Nicolas V, Lackner K, Becher H, Grube E
Rofo. 1986 May;144(5):499-505. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1048828.
In twenty-two patients with coronary heart disease, selective coronary angiography and laevo-cardiography were carried out by means of conventional cine angiography and intra-arterial DSA. For evaluating left ventricular function, intra-arterial DSA and cine angiography were of equal value (r = 0.97). A significant advantage of DSA was the fact that it is easily reproducible. On the other hand, DSA is less good for quantifying coronary stenoses and for demonstrating the peripheral vessels.
对22例冠心病患者，采用传统电影血管造影术和动脉内数字减影血管造影术（DSA）进行选择性冠状动脉造影和左心室造影。就评估左心室功能而言，动脉内DSA和电影血管造影术价值相当（r = 0.97）。DSA的一个显著优点是其易于重复。另一方面，DSA在量化冠状动脉狭窄和显示外周血管方面效果较差。
