Aronova Elena
Department of History, University of California - Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, 93106-9410, California, USA.
Stud Hist Philos Sci. 2018 Aug;70:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.05.008. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
A familiar story of seismology is that of a small field originally focused on local studies of earthquakes through diverse disciplinary perspectives being transformed, in the second half of the twentieth century, into a highly specialized field focused on global studies of the earth's deep interior via sophisticated instruments and transnational networks of seismological stations. Against this backdrop, this essay offers a complementing account, highlighting the significance of local circumstances and disciplinary agendas that were contingent not only on transformations in the geophysical sciences but also on the concurrently changing biological sciences during the Cold War. Using examples of the studies of unusual animal behavior prior to earthquakes conducted under the auspices of the US Geological Survey on the West Coast of the United States in the 1970s, this essay examines a variety of motivations behind the attempts to bridge geophysics and biology. These examples illustrate the ways in which earthquake prediction became entangled with concerns over the use of seismological data, pioneering research on biological rhythms, and the troubled field of Cold War-driven military brain studies.
地震学中一个为人熟知的故事是,一个原本通过不同学科视角专注于本地地震研究的小领域,在20世纪下半叶,经由精密仪器和跨国地震台网,转变为一个高度专业化的领域,专注于地球深部内部的全球研究。在此背景下,本文提供了一个补充叙述,强调了当地情况和学科议程的重要性,这些情况和议程不仅取决于地球物理科学的变革,还取决于冷战期间同时发生变化的生物科学。本文以20世纪70年代美国地质调查局在美国西海岸主持下进行的地震前异常动物行为研究为例,探讨了将地球物理学与生物学联系起来的各种动机。这些例子说明了地震预测如何与对地震数据使用的担忧、生物节律的开创性研究以及冷战驱动的军事大脑研究这一麻烦领域纠缠在一起。