Jakovljevic Mihajlo, Camilleri Carl, Rancic Nemanja, Grima Simon, Jurisevic Milena, Grech Kenneth, Buttigieg Sandra C
Department of Global Health, Economics and Policy, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia.
Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics, Management and Accountancy, University of Malta, Msida, Malta.
Front Public Health. 2018 Aug 6;6:215. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00215. eCollection 2018.
Cold War Era (1946-1991) was marked by the presence of two distinctively different economic systems, namely the free-market (The Western ones) and central-planned (The Eastern ones) economies. The main goal of this study refers to the exploration of development pathways of Public and Private Health Expenditure in all of the countries of the European WHO Region. Based on the availability of fully comparable data from the National Health Accounts system, we adopted the 1995-2014 time horizon. All countries were divided into two groups: those defined in 1989 as free market economies and those defined as centrally-planned economies. We observed six major health expenditures: Total Health Expenditure (% of GDP), Total Health Expenditure (PPP unit), General government expenditure on health (PPP), Private expenditure on health (PPP), Social security funds (PPP) and Out-of-pocket expenditure (PPP). All of the numerical values used refer exclusively to per capita health spending. In a time-window from the middle of the 1990s towards recent years, total health expenditure was rising fast in both groups of countries. Expenditure on health % of GDP in both group of countries increased over time with the increase in the Free-market economies seen to be more rapid. The steeper level of total expenditure on health for the Free-market as of 1989 market economies, is due mainly to a steep increase in both the government and private expenditure on health relative to spending by centrally-planned economies as of the same date, with the out-of-pocket expenditure and the social security funds in the same market economies category following the same steepness. Variety of governments were leading Eastern European countries into their transitional health care reforms. We may confirm clear presence of obvious divergent upward trends in total governmental and private health expenditures between these two groups of countries over the past two decades. The degree of challenge to the fiscal sustainability of these health systems will have to be judged for each single nation, in line with its own local circumstances and perspectives.
冷战时期(1946 - 1991年)的特点是存在两种截然不同的经济体系,即自由市场经济(西方经济体)和中央计划经济(东方经济体)。本研究的主要目标是探索世界卫生组织欧洲区域所有国家公共和私人卫生支出的发展路径。基于国家卫生账户系统中完全可比数据的可得性,我们采用了1995 - 2014年的时间范围。所有国家被分为两组:1989年被定义为自由市场经济的国家和被定义为中央计划经济的国家。我们观察了六项主要卫生支出:卫生总支出(占国内生产总值的百分比)、卫生总支出(购买力平价单位)、政府卫生支出(购买力平价)、私人卫生支出(购买力平价)、社会保障基金(购买力平价)和自付支出(购买力平价)。所有使用的数值均仅指人均卫生支出。在从20世纪90年代中期到近年来的时间窗口内,两组国家的卫生总支出都在快速增长。两组国家的卫生支出占国内生产总值的比例都随时间增加,自由市场经济体的增长更为迅速。截至1989年,自由市场经济体的卫生总支出水平上升幅度更大,主要是因为与同一时期中央计划经济体相比,政府和私人卫生支出都急剧增加,同一市场经济体类别中的自付支出和社会保障基金也呈现相同的急剧增长态势。各国政府纷纷引领东欧国家进行过渡性医疗改革。我们可以确认,在过去二十年中,这两组国家的政府和私人卫生总支出明显呈现出不同的上升趋势。这些卫生系统对财政可持续性的挑战程度必须根据每个国家自身的当地情况和观点来判断。