• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植领域的系统评价和荟萃分析:挑战与陷阱?

Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Transplantation: Challenges and Pitfalls?

机构信息

Centre for Transplant and Renal Research, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia.

Centre for Kidney Research, Kids Research Institute, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

Transplantation. 2018 Sep;102(9):1415-1418. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002314.

DOI:10.1097/TP.0000000000002314
PMID:30124633
Abstract

Decision making in transplantation is complex, dynamic, and often made under the context of uncertainties. In the case of diagnostic uncertainties, symptoms can be indistinct, with overlap between many different conditions. Even if the correct diagnoses are known, treatment strategies for the same condition may vary and are largely dependent on clinicians' preference and personal experiences. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses challenge the conventional role of the experts and their perceptions and rely, instead, on the best available evidence to guide clinical decision making. Through careful searching and closely examining, appraising, and synthesizing all available evidence, systematic reviews and meta-analyses provide the necessary and relevant information to better inform healthcare management and policy making by highlighting evidence that is pertinent to decisions. This commentary provides an overview of the concepts and methods used in systematic review, highlighting the potential capability of these methods in transplantation and how they may facilitate clinical decision making in transplantation.

摘要

移植决策是复杂的、动态的,并且常常是在不确定的情况下做出的。在诊断不确定的情况下,症状可能不明显,许多不同的病症之间存在重叠。即使知道正确的诊断,同一病症的治疗策略也可能有所不同,而且在很大程度上取决于临床医生的偏好和个人经验。系统评价和荟萃分析挑战了专家的传统作用及其观念,而是依赖于最佳可用证据来指导临床决策。通过仔细搜索、仔细检查、评估和综合所有可用证据,系统评价和荟萃分析通过突出与决策相关的证据,为更好地告知医疗保健管理和政策制定提供了必要和相关的信息。本评论概述了系统评价中使用的概念和方法,强调了这些方法在移植中的潜在能力,以及它们如何有助于移植中的临床决策。

相似文献

1
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Transplantation: Challenges and Pitfalls?移植领域的系统评价和荟萃分析:挑战与陷阱?
Transplantation. 2018 Sep;102(9):1415-1418. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002314.
2
Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.基于证据的医学、系统评价以及介入性疼痛管理指南:第6部分。观察性研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2009 Sep-Oct;12(5):819-50.
3
Systematic reviews and meta-analysis in rheumatology: a gentle introduction for clinicians.风湿病学中的系统评价和荟萃分析:临床医生的入门指南。
Clin Rheumatol. 2019 Aug;38(8):2029-2038. doi: 10.1007/s10067-019-04590-6. Epub 2019 May 17.
4
Discrepancies between beliefs and behavior: a prospective study into immunosuppressive medication adherence after kidney transplantation.信念与行为之间的差异:一项关于肾移植后免疫抑制药物依从性的前瞻性研究。
Transplantation. 2015 Feb;99(2):375-80. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000000608.
5
Evidence-Based Decision-Making 2: Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.循证决策 2:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Methods Mol Biol. 2021;2249:405-428. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1138-8_22.
6
Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Sometimes Bigger Is Indeed Better.系统评价和荟萃分析:有时更大确实更好。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Mar;128(3):575-583. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004014.
7
Meta-analysis: mistake or milestone in medicine?荟萃分析:医学领域的错误还是里程碑?
Heart. 2018 Oct;104(19):1559-1561. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-313042. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
8
Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.循证实践:如何进行和使用系统评价进行临床决策。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2010 Sep;27(9):763-72. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833a560a.
9
Induction Immunosuppression in High-risk Kidney Transplant Recipients.高危肾移植受者的诱导免疫抑制
Exp Clin Transplant. 2016 Aug;14(4):367-76. doi: 10.6002/ect.2015.0328. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
10
[Systematic reviews and metaanalyses. Basic knowledge, strengths and weaknesses of an important tool for healthcare professionals].[系统评价与荟萃分析。医疗保健专业人员重要工具的基础知识、优势与不足]
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther. 2010 Jul;45(7-8):510-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1262480. Epub 2010 Jul 21.