• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

选择如何影响风险处理:一项事件相关电位研究。

How choice influences risk processing: An ERP study.

作者信息

Yi Wei, Mei Shuting, Li Qi, Liu Xun, Zheng Ya

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China.

CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing, China; Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Biol Psychol. 2018 Oct;138:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.08.011
PMID:30118756
Abstract

The current study examined how the experience of choice by which individuals exercise control modulates risk processing during the anticipatory phase as indexed by the stimulus-preceding negativity (SPN), and the consummatory phase as indexed by the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and feedback P3 (fb-P3). Twenty-four participants performed a simple gambling task during which they could win or lose either a small (a low-risk condition) or a large (a high-risk condition) amount of points by either choosing freely between two doors (a choice condition) or accepting a computer-selected door (a no-choice condition) while their EEG was recorded. As expected, participants rated the high-risk condition as more risky than the low-risk condition and reported higher feelings of control for the choice versus no-choice condition. Regardless of the involvement of choice, risk processing in this task was associated with greater fb-P3 amplitudes. However, during the choice condition, risk processing was associated with a more negative SPN during the anticipatory phase and a more positive FRN during the consummatory phase, which was absent (the SPN) or reduced (the FRN) in the no-choice condition. These findings suggest that the modulation of risk processing by choice occurs during both the anticipatory phase and the consummatory phase, which may be driven by motivation salience imposed by control.

摘要

当前研究考察了个体通过行使控制权进行选择的体验如何调节预期阶段的风险处理(以刺激前负波(SPN)为指标)以及消费阶段的风险处理(以反馈相关负波(FRN)和反馈P3(fb-P3)为指标)。24名参与者执行了一项简单的赌博任务,在此过程中,他们可以通过在两扇门之间自由选择(选择条件)或接受计算机选择的门(无选择条件)来赢取或输掉少量(低风险条件)或大量(高风险条件)的分数,同时记录他们的脑电图。正如预期的那样,参与者认为高风险条件比低风险条件风险更大,并报告说与无选择条件相比,选择条件下的控制感更强。无论是否涉及选择,该任务中的风险处理都与更大的fb-P3波幅相关。然而,在选择条件下,风险处理在预期阶段与更负的SPN相关,在消费阶段与更正的FRN相关,而在无选择条件下则不存在(SPN)或减弱(FRN)。这些发现表明,选择对风险处理的调节发生在预期阶段和消费阶段,这可能是由控制施加的动机显著性驱动的。

相似文献

1
How choice influences risk processing: An ERP study.选择如何影响风险处理:一项事件相关电位研究。
Biol Psychol. 2018 Oct;138:223-230. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Aug 15.
2
Reward processing in gain versus loss context: An ERP study.收益与损失情境下的奖赏加工:一项事件相关电位研究。
Psychophysiology. 2017 Jul;54(7):1040-1053. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12855. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
3
The time course of incentive processing in anticipatory and consummatory anhedonia.期待性和满足性快感缺失中激励加工的时程。
J Affect Disord. 2018 Oct 1;238:442-450. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.05.053. Epub 2018 May 29.
4
Elevated outcome-anticipation and outcome-evaluation ERPs associated with a greater preference for larger-but-delayed rewards.与对更大但延迟奖励的更强偏好相关的预期结果和评估结果的事件相关电位升高。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2017 Jun;17(3):625-641. doi: 10.3758/s13415-017-0501-4.
5
ERP correlates of valence asymmetry during incentive anticipation.ERP 与激励预期过程中的效价不对称相关。
Psychophysiology. 2018 Nov;55(11):e13213. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13213. Epub 2018 Aug 2.
6
Teasing apart the anticipatory and consummatory processing of monetary incentives: An event-related potential study of reward dynamics.剖析货币激励的预期与满足过程:奖励动态的事件相关电位研究
Psychophysiology. 2015 Nov;52(11):1470-82. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12504. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
7
Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.超越 FRN:拓宽与奖励加工相关的 EEG 和 ERP 成分的时程。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2018 Oct;132(Pt B):184-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2018.02.002. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
Contextual valence modulates the effect of choice on incentive processing.语境效价调节选择对激励加工的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):1249-1258. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy098.
9
Diminished choice effect on anticipating improbable rewards.期待不可能回报时选择减少的效应。
Neuropsychologia. 2018 Mar;111:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.015. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
10
Motivated to win: Relationship between anticipatory and outcome reward-related neural activity.志在夺冠:预期奖励与结果奖励相关神经活动之间的关系。
Brain Cogn. 2015 Nov;100:21-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Oct 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural dynamics underlying the illusion of control during reward processing.奖励加工过程中控制错觉的神经动力学基础。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024 Oct 10;19(1). doi: 10.1093/scan/nsae063.
2
Acute stress selectively blunts reward anticipation but not consumption: An ERP study.急性应激选择性地减弱奖励预期而非奖励消费:一项事件相关电位研究。
Neurobiol Stress. 2023 Oct 27;27:100583. doi: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2023.100583. eCollection 2023 Nov.
3
Enterprise resource planning implementation within science and technology park (STP) organisations: an avenue for future research. A systematic review.
科技园区(STP)组织内的企业资源规划实施:未来研究的途径。系统评价。
F1000Res. 2023 Aug 10;10:1148. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.73347.3. eCollection 2021.
4
The value of an action: Impact of motor behaviour on outcome processing and stimulus preference.行为的价值:运动行为对结果加工和刺激偏好的影响。
Eur J Neurosci. 2022 Nov;56(10):5823-5835. doi: 10.1111/ejn.15826. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
5
The Interplay Between Affective Processing and Sense of Agency During Action Regulation: A Review.行动调节过程中情感加工与能动感之间的相互作用:一项综述
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 16;12:716220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.716220. eCollection 2021.
6
Towards a Functional Neuromarker of Impulsivity: Feedback-Related Brain Potential during Risky Decision-Making Associated with Self-Reported Impulsivity in a Non-Clinical Sample.寻求一种冲动性的功能性神经标志物:非临床样本中与自我报告的冲动性相关的风险决策过程中的反馈相关脑电位
Brain Sci. 2021 May 21;11(6):671. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060671.
7
Functional heterogeneity of perceived control in feedback processing.反馈加工中感知控制的功能异质性。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2020 May 19;15(3):329-336. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa028.
8
Assessing Feedback Response With a Wearable Electroencephalography System.使用可穿戴脑电图系统评估反馈反应。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Jul 25;13:258. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00258. eCollection 2019.
9
Contextual valence modulates the effect of choice on incentive processing.语境效价调节选择对激励加工的影响。
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2018 Dec 4;13(12):1249-1258. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsy098.