• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高压氧疗法治疗慢性下肢静脉溃疡的有效性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。

The effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for healing chronic venous leg ulcers: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

作者信息

Thistlethwaite Kenneth R, Finlayson Kathleen J, Cooper P David, Brown Bebe, Bennett Michael H, Kay Graeme, O'Reilly Maria T, Edwards Helen E

机构信息

Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital, Hyperbaric Medicine Service, Herston, Australia.

School of Nursing, Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove, Australia.

出版信息

Wound Repair Regen. 2018 Jul;26(4):324-331. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12657. Epub 2018 Oct 19.

DOI:10.1111/wrr.12657
PMID:30129080
Abstract

Over 30% of venous leg ulcers do not heal despite evidence-based treatment. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) as an adjunct treatment for nonhealing venous leg ulcers. A randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken in three hyperbaric medicine units. Adults with a venous leg ulcer, Transcutaneous Oxygen Measurement indicative of a hypoxic wound responsive to oxygen challenge, and without contraindications for HBOT; were eligible. Of 84 eligible patients, 10 refused and 74 enrolled. 43 participants achieved over 50% ulcer Percent Area Reduction (PAR) after four weeks of evidence-based care and were thus excluded from the intervention phase. Thirty-one participants were randomized to either 30 HBOT treatments (100% oxygen at 2.4 atmospheres absolute (ATA) for 80 minutes), or 30 "placebo" treatments, receiving a validated "sham" air protocol, initially pressurized to 1.2ATA, then cycled between 1.05-1.2ATA for eight minutes before settling at 1.05ATA. The primary outcome was numbers in each group completely healed. Secondary outcomes were ulcer PAR, pain and quality of life, 12 weeks after commencing interventions. The participants' mean age was 70 years (standard deviation (SD) 12.9) and median ulcer duration at enrolment was 62 weeks (range 4-3120). At 12 weeks, there was no significant difference between groups in the numbers completely healed. The HBOT intervention group had a mean of 95 (SD 6.53) ulcer PAR, compared to 54 (SD 67.8) mean PAR for the placebo group (t = -2.24, p = 0.042, mean difference -40.8, SE 18.2) at 12 weeks. HBOT may improve refractory healing in venous leg ulcers, however patient selection is important. In this study, HBOT as an adjunct treatment for nonhealing patients returned indolent ulcers to a healing trajectory.

摘要

尽管采用了循证治疗,但超过30%的下肢静脉溃疡仍无法愈合。本研究旨在确定高压氧疗法(HBOT)作为不愈合下肢静脉溃疡辅助治疗的有效性。在三个高压医学单位进行了一项随机、双盲、平行组、安慰剂对照试验。纳入标准为患有下肢静脉溃疡、经皮氧测量显示伤口缺氧且对氧激发有反应、无HBOT治疗禁忌证的成年人。84名符合条件的患者中,10人拒绝参与,74人登记入组。43名参与者在接受四周循证护理后溃疡面积减少百分比(PAR)超过50%,因此被排除在干预阶段。31名参与者被随机分为两组,一组接受30次HBOT治疗(在2.4绝对大气压(ATA)下吸入100%氧气80分钟),另一组接受30次“安慰剂”治疗,采用经过验证的“假”空气方案,初始加压至1.2ATA,然后在1.05 - 1.2ATA之间循环8分钟,最后稳定在1.05ATA。主要结局是每组完全愈合的人数。次要结局是干预开始12周后的溃疡PAR、疼痛和生活质量。参与者的平均年龄为70岁(标准差(SD)12.9),入组时溃疡持续时间的中位数为62周(范围4 - 3120周)。在12周时,两组之间完全愈合的人数没有显著差异。在12周时,HBOT干预组的溃疡PAR平均为95(SD 6.53),而安慰剂组的平均PAR为54(SD 67.8)(t = -2.24,p = 0.042,平均差异 -40.8,标准误18.2)。HBOT可能会改善下肢静脉溃疡的难治性愈合,然而患者选择很重要。在本研究中,HBOT作为不愈合患者的辅助治疗使难治性溃疡走上了愈合轨道。

相似文献

1
The effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for healing chronic venous leg ulcers: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.高压氧疗法治疗慢性下肢静脉溃疡的有效性:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Wound Repair Regen. 2018 Jul;26(4):324-331. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12657. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
2
Poorly designed research does not help clarify the role of hyperbaric oxygen in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers.设计不佳的研究无助于阐明高压氧在慢性糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的作用。
Diving Hyperb Med. 2016 Sep;46(3):133-134.
3
Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for chronic wounds.慢性伤口的高压氧治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004(2):CD004123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004123.pub2.
4
Randomized trial and local biological effect of autologous platelets used as adjuvant therapy for chronic venous leg ulcers.自体血小板作为慢性下肢静脉溃疡辅助治疗的随机试验及局部生物学效应
J Vasc Surg. 2003 Dec;38(6):1342-8. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(03)00908-x.
5
AVURT: aspirin versus placebo for the treatment of venous leg ulcers - a Phase II pilot randomised controlled trial.AVURT:阿司匹林与安慰剂治疗静脉性腿部溃疡的疗效比较——一项 II 期先导随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 Oct;22(55):1-138. doi: 10.3310/hta22550.
6
Interventions for helping people adhere to compression treatments for venous leg ulceration.帮助人们坚持进行下肢静脉溃疡压迫治疗的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 6(9):CD008378. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008378.pub2.
7
Potential markers of healing from near infrared spectroscopy imaging of venous leg ulcer. A randomized controlled clinical trial comparing conventional with hyperbaric oxygen treatment.近红外光谱成像对静脉性下肢溃疡愈合的潜在标志物。一项比较常规治疗与高压氧治疗的随机对照临床试验。
Wound Repair Regen. 2020 Nov;28(6):856-866. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12853. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
8
Use of weekly, low dose, high frequency ultrasound for hard to heal venous leg ulcers: the VenUS III randomised controlled trial.每周、低剂量、高频超声治疗难以愈合的静脉性腿部溃疡:VenUS III 随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2011 Mar 8;342:d1092. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d1092.
9
A prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing standard wound care with adjunctive hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) to standard wound care only for the treatment of chronic, non-healing ulcers of the lower limb in patients with diabetes mellitus: a study protocol.一项前瞻性、双盲、随机、对照临床试验,旨在比较标准伤口护理联合高压氧治疗(HBOT)与单纯标准伤口护理治疗糖尿病下肢慢性不愈合溃疡的疗效:研究方案。
Trials. 2011 Mar 7;12:69. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-69.
10
Hyperbaric oxygen reduced size of chronic leg ulcers: a randomized double-blind study.高压氧可减小慢性腿部溃疡的面积:一项随机双盲研究。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994 Apr;93(4):829-33; discussion 834.

引用本文的文献

1
A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating a Lyopreserved Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers.一项评估冻干保存羊膜治疗下肢静脉溃疡的多中心、随机、对照临床试验。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 May 4;8(5):e70819. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70819. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Endothelial Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease: Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy as an Emerging Therapeutic Modality?内皮功能障碍与心血管疾病:高压氧治疗会成为一种新兴的治疗方式吗?
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Dec 19;11(12):408. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11120408.
3
Placental-Derived Biomaterials and Their Application to Wound Healing: A Review.
胎盘衍生生物材料及其在伤口愈合中的应用:综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jul 12;10(7):829. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10070829.
4
Adverse effects of hyperbaric oxygen therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.高压氧治疗的不良反应:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 May 18;10:1160774. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1160774. eCollection 2023.
5
Hyperbaric Oxygen as an Adjunct in the Treatment of Venous Ulcers: A Systematic Review.高压氧在静脉溃疡治疗中的辅助作用:系统评价。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2023 Aug;57(6):607-616. doi: 10.1177/15385744231162924. Epub 2023 Mar 8.
6
Topical Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Versus Local Ozone Therapy in Healing of Venous Leg Ulcers.局部高压氧疗法与局部臭氧疗法治疗静脉性腿部溃疡的比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 20;20(3):1967. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20031967.
7
Effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on cognitive dysfunction induced by nitrous oxide abuse: protocol of a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial.高压氧治疗一氧化二氮滥用致认知功能障碍的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 22;12(4):e054876. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054876.
8
Oxygen generating scaffolds regenerate critical size bone defects.产氧支架可修复临界尺寸的骨缺损。
Bioact Mater. 2021 Nov 10;13:64-81. doi: 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.11.002. eCollection 2022 Jul.
9
Venous Leg Ulcers: Advanced Therapies and New Technologies.下肢静脉溃疡:先进疗法与新技术
Biomedicines. 2021 Oct 29;9(11):1569. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines9111569.
10
Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Is an Effective Adjunctive Therapy to Manage Treatment-Resistant Venous Leg Ulcers.高压氧疗法是治疗难愈性下肢静脉溃疡的一种有效辅助疗法。
Ann Vasc Dis. 2021 Sep 25;14(3):273-276. doi: 10.3400/avd.cr.21-00030.