Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 2;9:1340. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01340. eCollection 2018.
Previous studies on time perception and temporal memory have focused primarily on single time intervals; it is still unclear how multiple time intervals are perceived and maintained in working memory. In the present study, using Sternberg's item recognition task, we compared the working memory of multiple items with different time intervals and visual textures, for sub- and supra-second ranges, and investigated the characteristics of working memory representation in the framework of the signal detection theory. In Experiments 1-3, gratings with different spatial frequencies and time intervals were sequentially presented as study items, followed by another grating as a probe. Participants determined whether the probe matched one of the study gratings, in either the temporal dimension or in the visual dimension. The results exhibited typical working memory characteristics such as the effects of memory load, serial position, and similarity between probe and study gratings, similarly, to the time intervals and visual textures. However, there were some differences between the two conditions. Specifically, the recency effect for time intervals was smaller, or even absent, as compared to that for visual textures. Further, as compared with visual textures, sub-second intervals were more likely to be judged as remembered in working memory. In addition, we found interactions between visual texture memory and time interval memory, and such visual-interval binding differed between sub- and supra-second ranges. Our results indicate that multiple time intervals are stored as discrete items in working memory, similarly, to visual texture memory, but the former might be more susceptible to decay than the latter. The differences in the binding between sub- and supra-second ranges imply that working memory for sub- and supra-second ranges may differ in the relatively higher decision stage.
以往关于时间感知和时间记忆的研究主要集中在单个时间间隔上;目前尚不清楚多个时间间隔在工作记忆中是如何被感知和维持的。在本研究中,我们使用斯特恩伯格的项目识别任务,比较了不同时间间隔和视觉纹理的多个项目在亚秒和超秒范围内的工作记忆,并在信号检测理论的框架内研究了工作记忆表征的特征。在实验1-3中,依次呈现具有不同空间频率和时间间隔的光栅作为学习项目,随后呈现另一个光栅作为探测刺激。参与者判断探测刺激在时间维度或视觉维度上是否与学习光栅之一匹配。结果显示出典型的工作记忆特征,如记忆负荷、序列位置以及探测刺激与学习光栅之间的相似性的影响,与时间间隔和视觉纹理的情况类似。然而,两种条件之间存在一些差异。具体而言,与视觉纹理相比,时间间隔的近因效应较小,甚至不存在。此外,与视觉纹理相比,亚秒间隔在工作记忆中更有可能被判断为被记住。另外,我们发现视觉纹理记忆和时间间隔记忆之间存在相互作用,并且这种视觉-间隔绑定在亚秒和超秒范围内有所不同。我们的结果表明,多个时间间隔在工作记忆中作为离散项目存储,与视觉纹理记忆类似,但前者可能比后者更容易衰退。亚秒和超秒范围之间绑定的差异意味着亚秒和超秒范围的工作记忆在相对较高的决策阶段可能有所不同。